UN Elon Musk offers to sell Tesla stock 'right now' if UN can show how $6 billion would solve world hunger - Because Ugandan Hookers and Somali Warlords Don't Pay For Themselves

London (CNN Business) — Elon Musk has offered to sell some of his Tesla (TSLA) stock "right now" if the UN can prove that $6 billion will solve world hunger.

His comments came after UN World Food Programme (WFP) director David Beasley challenged the ultra-wealthy — and in particular the world's two richest men Jeff Bezos and Musk — to "step up now, on a one-time basis" to help solve world hunger in an interview with CNN last week.

"$6 billion to help 42 million people that are literally going to die if we don't reach them. It's not complicated," Beasley said on CNN's Connect the World program with Becky Anderson. That sum would equate to roughly 2% of Musk's net wealth.

Posting on Twitter on Sunday, the Tesla chief executive said: "If WFP can describe on this Twitter thread exactly how $6 billion will solve world hunger, I will sell Tesla stock right now and do it."

"But it must be open source accounting, so the public sees precisely how the money is spent," he added.


Beasley replied to Musk's post on Twitter, saying he could assure the billionaire that the WFP had the systems in place for transparency and open source accounting.

"Your team can review and work with us to be totally confident of such," he said.

"$6 billion will not solve world hunger...

LIES.jpg

...but it WILL prevent geopolitical instability, mass migration and save 42 million people on the brink of starvation. An unprecedented crisis and a perfect storm due to Covid/conflict/climate crises," he added.

Addressing the billionaires directly in the CNN interview, he said: "What if it was your daughter starving to death? What if it was your family starving to death? Just, wake up, smell the coffee and help."

As of Monday, Musk had a net worth of $311 billion, according to Bloomberg's Billionaire Index, making him the richest man in the world.

The net worth of US billionaires has almost doubled since the pandemic began, standing at $5.04 trillion in October, according to progressive groups Institute for Policy Studies and Americans for Tax Fairness.

Last week, Tesla became the sixth company in US history to be worth $1 trillion and the second fastest to achieve that milestone after Facebook (FB).


If Elon Musk's daughter was starving and the WFP were involved, she'd probably just starve to death, or get a train run on her by some Blue Helmets in exchange for a bag of rice.

LIES01.jpg
 
How is Musk misrepresenting the issue?

Even if it's 6 billion for 42 million people - that's $143 per person before that amount is "taxed" by the UN, the UN's "non profit" partners, the local government receiving the food and, possibly, the "warlord" in charge of the area.

Even if you fed each person for $1 dollar a day (they eat nothing but 2kcal of rice forever) - it would only last a little more than a year and that's in a perfect world where 100% of the money goes to the "hungry".

If anything, the UN Director is misrepresenting the issue by framing it as "solve world hunger" when he clarified on twitter it was "preventing geopolitical instability" which is a codeword for "dirty money for our NGO friends".
To be fair, it's CNN that's (gasp surprise shock) misrepresenting things, and this dude did say the headline is inaccurate. But I do notice he didn't tell CNN to fix it.
 
I think the problem is that world hunger is too big to solve unless you can guarantee that every scrap is shared equally. The problem not only stems from leverage (eg: a warlord holding food hostage due to political tensions), but because the amount of bureaucracy needed to organize farmers and distributors is staggering and inefficient.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Eh, keep the money.

If Musk smells his shekels, nothing new happens.

If nignogs get more food, their population multiplies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
He's a socialist, just not *that* kind of socialist :tomgirl:
Yeah, he's the kind of socialist who believes in free market capitalism. That's literally what it's all about - Maximizing the amount of production by putting resources into the hands of the most enterprising through free market rewards, then use that excess production to do the most possible good. Some people fall through the cracks, but 99.9% of people are better off. Socialism is about maximizing the number of people who get resources, at the expense of production, so that you can take care of that last 0.1% at the expense of the other 99.9% of people being considerably worse off since there's less to go around, even with everyone getting a piece.
 
Back