Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%

  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%

  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%

  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%

  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%

  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%

  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%
  • Total voters
    2,240
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Broken Cuddles, SpiceyHuman and 9 others
S.C.U.D. said:
Oh my god. This is like Christmas. I can't wait to read the insane ramblings.
Click to expand...
I do also wonder how he will try to claim posting s DCMA notice, one that was honored btw, is somehow a copyright violation.

Personally I hope he goes the old Capone route and openly states that he's just using Copyright law to stop harassment of his eminent self.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, SpiceyHuman, Marvin and 4 others
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: suspended animation, SpiceyHuman, Neetorino and 10 others
Sprate Header said:
But I thought the takedown was carried out? Isn't that what the "Approved" means in the title? How can he make the contributory copyright infringement argument when the alleged copyright infringement was already taken down???
Click to expand...
My assumption is the lawsuit is over Null publishing the takedown request, which Acerthorn spent most of the actual email demanding he not do, smugly gobbling about that retarded appeals court ruling in Greer v. Moon which he felt gave him the power to make such a demand.

I haven't actually read the filings yet though so it's just the most logical guess, however we all know Acerthorn and logic are not on speaking terms. Hopefully someone with PACER access can shed more light on the filing.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spider_expert, Mango Cobra, Broken Cuddles and 9 others
Sprate Header said:
But I thought the takedown was carried out? Isn't that what the "Approved" means in the title? How can he make the contributory copyright infringement argument when the alleged copyright infringement was already taken down???
Click to expand...
Because Null posted the DMCA notice. How *dare* he disobey the great and mighty wereturkey. Hopefully it's simple enough that it will get slapped down and get him another vexatious litigant status. I wonder if he'll be one in every court in the country before he dies of a hotdog overdose.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Broken Cuddles, SpiceyHuman and 7 others
S.C.U.D. said:
My assumption is the lawsuit is over Null publishing the takedown request, which Acerthorn spent most of the actual email demanding he not do, smugly gobbling about that retarded appeals court ruling in Greer v. Moon which he felt gave him the power to make such a demand.

I haven't actually read the filings yet though so it's just the most logical guess, however we all know Acerthorn and logic are not on speaking terms. Hopefully someone with PACER access can shed more light on the filing.
Click to expand...
Yeah but the only reason publishing a takedown request could be considered grounds to sue is if he's using the 10th Circuit's theory that the publishing of a takedown request is a component of contributory copyright infringement, but how could the publishing of the takedown request contribute to copyright infringement if it coincided with the alleged infringement being removed by the publisher? This nigger is retarded lmfao
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: CEO of Gay, Broken Cuddles, SpiceyHuman and 11 others
Sprate Header said:
How can he make the contributory copyright infringement argument when the alleged copyright infringement was already taken down???
Click to expand...
Simple, he types out crackpot gibberish with his fat sausage fingers and then files it.
Useful_Mistake said:
WV is in the 4th
Click to expand...
I think venue is improper but at the same time it has a reputation as a rocket docket. I'm not sure if that's still the case.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, SpiceyHuman, Marvin and 11 others
  • Like
Reactions: SpiceyHuman, Marvin, Gorton Colu and 4 others
Lawfriends, please help me understand.
4chan has people upload content all the time, and 4chan itself isn't getting lawsuit after lawsuit for DMCA bullshit.
Kiwifarms, in my general retardation understanding, has similar rules where the users don't claim copyright and upload whatever, so why is KF getting lawsuits but not 4chinz?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SpiceyHuman
Not a bee said:
Lawfriends, please help me understand.
4chan has people upload content all the time, and 4chan itself isn't getting lawsuit after lawsuit for DMCA bullshit.
Kiwifarms, in my general retardation understanding, has similar rules where the users don't claim copyright and upload whatever, so why is KF getting lawsuits but not 4chinz?
Click to expand...
4chan being a total fed op might have something to do with it, also the perceived lack of permanence of 4chan posts.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: TooManyKittens, Broken Cuddles, SpiceyHuman and 10 others
Useful_Mistake said:
In Cali, yes. Does not apply to WV
Click to expand...
I expect the defense to use that even though it was in a different jurisdiction, because while it is not grounds to immediately strike down the case in WV it at least provides a strong argument for the case being dismissed, one of many strong arguments I'm sure Hardin will have. At least that's what my not-lawyer normal person brain thinks.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets, Broken Cuddles and Not a bee
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back