I am beginning to see a consistant narrative from all christians on the far right whether they are Traditionalist catholics, Common Filth, or CI - which is all a variant on the whole "don't put your faith in man, put your faith in god" argument (when arguing against christianity you can't refer to christianity in practice). They have this weird pretendtion of being part of this wider christian culture when practically no christians actually agree with them on the things that 'matter' to them, they reject every church and religious instituion because even they cannot defend them - but their whole rationalisation is that though they are all corrupt sinners, they have the 'means' of truly living by god (ie if they saw christianity the way they saw it). Is this not literally rhetorical LARPing? Like National Anarchists banging on about how they are the 'true' anarchists - you can rationalise anything with a tiny amount of intellect.
They have the fucking nerve to say that Christianity is the only thing that can save the West, when it can't even save itself - and it isn't just one church, it is every church.
In regards to CI, can you really even call these people christians? I don't think they are, they are subversives who have fetishised an identity in this religion, at least that is how most born cultural christians see it. I don't see the difference between this and satanism/mansonism which has exactly the same pretendtion of being consistant with the bible myth.
