💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

[Sirfaggot]

Bro, how are you so liberal with definitions when equating prison time with death, yet so autistic in drawing the line between lolicon and CP?

View attachment 9051229

"I don't think we should execute pedophiles because you'd already be taking my- I mean their life away by imprisoning them."

 

[jimbraps]

niggers

emergency reported for racism

 

[Carmen The Aids Rabbit]

And so it turns out @AirMail is a lolicon enjoyer. For fuck sake

You cannot make this stuff up.

If only Cuck the BLACKED went around shooting nonces instead of being a nigger...

 

[AirMail]

This isn't how the law works.

The clue was in this question I asked you earlier. If you answer the question properly we might get somewhere, if you continue to spam negrates and avoid what people are actually saying I will assume you are intact retarded.

L

💪 Tough Guys Post in thread 'Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder'

Friday at 3:15 PM

View attachment 9042631View attachment 9042638View attachment 9042639
"your honor this tweet doesn't imply anything as to why he called them chimps and rioting monkeys is just a figure of speech and why he kept streaming when he seriously thought he would have to kill someone is uhrmmm"

Listen, @Twix Eatr & @DominoPetachi you pair of retards, I'll give you an out here. Do you believe that the judge will not allow these tweets to be used by the prosecution as evidence? Or do you genuinely believe a jury will not find these tweets incriminating when deciding whether Chud needed to mag dump...

• lamppost

Reactions: x 6 x 3

And so it turns out @AirMail is a lolicon enjoyer. For fuck sake

You cannot make this stuff up.

I think you're a lolicon enjoyer.

 

[lamppost]

I think you're a lolicon enjoyer.

My stance on lolicon is that anyone who watches or defends it gets the chair, pedo.

 

[AirMail]

My stance on lolicon is that anyone who watches or defends it gets the chair, pedo.

You're totally a lolicon enjoyer. You think that cartoon pornography doesn't involve any real children. That makes you a lolicon enjoyer.

 

[lamppost]

You're totally a lolicon enjoyer. You think that cartoon pornography doesn't involve any real children. That makes you a lolicon enjoyer.

I genuinely think you are a paedophile. Whatever gay shit your retarded, gooner mushed brain is telling you to post here is irrelevant to me now.

Your honour, my name is Chud the Builder, and I am here today to tell you that Mr Fox is in fact NOT a Nigger, but is in actuality a 3000 year old Eldrich Dragonkin Vampire, and I was sent here by the gods themselves to vanquish him from this mortal realm.

 

[Twix Eatr]

This isn't how the law works.

It's exactly how the law works. You aren't even an American. Probably some British faggot behind a VPN so he doesn't get 6 months in jail for these posts.

 

[AirMail]

I genuinely think you are a paedophile. Whatever gay shit your retarded, gooner mushed brain is telling you to post here is irrelevant to me now.

Your honour, my name is Chud the Builder, and I am here today to tell you that Mr Fox is in fact NOT a Nigger, but is in actuality a 3000 year old Eldrich Dragonkin Vampire, and I was sent here by the gods themselves to vanquish him from this mortal realm.

Face it. You don't think cartoon pornography involves real children. That makes you a lolicon enjoyer. You sicko.

 

[lamppost]

It's exactly how the law works. You aren't even an American. Probably some British faggot behind a VPN so he doesn't get 6 months in jail for these posts.

Answer the question.

Do you believe that the judge will not allow these tweets to be used by the prosecution as evidence? Or do you genuinely believe a jury will not find these tweets incriminating when deciding whether Chud needed to mag dump into a public area?

If it's the former then please explain why you believe the judge will not allow them as evidence?

If it's the latter, then please explain why you think a jury will not be persuaded by the prosecution's argument?

 

[Twix Eatr]

If you want to continue obsessing over irrelevant shit, go for it. Your additionally retarded statements are immaterial. We were talking about how you don't know how to read. You kept referring to when Chud said he'd lawfully defend himself if assaulted as:

he publicly stated before the fact that he was going to murder someone 'in self defense'

Chud has been trying to provoke an attack on him so he can legally murder someone for months, he has publicly stated multiple times what his plan is

And now you're asking me whether I think a judge will show them? "No, answer this irrelevant question, saar!"

 

[Greedy Fly]

What the fuck did you guys do? Now instead of sperging about niggers for 150 pages, he's going to subject us to 150 pages of sperging about little girls.

 

[AirMail]

What the fuck did you guys do? Now instead of sperging about niggers for 150 pages, he's going to subject us to 150 pages of sperging about little girls.

Don't bring up dumb irrelevant shit if you don't want to talk about dumb irrelevant shit.

If anyone wants to throw unfounded allegations at me, that's fine, I'll just throw them right back. It doesn't bother me.

 

[lamppost]

If you want to continue obsessing over irrelevant shit, go for it. Your additionally retarded statements are immaterial. We were talking about how you don't know how to read. You kept referring to when Chud said he'd lawfully defend himself if assaulted as:


And now you're asking me whether I think a judge will show them? "No, answer this irrelevant question, saar!"

"Chud said he'd lawfully defend himself if assaulted" if you believe this then that is fine, but the reality is the prosecution will use what Chud has said and done to present a case to the jury that will argue he did not act in self defence - this may not even be necessary as the court CCTV footage may be enough alone.

Hopefully you get a spot on the jury as most people are not going to view the following as favourably as you do.

"Series finale is dead chimp on the
pavement and you monkeys rioting when I
walk free. Stay tuned"

 

[AirMail]

but the reality is the prosecution will use what Chud has said and done to present a case to the jury that will argue he did not act in self defence - this may not even be necessary as the court CCTV footage may be enough alone.

Hopefully you get a spot on the jury as most people are not going to view the following as favourably as you do

No one cares retard. No one ever said the prosecution won't do that, or that it definitely won't work. Your argument is that many people are as retarded as you are, and we completely agree with that.

 

[Twix Eatr]

Guy, we already see that you can't read or process words into complete constructions of what's being described. Why are you hellbent on proving it again and again after it's been established? We get it. You don't know the difference between a conditional threat rooted in self-defense, something totally legal, and, "I'm going to go out there and murder someone!"

You're now devolving your already braindead take into, "Well, I mean, you could see how it might look to the jury then, right?" Of course I can, you annoying faggot, because the jury is filled with retards like you. That's the whole problem here. There are too many losers like you who think it's suddenly not self-defense if you acknowledged someone might try and kill you, but were prepared to kill them.

Pathetic.

 

[Sirfaggot]

At this point the thread's focus should be expanded to include his supporters.

Face it. You don't think cartoon pornography involves real children. That makes you a lolicon enjoyer. You sicko.

We don't use this ridiculous standard for any other category of adult media. Does stepmom hentai not qualify as MILF porn because it's animated?

 

[-VorpalAnvil-]

This thread is nothing but a spamfest of self hating goys, shitposters and JIDF wagies.

 

[AirMail]

We don't use this ridiculous standard for any other category of adult media. Does stepmom hentai not qualify as MILF porn because it's animated?

That's a good point.

Some people would probably say that it's MILF poor, others would say it's cartoon porn, others would say that it's cartoon MILF porn.

But child porn is categorically different than MILF porn, right? It's a much more serious and consequential subject, so it's normal to speak more accurately when referring to it.

 

[lamppost]

*snip*

Except you said this you sperg...

It's exactly how the law works

After my reply to this, saying "this is not how the law works"...

Where in the law does it say that you lose the right to self defense with a gun if you provoke an attack, but retain the right to self defense with fists?

If all you're intending to do is run your gay little wignat LARP then carry on, but you 2 faggots are literally quoting and talking about the actual law, which you're now agreeing will probably find Chud guilty.

I don't care about Chud screaming nigger at people, I never want anyone to be charged for screaming nigger at people, I never want niggers to get off with assault after punching people for screaming nigger, I also don't want retards intentionally engineering a situation where they're firing 7 shots off into a public area.