FB 10/6 - A philosophical question

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Goochole said:
His mullestache and barb bowl cut make this picture just perfect.

A potpourri of the deranged.

Stairway to heaven or highway to hell? Looking at this picture both look to be a pleasant escape from all of this.
Click to expand...
He's actually gotten worse, but the one thing that will never change is that big gulp filled with soda in the foreground.
 
It's not like Chris would ever bother to climb a stairway or ladder to Heaven. Fatty breaks a sweat just climbing out of his hole to get Mamma some more nanners,
 
I get the feeling Chris thinks he's being clever, or perhaps cute, by posting shit like this. Not that anyone other than us Kiwis actually care mind you. But I'm sure Chris sees other people posting cute, funny or playful posts that completely go over his head, so he thinks "why can't I do that?" And then he goes and posts some confusing piece of autistic drivel thinking it's brilliant.
 
I have a philosophical question to open for Chris: if you could cure one, both of which may help lead into the path towards lukewarm success as a human; would you take the autism or the narcissism denialism cure?

Perhaps one method towards success is easier than the other? Or perhaps the task of denying one with such white knight asspatting would be more difficult than at least pretending to not be a petty egoist?

Perhaps your individual answer may say something about you as a person. A lot to think about.
 
Ebola said:
I have a philosophical question to open for Chris: if you could cure one, both of which may help lead into the path towards lukewarm success as a human; would you take the autism or the narcissism denialism cure?

Perhaps one method towards success is easier than the other? Or perhaps the task of denying one with such white knight asspatting would be more difficult than at least pretending to not be a petty egoist?

Perhaps your individual answer may say something about you as a person. A lot to think about.
Click to expand...

I think the answer is unfortunately quite obvious. He would choose autism, as anyone in that nuanced situation would, because the narcissism would cause him to be unaware of his larger faults by way of the Sin of Pride.
 
Ebola said:
I have a philosophical question to open for Chris: if you could cure one, both of which may help lead into the path towards lukewarm success as a human; would you take the autism or the narcissism denialism cure?

Perhaps one method towards success is easier than the other? Or perhaps the task of denying one with such white knight asspatting would be more difficult than at least pretending to not be a petty egoist?

Perhaps your individual answer may say something about you as a person. A lot to think about.
Click to expand...

Autism. Denying you have narcissism is usually something you should do. There are no benefits of autism.
 
Jack Haywood said:
Jesus Christ, the level of pretension here... :'( This, coming from somebody who'd probably confuse Plato with Pluto. Assuming he's even aware about the latter.
Click to expand...

The level of hypertension is probably more palpable, imo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom