- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
End of her storyline I think. She's dead as of today.So I heard marvel is killing off Jane Foster and giving the hammer back to Odinson?
Crap sales on Thor or just the end of her storyline?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
End of her storyline I think. She's dead as of today.So I heard marvel is killing off Jane Foster and giving the hammer back to Odinson?
Crap sales on Thor or just the end of her storyline?
For an article about attacking #Comicsgate this is incredibly lazy. I did read some articles trying to attack #Comicsgate as well but the thing is, they at least make an attempt to explain #ComicsGate 's main points such as "diversity hurts sales" and "political issues in comics shouldn't be allowed", as well as making the usual points of why #ComicsGate 's opinions are wrong.Buzzfeed made a Comicsgate hit piece. Removed all context and is incredibly one sided, y'know like always. Skims through some Comicsgate "harassment" stuff and talks a about EVS a lot, calling him the usual buzzwords.
Whenever I think about the anti-CG movement, what really strikes me is their huge incompetence, in the same amount of time, their gaming counterpart managed to firmly plant a hard-to-disprove smear on their opposing autists, but here, it's just unfocused screeching against an industry great (which is what EVS is by this point). You also got people planning ops against D&C on their public Facebook pages for god's sake, even the most autistic op we've seen had the sense to at least start off in private.For an article about attacking #Comicsgate this is incredibly lazy. I did read some articles trying to attack #Comicsgate as well but the thing is, they at least make an attempt to explain #ComicsGate 's main points such as "diversity hurts sales" and "political issues in comics shouldn't be allowed", as well as making the usual points of why #ComicsGate 's opinions are wrong.
This one is just mostly screeching about a comic book veteran artist, and very hard for me to take this seriously.
I assume they just heard "harassing women, LGBTQ+, and PoCs!" from some idiot and jumped in without context as a chance to look "woke".LMAO, Leave it to BuzzFeed to have their Correction section be wrong as well. Aubrey Sitterson wrote both those disasters (Re-Archived for the Correction bit):
![]()
Is anyone honestly, legitimately surprised by this? This has been so heavily foreshadowed ever since they revealed it was Jane that you'd have to be either blind or not paying attention/not buying the comic... which probably means we showed be seeing some SJW reeeeeing in the near future.End of her storyline I think. She's dead as of today.
![]()
Is anyone honestly, legitimately surprised by this? This has been so heavily foreshadowed ever since they revealed it was Jane that you'd have to be either blind or not paying attention/not buying the comic... which probably means we showed be seeing some SJW reeeeeing in the near future.
Though when you think about it, this story as a marketing ploy was kinda brilliant in a scummy Marvel publicity stunt sort of way: Get an influx of orders for the first issue because everyone wants to see this "Woman Thor" plot everyone's talking about, drag the identity reveal out for about 6-8 issues so that same influx sticks around for the reveal and justify the continuation of the change, give her a built-in expiration date in the form of cancer so you can switch her out whenever, and then ride out the inevitable sales decline for as long as possible until you reach a convenient advertising point to kill her off in a heroic fashion and bring back the regular Thor for one last publicity stunt to draw in sales with.
And wouldn't you know it, March is the same month that the official DVD release came out for Thor: Ragnarok. Imagine that.
Ironically, Jane was easily the best selling of the diversity replacement characters as far as I know. Outside of some weird issue to issue fluctuations I've heard about. Had they never associated it with feminism and it ended in 2015/2016 then I believe you'd have something that'd be better received as a tragic story about the mostly ignored original love interest for Thor.Is anyone honestly, legitimately surprised by this? This has been so heavily foreshadowed ever since they revealed it was Jane that you'd have to be either blind or not paying attention/not buying the comic... which probably means we showed be seeing some SJW reeeeeing in the near future.
Though when you think about it, this story as a marketing ploy was kinda brilliant in a scummy Marvel publicity stunt sort of way: Get an influx of orders for the first issue because everyone wants to see this "Woman Thor" plot everyone's talking about, drag the identity reveal out for about 6-8 issues so that same influx sticks around for the reveal and justify the continuation of the change, give her a built-in expiration date in the form of cancer so you can switch her out whenever, and then ride out the inevitable sales decline for as long as possible until you reach a convenient advertising point to kill her off in a heroic fashion and bring back the regular Thor for one last publicity stunt to draw in sales with.
And wouldn't you know it, March is the same month that the official DVD release came out for Thor: Ragnarok. Imagine that.
Apparently Logan is coming back too. X-23 is back to her old self. Maybe Marvel is waking up?"Do a shocking plot point so people buy a bunch of the initial issues and just go back to normal when it stops selling"?
You've just described 50 years of the comic industry, nignog.
Logan has already been back....just not as Wolverine. He's fumbling around with the space gem in the build up to some dumb cash-in event for the Infinity War movie.Apparently Logan is coming back too. X-23 is back to her old self. Maybe Marvel is waking up?
I also hate the SJW shit in comics but the bigger problem, for me, is that it costs like $4.00 - $5.00 for something I finish reading in five minutes, and I know that if I wait a few months I can get a TPB at like a third of the cost and will be able to spend a good chunk of time enjoying it. And I'll be able to put it on my bookshelf to boot instead of having longboxes everywhere. It's not a major hobby for me so there isn't much incentive to buy the singles on their release dates.And so it goes, with the Skeptics saying that the industry is dying because of the creators and the creators blaming the fans for not wanting what they create.
From the linked article, this right here, is the problem. Creators aren't making what fans want, and when informed they aren't, can only respond with Hillary-esque SJW-fueled "Well, they aren't the fans we WANT anyway! The deplorables!" personal moral outrage.
For $5 there's always a bunch of silly little pixel art games on steam you can buy, and instead of 5 minutes you can get 5 hours of entertainment out of them. Or 10, or 20, or more.I also hate the SJW shit in comics but the bigger problem, for me, is that it costs like $4.00 - $5.00 for something I finish reading in five minutes, and I know that if I wait a few months I can get a TPB at like a third of the cost and will be able to spend a good chunk of time enjoying it. And I'll be able to put it on my bookshelf to boot instead of having longboxes everywhere. It's not a major hobby for me so there isn't much incentive to buy the singles on their release dates.
I might have missed some things but with Waid's twitter gone, we can only wait until he comes back.
![]()
If this is true, it seems Hasbro has had enough of IDW fucking with their brands in the name of Social Justice.
Apparently Logan is coming back too. X-23 is back to her old self. Maybe Marvel is waking up?