Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who would win in a fight?

  • Ethan Klein

    Votes: 291 3.9%
  • Sam Hyde

    Votes: 7,174 96.1%

  • Total voters
    7,465
Correct me if im wrong but Kaceytron doesnt seem to deserve this? I mean her streaming career ended many years ago andd she streams to roughly a hundred or so people while obliterating her brain with bong rips. Like she would have reacted to anything, she didn't even know what she was watching. has she been vocal about any of this regarding his kids and palestine or whatever?
Im sure she’ll get away with a public apology. Similar to Billy Mitchell and the crippled YouTuber that killed himself.
 
Didn't he claim no one could predict who it was going to be about? I guess true since I never heard of the Kacey person, but in general it's the same Hasan orbiters he has been bitching about for months.

I was hoping to actually be surprised. Ethan suing his enemies is the least surprising shit.
I didn't follow any of this shit so couldn't accurately say whether I would be able to predict his next move. The people he targeted aren't very surprising I would guess more that the angle he has chosen is somewhat unique.

As a point of reference Sam Hyde/MDE gave restreamers and editing channels an ultimatum: either give us a cut of the profits you make off of our hard work or we'll copyright strike your shit (they did also hire one or two of the best editors full time I believe). I don't really see how that is unfair.
 
I have only one thing to say

1750364959768.webp
 
Can't wait to see them all posture to their outraged fanbases for a while before folding and issuing apologies to try and get out of any trouble.
You assume he will let them fold. He wants his money back. Their word is garbage and they will renig on any apology. They should be broken and made examples of.
 
I’m reading the Denims one and this is one of the strangest complaints I’ve ever read. I see his main point—she is infringing on content while doing so explicitly to siphon views and without transforming it in accordance with the law. But it’s written like it’s intended to be read on one of Ethan Klein’s streams, not like it’s intended to be a serious lawsuit. It’s filled with things that are irrelevant and comprise Reddit-tier snark. There’s a section comparing Hasan Piker to a pro-Nazi Muslim figure from history.

This could be narrowed down and squeezed into 10 to 20 pages of a legitimate complaint. But as is, I really think part of the purpose is for him to read it on stream.
It doesnt matter though, you can write it any way you want, it doesnt detract from the claim.
 
People just wholesale posting entire videos and not doing transformative works or providing commentary has never been protected under fair use. People may not like that but that's what fair use is for.
I hate to even bring it up because despite my own personal misgivings with him on here I don't want to give Josh more legal headaches to deal with, but how much paywalled content from cows is posted here in full? I'd wager there's at least a few DMCA worthy examples. And to pre-empt this criticism, I tottally agree that's different from react streamers, but are you so sure that's a legal distinction that's gonna be made if the judge rules for Ethan here?
 
Suing irrelevant people who have no motion is his big reveal? And people here are actually glazing him for this?
With Jews you win bro, Ethan's based now, don't think about the larger implications here, just succumb to niggerbrained instant gratification that he's epically BTFOing irrelevant streamers he has a personal beef of his own making with.

I LOVE JEWS
 
I hate to even bring it up because despite my own personal misgivings with him on here I don't want to give Josh more legal headaches to deal with, but how much paywalled content from cows is posted here in full? I'd wager there's at least a few DMCA worthy examples. And to pre-empt this criticism, I tottally agree that's different from react streamers, but are you so sure that's a legal distinction that's gonna be made if the judge rules for Ethan here?
People discuss things here for the purpose of criticism though and make transformative works. He has removed shit in the past if they file a proper DMCA notice.

If there's a thread about a particular person and people discuss that person then sharing a piece of content they're making and saying "god damn that bitch fat and the camera quality is shit, she looks like she lives in a hovel" is covered under fair-use laws.

I don't want to take too much space in this thread about DMCA shit but the reason its results in automatic takedowns on most platforms (including YouTube) is because the receiving company doesn't want to deal with problems and they have a very short window to decide on whether to comply or not.
 
Back