💤 Inactive Deeker - The Diaperman Devoted to Diaperboys

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
123pc94.jpg

[/spoilers]
Yep, adorbs.
 
Babyfur and cubfur art is usually drawn well and USUALLY doesn't have sexual overtones.

anything that can be associated with furries is by its very nature deviantly sexual and filled with endless amounts of semen. to say that furry art of any kind isn't sexual is to deny the very concept of furart itself.

 
Babyfur and cubfur art is usually drawn well and USUALLY doesn't have sexual overtones.
I'm sorry, but when someone draws something like this:
caught_persian_by_tehfingerpainta-d64g6p7.png

Or this:
1530617_310139075849378_1931118_n.jpg

I'm just not going to believe that statement. Since furries are a) normally terrible at art, and b) are unbelievably terrible at hiding their fetishes.
 
I'll never understand infantilists. They're so obsessed with childish characters that crap themselves.
 
Days after we had confetti for Nick Bate getting party vanned may not have been the best time to attempt to defend babbyfurs.

Just sayin'
 
Back
Top Bottom