Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 15.3%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 52 11.9%
  • This Year

    Votes: 71 16.2%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 146 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 101 23.1%

  • Total voters
    437
Screenshot 2025-01-22 005208.png
13/30 pages are arguments, the rest are exhibits of articles about KF and random convos he had with people
 

Attachments

View attachment 6886726
13/30 pages are arguments, the rest are exhibits of articles about KF and random convos he had with people
Reading this still but he basically spends the whole document telling the Judge that he knows the law better than the Judge does, despite being an admitted moron that has no idea how even something basic like discovery works.


"Judge, it's okay. I said I that witnesses existed, not that they would actually be called in this case."
1737500155379.png


"It's Hardin's fault my witnesses said they don't know anything because he asked them. Also I dropped em because it was too much work"

1737500432304.png

Directly accuses Null of posting legal correspondence in this thread. Even though the only emails we ever see is what gets submitted as an exhibit by Hardin or Greer. Just the fucking audacity to blatantly lie in his legal documents is stunning, no matter how many times he does it.

1737500529610.png

Greer proposes the equivalent of tree-fiddy as a monetary sanction

1737500785023.png

List of things that Greer said his witnesses could testify to, none of them being fucking copyright infringement in this copyright infringement case.

1737501725867.png
 
Last edited:
But was I right? Did the judge just excoriate Greer for faking the funk on witnesses just prior? Asking because I don’t follow the Greer stuff closely and I wasn’t sure if I was confusing two things or missing something. There’s just so much to follow on the Farms
Russ has to pay Hardin for wasting his time with the fake witnesses. That's what the fee award is about.
 
Hmmm I guess Greer can prove his statement that Null posts his attorney's disclosure about the case to the Farms?

So that's why Greer is reluctant to share information with the defense, as it will just further embolden more stalking.

I guess Josh is just supposed to let Hardin do his thing without any knowledge of what Greer is doing legally?

DaFuq?

How does Russ'tard think think that will go over with the court? "Yes your honor I expect the defense to proceed without any knowledge of what I am filing because they might make fun of me with it."

Double DaFuq?
 
Back