- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
If you cannot be oppressed, draw yourself as oppressedOf course his self insert has darker skin than him in real life. Of course.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you cannot be oppressed, draw yourself as oppressedOf course his self insert has darker skin than him in real life. Of course.
If you cannot be oppressed, draw yourself as oppressed
Yea he's not funny, his comics are boring and he looks like a beardless neckbeard but, I don't think he's got anything on Dobs in terms of lameness. I mean his replies to people's critiques bore me out. He's just not interesting.
He is like dobson in his deviantart eraYeah, I think he is an asshole but not exactly stupid or self destructive as Dobby. He has not scared his audience to the point of no return as Dobson did.
>strawman comics
>eyebrow gymnastics
>self inserts
>cannot take criticism
>will make a paragraph after paragraph reply to simple statements like "lol arms shouldn't bend that way"
renamed the title into something that means he is a lot like dobby except less spergy.I will say this descriptions in particular is regular self serving and jerkass web comic creator modus operandi. And being Dobby 2.0 would mean being worse than current age Dobby.
Given that ItsWalky is a huge SJW who I suspect was one of like 2 guys in his school that took Womens/Gender/whatever studies (or alternatively spent WAY too much time on Tumblr), it's sort of like Assigned Male's confusing, self-contradictory pro-SJW messages. This one in question appears to be concerning the amount of girls' content comic books and how they're not "awful" (except for one that was apparently written by a candidate for How To Catch A Predator). And Lucy is being a typical Willis Strawman by claiming her opinions about comics were formed by reading Tumblr. It's a confusing mess of a message, as per usual.I can't understand what any of his comics are trying to say. Can someone fluent in autism translate
Honestly, that describes a lot of comic artists. Frankly, I think that the comments about "wtf is wrong with those fingers" (or whatever) seemed nit-picky, as even in his decline, he still draws better than I think most people (though what those drawings are is another issue).He is like dobson in his deviantart era
>raging SJW
>strawman comics
>eyebrow gymnastics
>self inserts
>cannot take criticism
>complains about DC being sexist all the time
>will make a paragraph after paragraph reply to simple statements like "lol arms shouldn't bend that way"
I guess he can be considered good as a deviantart user, but when it comes to legit comic artists from DC or marvel, he ain't much.Honestly, that describes a lot of comic artists. Frankly, I think that the comments about "wtf is wrong with those fingers" (or whatever) seemed nit-picky, as even in his decline, he still draws better than I think most people (though what those drawings are is another issue).
However, both artists suffer from a general lack of improvement (never moving beyond amateurish-looking stuff), and attacking those who point that out. At least Willis hasn't shown a marked decline. Yet.
I don't think he's the next Dobson but... maybe the next Sophie labelle.
What Walky things he looks like
what he actually looks like
That or Nick Bate with a shave and a bad haircut.Yea he's not funny, his comics are boring and he looks like a beardless neckbeard
it's cause he only inserted about half his weightBroken link (or it was before I responded at least).
But he looks nothing like his kawaii self-insert.
View attachment 54467