Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
:"Kiwifarms (or someone from Kiwifarms) is here. \n\nBlock, block, block."
":"This was immediately liked by someone whose name here is \"kiwifarms-won\""
":"I've heard of InfoWars but what is Kiwifarms? And how much did the owner get?"
":"I'm all for diverse perspectives, FROM a place of good faith and willingness to hear mine. That DOES NOT include trolls from kiwifarms or people whose entire purpose is to 'own' me for some reason. They aren't entitled to my attention in meatspace, there is no reason to give it to them here."
":"Very telling that they don't have the balls to put up a pfp.\n\nFuck all the way off kiwifarms"

no ones denying the trannies have more balls than any man here.

":"heads up, kiwifarms op"

":"I just reported him and the weird kiwifarms account that faved my reply, I just see null's face and it's reflex"

hahahahaha cant block me if i dont have an account motherfucker! you already banned me. fuck you vitalia. SNEED YWNBAW.

kek:


":"I mean, there's even offshoots of kiwifarms, of all things"
 
Last edited:
Here's two scary things I saw:
no.jpg
God No!.jpg
 
I never really understood the concept of going on a social media website, and proceeding to use blocklists to block people you've never even interacted with. That holds a dangerous precedent. Who makes these blocklists, and by what metric? Who gets preemptively put on these? Are they serial harassers, or did they have the wrong opinion at some point. Hell, maybe they have the wrong PFP. Or the wrong bio.

It's very weird and doesn't reflect how reality works. You're creating a very limited virtual world for yourself while interacting with the real world less and less. Then when you go out in the real world and see people not holding the same warped expectation for reality, you're gonna be left feeling pretty alienated.
 
>Hell, maybe they have the wrong PFP. Or the wrong bio.

"no bio" and "no posts" are commonly cited infractions as well.

ding, got another one in

":"kiwifarms-won.bsky.social"

IMG_0777.jpg

im in. i want to demolish and subvert a troon safe space in the exact same way they ran all the women out of lesbian bars and the way they banned me from queer spaces. i have nowhere to go because of troons and i hope they turn your degenerate hugbox into E-Maralago.com
 
Last edited:
I would LOVE to see them implementing things like the pink triangles we use here. Something that symbolizes that they are disruptive or "toxic" because I legitimately think they would not be able to handle it.
They kinda-sorta have this already, although they aren't given out by Bluesky admins. It's another user-curated thing, similar to blocklists.

They're called Labelers, and they can be used to apply both "good" and "bad" labels to other users. You have to subscribe to the Labeler to actually see the labels, though.
https://bsky.app/search?q=labeler
1.png 2.png 3.png 4.png 5.png 6.png 7.png

I wonder if this is causing technical problems for Bluesky... 🤔
I vaguely remember Elon Musk complaining once that excessively large blocklists were causing technical problems for Twitter (especially when nutjobs like Alejandra Caraballo subscribe to multiple huge blocklists to block literally hundreds of thousands of accounts). And as we've seen, people on Bluesky absolutely love using & abusing blocklists, labelers, and curated feeds via Bluesky's "Lists" feature.


Btw, here's possibly my favorite label on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/search?q=bluesky+elder
It's a label for people who signed up to Bluesky before August 2023. A lot of the posts about "Bluesky Elders" are jokes, but there are indeed some users who take great pride in being Bluesky Elders and acting like they're wiser/better than newcomers. :story:
a.png b.png c.png d.png e.png f.png g.png h.png i.png j.png k.png l.png m.png n.png o.png p.png q.png r.png
 
> I wonder if this is causing technical problems for Bluesky...

it is and theyve mitigated it by restricting you to signing up for 20 shitlists. so now you have to prioritize the labels you want to slap on people. are they against trans? are they maga? are they anti otherkin? anti furry? antitherian? whatever the fuck that is because thats a real one too. are they homophobes? are they twitter grifters? are they kiwifarmers theyre running out of nazi triangles to sew on our prison uniforms FAST. and all the lists start choking after they have about 2000 people on them. sad.

thats the thing i alluded to last night. pfrazee slapped that restriction in.
if he didnt actually fix it ill be back to make fun of the whole thing when it explodes.

their github "issues" tab is a good place to look for mischief ideas when a bug is reported. one that is open right now , involves an "abend" in the moderation server. it stops processing the moderation queue. the only workaround is to restart it. and all the moderation reports are lost. LOL





":"Do I have Kiwifarms clout or something? Wow that's crazy. I had no idea I was culturally relevant."
View attachment 6655648
":"Am seeing the obvious signifiers in PFPs \u0026 handles. I want to be crystal clear I will block and report any kiwiscrotes I see active on this website. Josh Moon is a cockroach, and his supporters are parasites. If you from there you can go back with all the other TERFs, Nazi's \u0026 pedos where u belong!"
IMG_0779.jpeg

again, you cant block me because i dont have an account.
you cant put me on a list because i dont have an account.
you cant report me to the commissar because i dont have an account.

IMG_0778.jpeg

IMG_0780.jpeg

go dilate your stinkditch.

so whats the plan?
":"At some point soon we will reach a terminal velocity where anyone still on twitter will be viewed as a poster on 4Chan. When that happens, it will no longer be considered a rational investment of advertising money altogether."
:"I've seen a few bigger left leaning accounts being like \"We need to stay and fight or they'll win!\" On the nazi pedophiles site.\n\nLike, ya'll aren't posting on 4chan either are you?"
":"You shouldn't be worried too much, our objective rn is not only to bring reasonable people but the brands, the news, the content creators. Make X synonymous with 4chan. Like we don't worry too much about not pushing back in 4chan, because it is their territory and normies don't wanna be with them"


thats correct but you stupid fucks are haranguing the "normies" who try to join and putting them on "lists" and banning them over stupid shit and running them off. already. a million accounts lost in the first stalinist purge.

"you must leave twitter and come over here, nazi!"
"ICK ITS A NAZI FROM TWITTER BAN IT."

stupid stupid stupid horrible fucking people.

and so its tortuous interference with twitter/x's business operation with what appears (?) to be an inorganic botnet and the media hyping this shit site

if they didnt pre emptively block you,
youd block them anyway . because this is all youre "missing".
a full 1.65% of the conversation is shit like this.
theyre manufacturing their "victimhood"
and attacking people who just signed up and opened their accounts.
the block lists and removing yourself from quote dunks keeps people from looking at their post history and asking "this you?" when they talk about "baiting maga chuds" because they do the exact same shit.
you victimize them merely by joining
they accuse you before you even made your first post.
you cant respond to them
no one can ask if they have any proofs for their lists.
you cant read them bragging about baiting and raiding people on twitter.
the firehose sees all.

Screenshot from 2024-11-17 13-10-23.png
 
Last edited:
Trannies suck cock at properly grooming themselves from grifters and power-hungry faggots that strive for power if the retarded faggots fly the "white, blue, and pink"
 
That just about says it all. He wants to block people who say interesting/provocative things. These people will be on closed networks they’ve populated with AIs of varying personalities who all agree with them in a few years.
My theory is he is a furfag who dishes it out but can't take it. He wants to prove to the world how woke he is and not a Kiwifarm chud while baiting people, but spergs out when people "harass" him back or start "discourse" about paedo/zoo furries he's pals with. A tonne of furfags have tried this to not end up blocked by their favourite porn artists who are mostly woke leftists. Furaffinity is Turbonium2K (archive) and has a lot of different handles. His Carrd too. Blubfeesh, Turbonium2K, Heavyshell, and Brio Blubfeesh are usernames he uses.

1731869266277.png

Old cars (specifically Volkswagen), old computers, and retro technology in general seem to be what he spergs over besides fat furry paedophilia art, so those are potential identifiers for his Kiwi account. Retro tech seems to be common sperg interests, but the VW fixation is unique enough.
 
"Bluesky has not yet found its distinctive identity or purpose"
:story:
Well yeah, I mean, so far its entire identity is based on it being better than Elon's fascist Twitter. It feels like Bluesky has to always compare itself to Twitter rather than be its own thing. Perhaps that's why it hasn't found its identity.
it will find its identity as a non-binary trans lesbian multiple system of color at age 30 like 99% of its userbase
 
Let's see what a quick Google search says about the reaction of Bluesky's most vulnerable users to the potential of block lists being weaponized or doing collateral damage. From the first google result we have this:
1731866712709.png
Even just a little oopsie woopsie from a wholesome Trans coomer fellow lewd content creator was enough to send xim to the phantom zone. A little spaghetti falls out of your pocket while stalking an e-thot and your "aspirations of possible monetization" of your deranged amateur porn career are over. Most people on that thread share similar feelings about Blusky's over-zealous moderations tools; that alone speaks volumes about it.
The whole story for those with popcorn:

That particular morning on my feed I'd seen many posts from one account in particular belonging to a totally SFW cosplayer with just a handful of public photos and no content of any sort being offered otherwise aggressively demanding funds and preemptively berating both no one in particular and anyone who stumbled across them for not sending money. They were all variations of "I'M NOT FUCKING ASKING, SEND ME $$ RIGHT FUCKING NOW", "FUCK EVERYONE HERE WHERE THE FUCK IS MY MONEY?", or something similar.

The sex worker I had attempted to deliver a compliment, who I will not name, immediately started cussing me out for a) not having tipped her myself and b) putting down sex workers on their feed. I explained the unhinged and extremely entitled account (although I chose my words more carefully than that at this point) was not from a sex worker at all - they weren't offering anything of any sort and were making demands without even specifying what the money was for. I noted that I followed her (the SW I had replied to) more or less exclusively to pass along her mutual aid requests, and that I am not a consumer of lewd content but a creator of it myself.

They demanded I provide the name of the account posting the aggressive demands, which I did not feel comfortable doing since it was not my goal to have them burned at the stake. They posted on her feed asking if anyone had seen the person I was describing. Then they said something really, really mean to me - I don't even remember what, just that I was furious - and I responded telling her they was being really rude in response to what was intended as a compliment, expressed that I felt like I was being tormented by a highschool bully, and finished with something like. "I'm sorry, but I've been pushed around this way too much IRL to have it happen online without at least calling out the behavior."

The next thing I knew I was blocked, and then suddenly -lots- of other accounts had me blocked. I knew it was something they'd done, but wasn't sure if they'd just asked her followers to block me or what. They're a pretty popular SW from what I had seen, so that seemed possible. It turns out they actually submitted me to a Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist and Sex Worker Exclusionary Radical Feminist block list, despite me being a lewd content creator who is hoping to eventually monetize after building some kind of following (which is of course now very difficult to do) and a trans woman myself.

It really shouldn't need saying, but simply disagreeing with the principle of aggressive, derogatory DEMANDS for money (in this case not coming from a SWer at all, though I don't really think it should matter who they are coming from if they're totally unreasonable) is not the same thing as being a SWERF. Neither is defending yourself from from a SWer who is attacking you in their comments. Frankly, although I believe it is important to be supportive of sex workers, not being very supportive is still not the same thing as being a SWERF. The only thing that should label someone as a SWERF is being fundamentally against sex work.
(Keep in mind this Reddit post [A] is from a couple months before the big 𝕏odus, expect stories like this to repeat as things progress)
I don't know if what he is saying is 100% true since he's only blocked by 30 or so users and doesn't seem to belong to any SWERF blocklist anymore according to Clearsky. Maybe Clearsky isn't working properly or maybe people just don't want to see his abhorrent nudes and transparent autism on display. Who knows.
In case you are wondering, yes, he looks and acts exactly like you'd expect, he's a walking bingo card.
1731868611878.png
Another complain I've seen brought up frequently is the fact that a lot of the block lists also include people whose only sin is following or interacting with other users accused of wrong-think, regardless on the time or circumstances of said interactions. People randomly find themselves in block lists because they follow some literally who account that said something uncomfortable long after they followed them, or because things move so fast in slacktivist circles that certain postures age extremely quickly. All of this without any form of information or warning, and with the only real transparency being brought by a third-party app. One day you follow a webcomic artist because you find something funny, months later they unknowingly post a stonetoss edit without malice and your account is suddenly branded with a scarlet letter (probably a capital N). Fitting the platform's logo, a butterfly effect of sorts.
Once people realize how easily weaponized this guilt-by-association bullshit truly is, we are going to see a lot of salt flowing.
 
Once people realize how easily weaponized this guilt-by-association bullshit truly is, we are going to see a lot of salt flowing.

bingo . you didnt think the wrong thoughts or vote the wrong votes or skeet the wrong skeets but you accidentally followed someone who did. now grovel for forgiveness from your troon overlords , or be shunned even faster than a mormon family disowning their "trans" son.

just in:

,\n\nPlease forgive me if I've mistakenly followed any assholes or fuckheads, there were just too many new followers too quickly for me to do my usual due diligence.\n\nI'm sure our Mute \u0026 Block \u0026 Lists will sort that all out eventually."

way too many examples of

":"I was busy blocking all of his followers first. 😁"
 
Blocklists were on Xitter except the data wasn't public like Bluesky and the unofficial apps on Twitter to see if someone was on a blocklist weren't reliable. People could share blocklist with others manually. Clearsky service has gone down frequently lately but Bluesky is very transparent about what is public and unencrypted. When Elon acquired Xitter a lot of those buggy and unreliable apps were probably killed.

Same shite but it's easier than ever on Bluesky.
 
Then when you go out in the real world and see people not holding the same warped expectation for reality, you're gonna be left feeling pretty alienated.
thats why they stay online and need more and more insular hugboxes when their old ones fall through instead of just moving on.
Who makes these blocklists, and by what metric? Who gets preemptively put on these? Are they serial harassers, or did they have the wrong opinion at some point. Hell, maybe they have the wrong PFP. Or the wrong bio.
all of these, when you meet someone on the internet saying "fuck you retard" you think "k" to them that is an unacceptable affront to their image in what is one of the few spaces where they find some acceptance. the end goal is to force the internet to go back to how it was in the 00s when most people only had easy access to left wing sources and the general trend was you can be a shitty person and a complete troll even bringing people to suicide but just not with the racism or bigotry except now you wont be able to be ironically racist like people were then because of a new trump induced paranoia.

back then alot of people wouldnt mock them for being fags or creeps because accusations of bigotry held weight even in more free for all corners so they had free reign to act big bad and tough and pro total free speech unlike the christian right and the "man" and be praised as rebels for flaunting their gross pedophilic vices. they cant ever accept the genie is out of the bottle and that time period was always doomed to being an ephemeral transitional period.
Let's see what a quick Google search says about the reaction of Bluesky's most vulnerable users to the potential of block list being weaponized. From the first google result we have this:
its amazing that they dont know the politicking to get randoms labeled as political dissident for clout and petty revenge is a feature and not a bug.
 
The fact that so many people are both blocking en masse and getting blocked kinda makes this site the realization of what Hideki Kamiya used to do, but taken to the absolute extreme. It kinda makes you wonder about how the youth who want to escape to this site and use it as an echo chamber for their own beliefs and cancel out anyone who disagrees. Ergo, it's the prime example of the terminally online leftists' fear of "diversity of thought."

1731872329846.png
 
Back