Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

[Gaydolf Nigler]

Nice to see Ethan go against people with the same quality of character that he has. Of course, he will never actually rise above these people.

 

[Sithis]

Never thought I'd be rooting for an actually jewish copyright jew but here we are in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty five

 

[Jose Beaner Luna]

View attachment 7531420
leftism not even once

Weed turned her into a female version of Nova Online.

 

[Thomas Talus]

at worst Ethan insisted on it and it's as spergy as you read it as.

He did say he was going to show us how to create generational wealth, for his lawyer.

 

[Nardvark]

I agree with thinking that Hasan won't lift a finger to defend his groupies, but I'm also of the mind that Hasan's nearly incapable of keeping his mouth shut. I don't know how, but I so badly want Hasan to do something retarded as a clapback, and give Ethan's prosecution more to work with

 

[AnOminous]

You mess with the jew you get the lawyers

The Jewish martial art: sue-jitsu.

 

[Fox Girl Enjoyer]

It’s hard for me to buy into the “this will destroy all free use!” Doomers. I would maybe agree if he cast a huge net and also went after people like XQC and Asmongold.

But, the bar he’s established here is extremely high. He is exclusively targeting people that pretty explicitly said “come watch me watch this video so you won’t give H3 views and ad revenue.” You have to be extremely stupid to do this, even XQC is smarter. He’ll spin slots while playing brainrot to keep his ADHD child fanbase mentally stimulated, but he would never admit a malicious intent to deprive the creator of ad revenue.

Like imagine if someone went live on twitch and streamed the entire newest Star Wars movie, beginning and ending the stream with “thanks for watching with me so you aren’t giving Disney any money.” Everyone would expect Disney to immediately unleash their lawyers to assfuck that streamer and they would be permanently banned from Twitch. Everyone already knows this is what would happen, that person already passed the generally understood line of what is currently considered acceptable.

Maybe I don’t know enough about the legal system, but the precedent this lawsuit would set seems to be “don’t be a retard and openly admit you are view sharking with a malicious intent.”

The truth is ALL react content runs afoul of copyright. The content they produce isn't transformative enough. Just saying "oh wow" or "really" every 5 minutes isn't good enough. And shit like Hasan just going to the bathroom is just blatant.

I'm hoping this lawsuit will really put a stop to react content since all three of them were guilty of doing this shit. As I understand it, there is a matter of degree the court considers so having most of the video just being your little head in the corner probably isn't enough. The malicious thing isn't even a requirement. You can use Youtube analytics to show that they were stealing views from you. Ethan may only have to have a higher bar since Asmongold watching his video won't impact it as H3H3 has over a million subs. Someone with less than 100K subs could easily go after the likes of Hasan, Asmongold and xQC as they can flood the algorithm with their video. So there can be real ripple effects, especially in regards to specific actions. The days of having your chair tag you out could be over (thank God).

 

[AnOminous]

The truth is ALL react content runs afoul of copyright. The content they produce isn't transformative enough. Just saying "oh wow" or "really" every 5 minutes isn't good enough.

That's not really true in my opinion, although I do agree with the "oh wow" and "really" shit not cutting the mustard in a fair use analysis.

 

[KriegsZensur]

The Jewish martial art: sue-jitsu.

I thought it was krav MAGA.

 

[KKWatDo]

How do these grifting niggers justify asking for hundreds of thousands of dollars in order to be shielded from the consequences of their actions, instead of that money going to children in Gaza? I guess they have no actual principles or morals. Shocking.

You haven't seen the worst. There's a shit content creator who's friends with Hasan and his orbiters who gets 5x the views shitting on H3 as he does talking about politics so he's pivoted into solely shitting on H3 who literally said to not donate to Palestine and instead donate to Frogan, Denims, and Kaceytron:

 

[Sammich]

Correct me if im wrong but Kaceytron doesnt seem to deserve this

Hope she sees this bro.

 

[natural born loser]

"When a devil gets caught by a monster, I, as a human being, can only hope that they both die."

 

[Lonely khan]

Predictions:

Denims - Folds
Kaceytron - Folds
Frogman - Drags it through court with no sign of settling

Ethan should offer Hijabba a withdrawl of the lawsuit if she removes the hijab, burns a Quran and gets a tattoo of the prophet Muhammed holding a star of David over his head.

I want to see how far she is willing to take her fake Muslim persona when money is on the line.

Kaceytron probably offered that deal to Ethan already and Denims would have if she was smart enough to conceive it.

It was probably fake, its illegal to burn money, doing on camera on the video where you talk about suing people would be exceptionally retarded.

It is probably cheaper to just burn a dollar than buy a fake.

im sure frivolous lawsuits aimed at goyim poorer than him will really help in ethan's continuous fight against rising wave of antisemitism in the west

This but in earnest

That's an edited picture. It's using Faceapp's makeup removal tool on a picture where she doesn't have makeup on, so it overcompensates and makes her look like a ghoul. This is the original:
View attachment 7532552

Is there one that doesn't make her look like a ghoul?

 

[Fox Girl Enjoyer]

That's not really true in my opinion, although I do agree with the "oh wow" and "really" shit not cutting the mustard in a fair use analysis.

As I understand it, the courts kind of look at a degree for which it was transformative and the degree to which the normal "react" video is transformative is a big issue. The problem as I see it with react content is they are playing the video from start to finish and adding in commentary here and there. There is almost no editing and a good portion of the "react" is just the video and not their commentary. Its a genre that's always been at risk of getting sued over and then having the courts determine what is transformative and what isn't. Sargon won his copyright case but Sargon also edited his videos and often he was meaningfully responding to what was being shown (and I'm not even sure these videos he did were the full video). These guys are just on a livestream, pressing play and maybe sometime adding meaningful discussion (very rarely).

Though I think the fact we agree on the latter point just shows how slop "reactions" have become. I miss when it was BABIES REACT TO TWO GIRLS ONE CUP. Simpler times.

 

[AssignedEva]

Honestly though, this lawsuit thing just seems like an expensive stunt. I could see there being a case here but the yassss queen slay language talking about people being 'wasted' or 'larping' is just unprofessional. There's a time and a place and the courts is not it for being sassy.

Credit where credit is due, filing copyright on a video before uploading it to use as a honeypot was an actually smart move. It's obvious that this is not in any way about the ethics of react streaming (given Ethan's prior lawsuits essentially emboldened the genre) - his whole handwringing thing about "I'm just trying to avoid a big film studio damaging the react community" comes across as comically disingenuous. His reason for this is to get back at the audience he courted who now criticise him for being a Zionist (when he was warned about this very thing). He's also flagged that now he's filed a complaint, he has an excuse to subpoena reddit to dox the snark sub moderators.

Nevertheless I think it's essentially an open and shut case. The shitpost quality of his complaints might weaken it, but it's hard to argue that people streaming his content while specifically saying they're doing so to reduce Ethan's revenue and then also profiting off of it is hard to refute. This is going to have a huge impact and I don't like the potential implications on us being able to mirror/archive videos on the farms.

 

[Local Farmer]

They forgot the most critical element when attacking Ethan, that he’s Jewish

 

[Orkeosaurus]

Could they not just argue that by being the subject of the video their reacting to it is transformative? Saying they need so and so many words per video to fulfill fair use is kike shit. I mean I wouldn't piss on reactors if they were on fire but this is the argument I'd want made in court.

Also Ethan is one of the few in his sphere that actually have a crew to keep things moving when things are slow. It's like for instance, if im watching king cobrajfs do a video responce and he gets up to piss and puts shon on the chair is that not transformative? Shon rules. For all I know Hasan's chair is a beloved meme.

 

[Cat On Keyboard]

I stop checking this thread for two weeks and this happens. The reeeeeeeing from the snark subs will be glorious.

 

[Bukke Bruse]

Kaceytrons stream is like a feverdream, but she had me laughing with this insane ramble. She hates condoms and the lawsuit could setback her boyfriend getting a vasectomy and her safely getting raw loads

Highlighted from the end of the clip:

 

[yoursavior]

Could they not just argue that by being the subject of the video their reacting to it is transformative? Saying they need so and so many words per video to fulfill fair use is kike shit. I mean I wouldn't piss on reactors if they were on fire but this is the argument I'd want made in court.

Also Ethan is one of the few in his sphere that actually have a crew to keep things moving when things are slow. It's like for instance, if im watching king cobrajfs do a video responce and he gets up to piss and puts shon on the chair is that not transformative? Shon rules. For all I know Hasan's chair is a beloved meme.

18 minutes of commentary for a near 2 hour video isn't what I'd call transformative, plus clips of them explicitly saying they're doing so to siphon money from Ethan.

Do you retards just comment without looking into this or what?