Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 15.3%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 52 11.9%
  • This Year

    Votes: 71 16.2%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 146 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 101 23.1%

  • Total voters
    437
I thought he can't dismiss at this point, and the only way to make it gone is with a mutual agreement with defendant.
The plaintiff can agree to stop any time they want. Of course at this stage Null could then move for a dismissal with prejudice and fees.

In addition to this, there would be a strong argument that Russ is rage-quitting because he thinks the only way he can get a win in is in Utah. Russ has admitted himself that FL litigation would be difficult. Hardin could take Russ' own words and turn them back on him to call it malicious and forum shopping. Added to that, Russ is the one who started this, and him dropping it when it gets hard, only to re-file is classic abuse of the system for harassment.

(Of course we all know that different districts in the American court are enough to decide a case one way or another due to political winds, but everyone ignores that and is supposed to operate under the assumption that 'justice' can be had in any court if the rules are followed.)
 
Hardin could take Russ' own words and turn them back on him to call it malicious and forum shopping.
I was just thinking it would be hilarious if Russell filed his own motion to transfer and Hardin made all the same arguments (but better) about why a case shouldn't be transferred, forum shopping and prejudicial and all that, only for the judge to say "Hardin responded with literally anything by the deadline so the motion to transfer is defeated!"

Can you imagine how Russ would freak!
 
I was just thinking it would be hilarious if Russell filed his own motion to transfer and Hardin made all the same arguments (but better) about why a case shouldn't be transferred, forum shopping and prejudicial and all that, only for the judge to say "Hardin responded with literally anything by the deadline so the motion to transfer is defeated!"

Can you imagine how Russ would freak!
There are mechanisms in place to prevent "ping ponging" of a case back and forth between courts. Once transferred it stays there
 
There are mechanisms in place to prevent "ping ponging" of a case back and forth between courts. Once transferred it stays there
Your puny mechanisms of “precedent” stands no chance! It’s going to go through all circuits including the secret 0th circuit before coming back to the 10th!
 
There are mechanisms in place to prevent "ping ponging" of a case back and forth between courts. Once transferred it stays there
Especially since the only reason this case is now in Florida, by the Utah Courts own ruling is because Greer failed to provide the court any guidance as to why it shouldn't be in Florida.

You can always overturn a Judges insane ramblings. Over turning your own legal neglect is a lot harder. This is something Vic Mignogna found out.
 
It's the British.
Russ would believe that. He seems to think that since some kiwis are from the UK, that therefore his "harassers" are all British trolls. That whole region is controlling his destiny, and his penis.

Of course, Russ also once unironically mentioned "The Canadian SCOTUS" so I'm pretty sure his knowledge of law doesn't extend far outside Utah small claims court.
 
Russ would believe that. He seems to think that since some kiwis are from the UK, that therefore his "harassers" are all British trolls. That whole region is controlling his destiny, and his penis.

Of course, Russ also once unironically mentioned "The Canadian SCOTUS" so I'm pretty sure his knowledge of law doesn't extend far outside Utah small claims court.
You could argue that there is a Mexican SCOTUS because they’re the United States of Mexico. But it’s more properly Supreme Court of Justice of the (birth of a) Nation. Canada isn’t a real country and doesn’t have real laws or judges.

If we are in for a Russ-powered argument that depends on referencing British common law we may be in for something more amazing and amusing and infuriating than niggers trying to quote admiralty law.
 
SCOTUS references British common law all the time.
Yes, child, but there is a slight (minuscule, you have to be quite educated to notice it) difference between even a Ketanji writing and a Russ one. That slight difference is where the enjoyment is.

Also I just want to see Russ pronounce "British". It'd solve the western droughts instantly.
 
While we're all waiting for the trial and to celebrate Acerthorn joining Greer, in filing copyright-related legal nonsense against the Farms, I made this commemorative masterpiece.
sketch-1712001072301.png
 
Back