- Joined
- Nov 11, 2016
if he just dismisses it he can't blame the bias judgeWhich is a bad plan for him. He's the plaintiff. This can go away any time he wants.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if he just dismisses it he can't blame the bias judgeWhich is a bad plan for him. He's the plaintiff. This can go away any time he wants.
I thought he can't dismiss at this point, and the only way to make it gone is with a mutual agreement with defendant.if he just dismisses it he can't blame the bias judge
The plaintiff can agree to stop any time they want. Of course at this stage Null could then move for a dismissal with prejudice and fees.I thought he can't dismiss at this point, and the only way to make it gone is with a mutual agreement with defendant.
I thought he can't dismiss at this point, and the only way to make it gone is with a mutual agreement with defendant.
The plaintiff can agree to stop any time they want. Of course at this stage Null could then move for a dismissal with prejudice and fees.
I was just thinking it would be hilarious if Russell filed his own motion to transfer and Hardin made all the same arguments (but better) about why a case shouldn't be transferred, forum shopping and prejudicial and all that, only for the judge to say "Hardin responded with literally anything by the deadline so the motion to transfer is defeated!"Hardin could take Russ' own words and turn them back on him to call it malicious and forum shopping.
There are mechanisms in place to prevent "ping ponging" of a case back and forth between courts. Once transferred it stays thereI was just thinking it would be hilarious if Russell filed his own motion to transfer and Hardin made all the same arguments (but better) about why a case shouldn't be transferred, forum shopping and prejudicial and all that, only for the judge to say "Hardin responded with literally anything by the deadline so the motion to transfer is defeated!"
Can you imagine how Russ would freak!
Your puny mechanisms of “precedent” stands no chance! It’s going to go through all circuits including the secret 0th circuit before coming back to the 10th!There are mechanisms in place to prevent "ping ponging" of a case back and forth between courts. Once transferred it stays there
Especially since the only reason this case is now in Florida, by the Utah Courts own ruling is because Greer failed to provide the court any guidance as to why it shouldn't be in Florida.There are mechanisms in place to prevent "ping ponging" of a case back and forth between courts. Once transferred it stays there
It's the British.the secret 0th circuit
Russ would believe that. He seems to think that since some kiwis are from the UK, that therefore his "harassers" are all British trolls. That whole region is controlling his destiny, and his penis.It's the British.
You could argue that there is a Mexican SCOTUS because they’re the United States of Mexico. But it’s more properly Supreme Court of Justice of the (birth of a) Nation. Canada isn’t a real country and doesn’t have real laws or judges.Russ would believe that. He seems to think that since some kiwis are from the UK, that therefore his "harassers" are all British trolls. That whole region is controlling his destiny, and his penis.
Of course, Russ also once unironically mentioned "The Canadian SCOTUS" so I'm pretty sure his knowledge of law doesn't extend far outside Utah small claims court.
SCOTUS references British common law all the time.If we are in for a Russ-powered argument that depends on referencing British common law
We like their law, just not being told to follow it by them. Sacked York and everything over it, just like all the best freedom fighters.SCOTUS references British common law all the time.
No, stalker country, we shall make our own version of the laws. Enjoy secession.We like their law, just not being told to follow it by them. Sacked York and everything over it, just like all the best freedom fighters.
Yes, child, but there is a slight (minuscule, you have to be quite educated to notice it) difference between even a Ketanji writing and a Russ one. That slight difference is where the enjoyment is.SCOTUS references British common law all the time.
It would be more fitting that this shit-show continue on April Fool's Day, but alas, we have to wait.I misread the date. Apologies! Not till Thursday do we get our comic relief. Can’t wait tho