Jaron Seth Bloshinsky / Jazz Jennings / I Am Jazz - Puberty Blockers: Not Even Once

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Despite the progress that's been made over the years, people STILL can't get over their son acting gay. Sometimes the dads see it as an affront to their masculinity and sometimes the moms are worried what their neighbors and friends will say. It sounds stupid but it's true. There's still a lot of prejudice when it comes to how your kids are acting in front of others.
When trooning your kid both "fixes" the issue AND gets you irrational levels of attention and pity-points, it's easy to see why people would go for that instead of just letting the poor kid be gay.
 
Why do people keep throwing this theory around? It makes no sense. Why would anyone know couldn't stand the thought of having a gay child be fine with having a trans one? People who who wouldn't want a gay child are the religious conservative type, and they would want a trans child even less than a gay one.
Reposting from another thread but:
Because overtly or subconsciously they know that this kid isn't giving them grandkids, and as human beings they're biologically wired to want grandkids? Granted, hardly anyone will actually come out and say it but when your kid refuses to procreate, your monkey brain screams that you've failed. Everything else stems from that.
Please notice that none of Jeannette's kids have children yet. My guess is that for a lot of these types of parents, transing your kids is monkeybrain "now my kid will be straight and have kids" even though it's really more of a bad coping mechanism than anything actually effective.
 
Please notice that none of Jeannette's kids have children yet.
I don't think Jeannette has noticed this either to be honest. I wonder if they even will. I wouldn't blame them if they weighed the pros and cons and decided not to have children unless Jeannette dies first, even if that means they end up never having them at all.
 
Why do people keep throwing this theory around? It makes no sense. Why would anyone know couldn't stand the thought of having a gay child be fine with having a trans one? People who who wouldn't want a gay child are the religious conservative type, and they would want a trans child even less than a gay one.
A lot of socially conscious people actually aren’t cool with their kids being a homo. A lot of gay people have been disowned when they came out even though their families have LGB allies or even have gay friends.

Iran for example forces gays to transition under the threat of death, but I would not call the Iranian government trans friendly. Suzy Green trooned her gay son, got him SRS when he was 16 (Thailand was so appalled by this they changed to laws to make this illegal), and is a raging homophobe as well. She’s Jeanette‘s sister from another mister, but with way more power to sway the government. This theory gets bought up as we already have an example of homophobic narc mom trooning a son. They are so similar it’s scary.
 
I love the part in Denim where Jazz and the chad make uncomfortable flirty eye contact. It cracks me the fuck up every time I see it.
Listen. Boys in high school, even if they've been held back, are assholes. Not all, obviously, but a good chunk of them. Especially if they're well aware how hunky they are in the eyes of others. They're not about to waste their time on confused, uncanny valley creatures like Jazz. That fantasy is, and never will be, real. The thing about guys is that they grow out of a lot of that shallow behavior, but much much later. Boys emotionally develop slower than girls after all.

So sorry, Jazz. It's not happening. You want to date a guy in your dumb tumblr movie? Pick the pudgy curly-haired nerd with glasses next time.
 
Last edited:
Why do people keep throwing this theory around? It makes no sense. Why would anyone know couldn't stand the thought of having a gay child be fine with having a trans one? People who who wouldn't want a gay child are the religious conservative type, and they would want a trans child even less than a gay one.

Many of the same conservatives that hate gays also hate trannies, but when it comes to parents, some of them feel relief to have a trans kid rather than a gay one because they can blame their sissy boy/dyke girl on a medical problem. It is not because dad's weak sperm produces limp-wristed fairy boys and not because mom coddled the little guy too much and secretly let him play with his sister's Barbies. These parents typically believe and run with people who believe that gay kids are caused by parents doing something wrong that turns their kid gay. But if they can push the narrative that the kid was actually "born in the wrong body," then it's a medical problem, the doctor can correct it and this proves the parents are blameless.

This narrative is crazy but so are these parents. Rather than risk looking like failed parents, they choose to troon out their kids because in their minds it is some twisted form of saving face.
 
They did a pretty good long term study of toy preference and later sexual orientation, and it turns out that playing with toys usually associated with the opposite sex is a pretty good indicator that kids will be bisexual or gay after puberty. No one knows why, but its a thing.

Do you know if this is true for both male and female children? I read Bailey's book The Man Who Would Be Queen (yes, the one that troons had a hissy fit over) and he emphasized that the sissyboy --> gay man pipeline was pretty solid, but the tomboy ---> lesbian one much less so. He said, and I'm paraphrasing now, that there was a 'higher than average' incidence of lesbianism amongst girls who were tomboys as kids, but it was in no way a solid predictor of adult sexual orientation as the inverse was for males.

And my own personal anecdotal experiences confirm this: the one "sissy boy" in my middle school class did end up gay, whilst the tomboys turned out straight. Every single one of them.
 
Why do people keep throwing this theory around? It makes no sense. Why would anyone know couldn't stand the thought of having a gay child be fine with having a trans one? People who who wouldn't want a gay child are the religious conservative type, and they would want a trans child even less than a gay one.
I don't know why some people think this way, but a minority of people do prefer having a hetero sterile frankenchild with a "medical disorder" to having a physically healthy gay kid, they tend to be really religious and keep it a secret as much as possible.

Jeannette definitely is narcissistic so the Why of this story would boil down to her specific pathology. She isn't bigoted against gay people from what I can tell. My opinion is that if she had a gay son twenty years earlier she would have tried to ride that wave of activism instead. She saw his potential as a "girl" as a career for herself as an activist. Everyone who met her IRL talks about how PR hungry she was right from the start. If it had just been about being transgender there was not any reason to sacrifice her kid's privacy and friendships in order to do that in the family. The book could have been written under a pseudonym, face could have been blurred while talking to barbara walters, etc. They are already rich so it isn't like they need money. But no, it was about being famous and transition was a way to accomplish that. She seems like she may have been a cruel stage mother to the other kids, who she no doubt regards as failures for turning out normal.

The alternative I could come up with is something about the way that she hates ari, but she didn't have any daughters to pit against her so jaron ended up taking that place as the family's favored girl.
 
My thing was dinosaurs, Pokemon, super heroes, and power tools. I blew up a fair share of Barbies though.

In Jazz's case, mermaid shit was everywhere in the schools. The Little Mermaid usually makes a strong connection with girls of that age. They like the bright colors, catchy songs, and romance. This usually translates to a fascination with Disney songs later in age. But you know what other demographic loves Disney songs and princess movies? Gay men, particularly femmy gay men.
And if I recall correctly, The Little Mermaid especially struck a chord with the gay community because they could identify with a number of parts of her story: she longs to be part of a community that is cut off from her, tries to feel connected to said community through her collection in secret so her family doesn’t find out, leaving her family to pursue a forbidden romance entails losing her voice, etc.

The fact that Jennings only ever considered "she got a vagina out of the deal" to be the only important part of the story comes across as almost a deliberate misinterpretation on Jeanette’s part.
 
Second, here's a new video on the twins discussing how cucked they are.

The way these two keep stuttering over and over when talking about Jazz is honestly heartbreaking. I wonder what it's like to live in that household where the center of attention is always on Jazz and LGBT shit.
Despite the progress that's been made over the years, people STILL can't get over their son acting gay. Sometimes the dads see it as an affront to their masculinity and sometimes the moms are worried what their neighbors and friends will say. It sounds stupid but it's true. There's still a lot of prejudice when it comes to how your kids are acting in front of others.
When trooning your kid both "fixes" the issue AND gets you irrational levels of attention and pity-points, it's easy to see why people would go for that instead of just letting the poor kid be gay.
It's even more fucked up when you realize that Jazz's mom started his transition at the age of three. Meaning there's a good chance he couldn't have even been gay since this is pre-puberty. It's not impossible for a male child to act tomgirlish or even androgynous. He could've enjoyed playing barbies with his sisters and not have turned out gay; it baffles me that no one ever stopped to think that maybe he's doing it because he likes playing with his sisters.
But I guess there's no way to know now since his mom pretty such turned him into frankenstein's monster for reality television.
 
Last edited:
The way these two keep stuttering over and over when talking about Jazz is honestly heartbreaking. I wonder what it's like to live in that household where the center of attention is always on Jazz and LGBT shit.

It's even more fucked up when you realize that Jazz's mom started his transition at the age of three. Meaning there's a good chance he couldn't have even been gay since this is pre-puberty. It's not impossible for a male child to act tomgirlish or even androgynous. He could've enjoyed playing barbies with his sisters and not have turned out gay; it baffles me that no one ever stopped to think that maybe he's doing it because he likes playing with his sisters.
But I guess there's no way to know now since his mom pretty such turned him into frankenstein's monster for reality television.

Yeah, the kid I knew who acted most flamboyant at age 3, like tantrums if he couldn't wear a princess dress, used his 4th birthday money on a Barbie, loved twirling and princess movies...is now a redneck good ol' boy who likes hunting and fishing, and makes a living with small-time weed dealing and breeding hunting dogs. His girlfriend's probably glad he didn't get his balls cut off and his dick inverted.
 
The way these two keep stuttering over and over when talking about Jazz is honestly heartbreaking. I wonder what it's like to live in that household where the center of attention is always on Jazz and LGBT shit.

It's even more fucked up when you realize that Jazz's mom started his transition at the age of three. Meaning there's a good chance he couldn't have even been gay since this is pre-puberty. It's not impossible for a male child to act tomgirlish or even androgynous. He could've enjoyed playing barbies with his sisters and not have turned out gay; it baffles me that no one ever stopped to think that maybe he's doing it because he likes playing with his sisters.
But I guess there's no way to know now since his mom pretty such turned him into frankenstein's monster for reality television.
hmmm what do we call introducing something inappropriate to a toddler in a positive light, oh I'm certain there's a word...
 
And if I recall correctly, The Little Mermaid especially struck a chord with the gay community because they could identify with a number of parts of her story: she longs to be part of a community that is cut off from her, tries to feel connected to said community through her collection in secret so her family doesn’t find out, leaving her family to pursue a forbidden romance entails losing her voice, etc.

The fact that Jennings only ever considered "she got a vagina out of the deal" to be the only important part of the story comes across as almost a deliberate misinterpretation on Jeanette’s part.
In the actual story, the little mermaid kills herself after failing to make the Prince marry her. He chooses a real woman.

Maybe people aren't wrong when they say Disney gives people false expectations, heh.
 
1593821134759.png


And then no one sent Noelle any asks :(
 
Back