Careercow Glinner / Graham Linehan - Disgraced Comedian, Mentally Ill to the point of worrying his Family, Hypocritical Misogynist, TERF ANTIFA Quasimodo Doppelganger w/ One Ball & Hateboner for GAMERS/Trump/Brexit/Count Dankula; #ThanksGraham

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Back in the days of yore, Glinner was part of the Sarah Butts defence force, they were always in each other's mentions via Twitter circle-jerks.

I've often wondered if Glinner's about turn on the whole Trans thing was something connected to getting too close to the Butt's Final Fantasy server of pedo-depravity and that he went scorched-earth to try and make-up for him being a fanatical defender even in the face of the Breibart expose on Butts.

But that's just a theory.
A Game(rGate) Theory.
I don’t think he was ever really in on the troon thing. He was one of the first people, other than Germain Greer, I can remember vocally being against it and rightfully highlighted the safe guarding issue. It was him and his The Mess We’re In podcast that started me peaking from “live and let live” to “holy fuck, they’re dangerous sex pests!”

He does still believe in “true trans” though. I wonder how that rubs certain people on that side the wrong way.

Plus him being a bit of a twat doesn’t him, but each day he seems a bit more humbled and I honestly think there’s hope for him.
 
I don’t think he was ever really in on the troon thing. He was one of the first people, other than Germain Greer, I can remember vocally being against it and rightfully highlighted the safe guarding issue. It was him and his The Mess We’re In podcast that started me peaking from “live and let live” to “holy fuck, they’re dangerous sex pests!”

He does still believe in “true trans” though. I wonder how that rubs certain people on that side the wrong way.

Plus him being a bit of a twat doesn’t him, but each day he seems a bit more humbled and I honestly think there’s hope for him.

He was fanatical in his defense of Sarah Butts though; we were all far-right bigots for calling out the pedo-server. I wish better archives existed for this time (2013-14), and my memory wasn't so addled.

The thing is, for Glinner to have been so close to a trans person who was outed as a pedo, and to keep defending them even after all the evidence came out, well you'd think that would be some 'evidence' he'd cite continually about how the evil troons tricked him.

But no, the whole Sarah Butt's thing got memory holed, and like I said it was big news at the time, I think it had several different Briebart articles. The best I can find now is a few vague KIA (Kotaku In Action) reddit threads from a decade ago.
 
I don’t think he was ever really in on the troon thing. He was one of the first people, other than Germain Greer, I can remember vocally being against it and rightfully highlighted the safe guarding issue.
Actual TERFs, in its real meaning of radical feminists who rejected troonery (and often men entirely), have been around since the '70s. I remember a TERF magazine called Dyke that published articles about troons just being perverted men. I haven't seen the magazine itself, just a cover from one of their issues with anti-troon stuff in it.

It's just that troonery was such an incredibly niche thing until recently that I think the vast majority of people went their whole lives never having even seen a troon in public much less interacted with one.
 
Actual TERFs, in its real meaning of radical feminists who rejected troonery (and often men entirely), have been around since the '70s. I remember a TERF magazine called Dyke that published articles about troons just being perverted men. I haven't seen the magazine itself, just a cover from one of their issues with anti-troon stuff in it.

It's just that troonery was such an incredibly niche thing until recently that I think the vast majority of people went their whole lives never having even seen a troon in public much less interacted with one.
I know quite a bit of second wave radfem theory from university. They had the troons mostly right. Their issue, like Graham’s, was that they were such unlikeable nut cases on both other issues and how they acted that they were easy to ignore.

Then the third wave came and they forgot what a woman was they ushered the men into their bathrooms hoping it was just other women who got raped.
 
I've often wondered if Glinner's about turn on the whole Trans thing was something connected to getting too close to the Butt's Final Fantasy server of pedo-depravity and that he went scorched-earth to try and make-up for him being a fanatical defender even in the face of the Breibart expose on Butts.
By his own admission (in his autobiography and in numerous livestreams), what started his turn against troons was him tweeting while high on painkillers after surgery to remove one of his balls. He dug his heels in when they demanded he do the very same kind of apology tour that Linehan himself spent his career demanding of his peers whenever they stepped an inch out of line.

Linehan got to the right conclusion, but only out of a drug-addled accident.
 
Glinner got a mention on crazydaysandnights:
1736976248932.png
sauce
archive
 
Excuse me, as I am just a humble retard.

-Glinner writes an unactionable article about Paisley
-A third party, Ferguson, makes hyperbolic comment about Paisley in response to article
-Glinner responds, indicating he does not approve Fergusons comment. Wishes not to be sued.
-Paisley sues Glinner for defamatory statement of third party, Ferguson.
-Judge concurs Glinner is at fault for third party statement because he didn't delete Fergusons comment.

This is how the law works in England? What if the conversation was verbal? What if it was all graffiti on Glinners fence? WTF is going on here?
 
Last edited:
Excuse me, as I am just a humble retard.

-Glinner writes an unactionable article about Paisley
-A third party, Ferguson, makes hyperbolic comment about Paisley in response to article
-Glinner responds, indicating he does not approve Fergusons comment. Wishes not to be sued.
-Paisley sues Glinner for defamatory statement of third party, Ferguson.
-Judge concurs Glinner is at fault for third party statement because he didn't delete Fergusons comment.

This is how the law works in England? What if the conversation was verbal? What if it was all graffiti on Glinners fence? WTF is going on here?
There's no Section 230 here and libel law greatly favours the person doing the suing, that's why we're a popular country for people to bring libel suits. I think Glinner's fuckup was that he got into it with Ferguson instead of just jannying the comments.
 
There's no Section 230 here and libel law greatly favours the person doing the suing, that's why we're a popular country for people to bring libel suits. I think Glinner's fuckup was that he got into it with Ferguson instead of just jannying the comments.
Glinner indicated that he knew it was potentially libelous though
From your perspective that’s him being responsible
From the court’s perspective that seems to be more like “you knew better but left it up anyway” making it extra bad

This is like Exulansic telling her followers to stop harassing [tranny] - it shows she knows she’s influencing them and that believes she impacts their behavior, it’s basically a self own in a lot of ways

As a side note just be careful what you put in writing in general

A lot of times it’s better just not to put something in writing

Some politician in the UK is in trouble for racist comments he made in a WhatsApp group (Labour Party member)

Some hockey players got in trouble for jokes in a WhatsApp group a few years ago

Politicians and athletes probably always made off color jokes etc but in the 1970s it was verbal and not in writing which preserves for posterity

Be careful what you put in writing esp with your real name or identifier like your phone number attached to it
 
Trannies are freaks. All autistic. Sick of them. It's like the N bomb, someone needs to draw the line and say "those over there on that side are nigs, and those over there on the other side of the line are black people".

We all know the trannies that deserve to be viciously mocked, it's the self important narcy freak autists and pedo trannies that warrant targeting. The fact they are crossdressing is partly just a good vessel through which to attack them. If they could get their own word Graham could slander and defame them ad nauseum without offending innocent people with a mental illness or getting sued...
 
Tranny hands typed this.
Mr Glinerham isn't much better tbh than the trannies he now spends his life tweeting about.

He went from being a respected comedy writer to one big lanky joke. His wife left with the kids, theaters won't show a Father Ted musical unless his name is completely removed from it, he's currently getting screwed in the civil courts and no one besides a few TERFs take him seriously anymore.

Apparently he plans to pack up and move to the US, good riddance.
 
Paisley's a faggot but he's not a TRA, he just doesn't shoot down troons all the time like glinner wants, hilarious really. glinner's defo getting raped financially over literaly nothing.
He's a gay Scottish actor, not a big one he has roles in lesser known crap. He is a trans ally (or "TRA" whatever the fuck you want to call it), he doesn't have a big presence on social media any more after being hounded off it by TERFs after Scottish TERF Marion Millar got charged for being a creepy fuck and stalking him at his workplace and online. So instead he took his activism to the civil court to make a fool of linehan who is already a laughing stock.

Something I'm noticing in all this, TERFs all like to pretend they are on the side of gay people, or defending gay rights and that "trannies are homophobic because they erase gay people" or some shit like that and we have JK-Rowling funded orgs like the "LGB Alliance" setup now to harass gay people under the guise of "gay rights". But notice how anytime a gay person (including Paisley) come out in support of trannies they become the subject of a TERF witch hunt.

iMO I don't think humans can change sex and I think trannies are odd people, yes, but what I don't agree with and wish to call out is the pretence that trannies are "erasing gay people" or "bad for gay rights". The T has been with and fought alongside the LGB for a long time and trannies are welcome in any gay bar or pride event in the country.

Here's another pic of Linehan in his racing car bed having a cry over the fact Jk Rowling won't tweet about him.

g.png
 
Last edited:
He's a gay Scottish actor, not a big one he has roles in lesser known crap. He is a trans ally (or "TRA" whatever the fuck you want to call it), he doesn't have a big presence on social media any more after being hounded off it by TERFs after Scottish TERF Marion Millar got charged for being a creepy fuck and stalking him at his workplace and online. So instead he took his activism to the civil court to make a fool of linehan who is already a laughing stock.

Something I'm noticing in all this, TERFs all like to pretend they are on the side of gay people, or defending gay rights and that "trannies are homophobic because they erase gay people" or some shit like that and we have JK-Rowling funded orgs like the "LGB Alliance" setup now to harass gay people under the guise of "gay rights". But notice how anytime a gay person (including Paisley) come out in support of trannies they become the subject of a TERF witch hunt.

iMO I don't think humans can change sex and I think trannies are odd people, yes, but what I don't agree with and wish to call out is the pretence that trannies are "erasing gay people" or "bad for gay rights". The T has been with and fought alongside the LGB for a long time and trannies are welcome in any gay bar or pride event in the country.


Do you have proof that JK funds the lgb alliance ?

Troons believe same sex attraction is transphobic, so that’s pretty well gay erasure and equally bad for gay rights Shirley ?
 
Back