💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Votes: 128 39.5%

  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Votes: 196 60.5%
  • Total voters
    324
AirMail said:
And you don't believe that should be ok. They are your sacred cow. No confrontation allowed. Bow your head when you walk by.
Click to expand...
"Imagine... walking by a bunch of blacks....and NOT screaming nigger!? The humiliation! The sense of castration I feel every time I see a black face nonchalantly whizz by, shielded by the censorious hand of Uncle Sam from my glorious cry: NIGGER! NIGGER! FUCKING NIGGER!"

The same courtesy you would pay to anyone else? Yeah when you try to piss people off by insulting them and using inflammatory language, this will be considered "provocation" by the courts after it inevitably results in a self-defense situation. Doesn't have to be "nigger", either, by the way, as the threshold for fighting words is well below that mark.
 
Sirfaggot said:
"Imagine... walking by a bunch of blacks....and NOT screaming nigger!? The humiliation! The sense of castration I feel every time I see a black face nonchalantly whizz by, shielded by the censorious hand of Uncle Sam from my glorious cry: NIGGER! NIGGER! FUCKING NIGGER!"

The same courtesy you would pay to anyone else? Yeah when you try to piss people off by insulting them and using inflammatory language, this will be considered "provocation" by the courts after it inevitably results in a self-defense situation. Doesn't have to be "nigger", either, by the way, as the threshold for fighting words is well below that mark.
Click to expand...
So you admit that you want there to be no right for a white man to confront a black man, even only with words, and that a white man who confronts a black man should lose the right to live.
Hitagle said:
It's like saying someone someone didn't want to grab something out the oven and possibly get burnt. Then why are you wearing oven mits?
Click to expand...
Because sometimes you have to do things you don't want to do. Sometimes the cost of not doing them is worse than the cost of doing them.
 
Homeboy Bob Proctor said:
Jewish pedophile Jake lang got the max 10 days for contempt lmao I love this judge


View attachment 9046701

View attachment 9046700
Click to expand...
"I supporrt chudthebuilder, that's why i'm going to go to his trial and make him look bad"

retarded
Citus Atro said:
flight ticket to Istanbul
Click to expand...
Is he balding? when was it purchased

I'm guessing it's going to be a while before we see the kick video? Do we know for certain it exists?
 
Shartyxisters....what do you mean the case isn't looking good from the prosecution's side? How am I going to explain this to my fellow chudx (all browns)?
 
AirMail said:
So you admit that you want there to be no right for a white man to confront a black man, even only with words, and that a white man who confronts a black man should lose the right to live.
Click to expand...

You can confront people aggressively and call them a nigger or a "pussy ass bitch" or whatever but you may expect that they might try to fight you. At that point you can either fight back or run or call the police for help but it's not your green light to murder them.

You're so cooked mentally that you're inverting the situation in your mind and claiming people think that a white person who confronts a black man should lose his right to live.

You stupid shit, it's the black man that nearly died here and it's Chud that tried to kill him.
 


The real headline was chud the builder shot an unarmed man and himself and made the district attorneys job super easy and cant get bail funds from a legitimate source and rots away.



Screenshot_20260523_135715_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
AirMail said:
So you admit that you want there to be no right for a white man to confront a black man, even only with words, and that a white man who confronts a black man should lose the right to live.
Click to expand...
Maybe you need a sub-40 IQ to see and understand the perspective of @AirMail here, and @DominoPetachi @White Pride Worldwide @Twix Eatr and friends?

I assumed it was just horseshoe theory with how they constantly lie like the left does, ignoring what is infront of them and just spamming their alternative reality, but it's been like 150 pages now. 150 pages of repeating the same wrong thing while people are showing them, with quotes and shit, how it is wrong.

It has to be genuine retardation, they are legitimately just incapable of understanding what it is they are reading. Nothing else makes sense at this point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom