Snowflake Flamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2025
Yes, when his occasionally correct his reasoning is post hoc, but someone without grievances, like most of the posters in this thread or with different grievances, like basil (didn't get invited to the suck n fuck) can come to essentially the same conclusion about the baptards. So on a surface level Fuentes looks coherent to an uninformed observer. This is also why he has a certain following in spite of everything IMO and why the baptards hate him so much.I think he has coherent points if only by accident because his point happens to overlap with a personal grievance. His Thiel and Vance criticisms are most certainly driven in part (or perhaps mostly) by the fact that he failed to secure the Thielbux himself/he’s radioactive in electoral politics, but that doesn’t make them incorrect.
It’s always helpful to remember what the motivation behind a particular e-celeb’s takes are, but I think it does people a disservice to throw the baby out with the bathwater just because you dislike the messenger. I say this as someone who joined the farms for the sole purpose of a-logging Fuentes btw. He has a point about BAP as well, regardless of how much of it is driven by pettiness.