I'm calling into question James' claim that Twomad possessed firearms because of California's horrendously dogshit gun laws which I can complain ad nauseum about, but that would be preaching to the choir.
The video and or picture that James posted was from either November or December of 2021 according to the archived post in the OP about Twomad owning guns. As far as I'm aware, Muudea's DOB is December 17th, 2000. The upload date for the video was
December 10th, 2021 [A] which would make him 20 at the time of allegedly owning what looks a Glock 17 (probably a Gen4 or Gen5). This is not legally possible because CA Penal Code § 27510
does not allow for FFLs to conduct sales to anyone under the age of 21 even when considering past modifications to this part of California law. The one exemption to this is that the person who is given control of the firearm is over the age of 21.
As for the video proof, he doesn't show the guy's papers. There's a few possibilities in this case. The pistols in question are either someone else's and Muudea was trying to show off, this was purchased from the black market, Muudea used a fake ID, or it's proof that the FFL in question knowingly violated California law. The fact that Jameskii was actually holding onto this is most likely proof that Igor was (probably) trying to blackmail Muudea. To my knowledge he hasn't filed any complaints to law enforcement in regards to a person who isn't of legal age in California possessing firearms.
That's assuming that the handgun in the video is even real to begin with, considering that Muudea and the probable FFL that would be charged were not charged with firearms related felonies under the California Penal Code it is either a replica or someone else's Glock.