Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Since I don't know much about the pokermanz I had to look up if the mating bond thing was real and: nope. Jerry just invented it for the story. So it didn't even have to be a mating bond. It could have been any magical bullshit. We already have a DNA machine that spits out a half-Pokemon toddler who can speak and understand English so it's not like a magical life bond only G can perform would be any dumber.
 
I haven’t actually watched the video, but didn’t Lily criticize Steven Universe for including fusion as a plot element when it supposedly sexualizes characters who are minors? (Which it… doesn’t, fusion represents all kinds of relationships, but since when does she have the ability to analyze fiction?)

Meanwhile she has the adult pokemon raping—sorry, mate bonding—with minors.

Even if I’m nice and assume that the bond isn’t sexual, it sounds like Honeycrisp didn’t consent to the bond. And is it even possible for her to give informed consent? She’s a child and that’s a big, life altering decision.

I can’t with this.
The whole fusion=sex discourse literally boils down to two things:
- Sensual dancing in the early seasons
- The whole Garnet and Pearl arc in the second season where Pearl creates situations for an excuse to fuse with Garnet (i.e. because she wanted to feel strong instead of a literal slave). Lily calls this is a rape arc when really it's a betrayal of trust/consent arc which isn't the same thing. It's like saying the word "relationship" and thinking the person means "sexual relationship".
 
Since I don't know much about the pokermanz I had to look up if the mating bond thing was real and: nope. Jerry just invented it for the story. So it didn't even have to be a mating bond. It could have been any magical bullshit. We already have a DNA machine that spits out a half-Pokemon toddler who can speak and understand English so it's not like a magical life bond only G can perform would be any dumber.
yeah, this has been known.
Mating bond was made up for the comic.
Gardevoir being endangered was made up for the comic
The Pokemon League suddenly being law enforcement worldwide was made up for the comic
None of the actual sources of conflict in this story are based on any canon that pokemon has.
 
This is in no way to diminish what Lily has said about C!Gardevoir and her mating bond shit, but most Pokedex entries for Gardevoir mention it doing whatever it can to protect their trainer.

So it's likely Lily extrapolated her original mating bond idea from that, and then kept digging her own grave from it. What she's done is gross as hell.
 
The whole fusion=sex discourse literally boils down to two things:
- Sensual dancing in the early seasons
- The whole Garnet and Pearl arc in the second season where Pearl creates situations for an excuse to fuse with Garnet (i.e. because she wanted to feel strong instead of a literal slave). Lily calls this is a rape arc when really it's a betrayal of trust/consent arc which isn't the same thing. It's like saying the word "relationship" and thinking the person means "sexual relationship".
The Sardonyx arc shows the benefit of metaphors in storytelling (which Lily hates): the scenario playing out in the story can apply to many different situations in everyday life, and is liable to be more relatable and understandable to the person watching, especially if they're a child. Not to mention that Rebecca Sugar is on record stating that fusion is a metaphor for relationships of all kinds, not just romantic/sexual ones.
 
The Sardonyx arc shows the benefit of metaphors in storytelling (which Lily hates): the scenario playing out in the story can apply to many different situations in everyday life, and is liable to be more relatable and understandable to the person watching, especially if they're a child. Not to mention that Rebecca Sugar is on record stating that fusion is a metaphor for relationships of all kinds, not just romantic/sexual ones.
It sounds like Rebecca Sugar did with fusion what Liliana wishes she could have pulled off with the mating bond.

The name itself "mating" doesn't even make sense for what the bond actually does. On nature such a bond where two creatures share a lifespan and one mind would mean that they're better fit to raise the next generation together since that's the whole reason animals mate, so they can procreate. But this was never a point that was brought up as to why it's called like that. Liliana just decided he wanted to use a term full of sexual connotations to make her bond with her pokemon waifu all the more especial and then expects everyone else to be stupid enough to not realize the sexually charged word is sexual in nature.

Binding bond. Tying bond. Unity bond. I could think at least thirty options more accurate and appropiate than mating.
 
This is gonna be a stretch, but Josh released a new video recently reviewing the newest MLP and series launcher(he didn’t like it, mostly due to the fact that the message of the film is overly hammered in to the point of massive annoyance) and I’m just curious if Lily will end up making some passive aggressive comments about him.

Or call him a racist, because the overly hammered-in message of the film is “RACISM IS BAD!” Also the racist villain of the movie looks a LOT like his Pony OC.
EDIT: Ooh, showing plebcomics art, that’ll definitely get Lily pissy.
 
Last edited:
then expects everyone else to be stupid enough to not realize the sexually charged word is sexual in nature.
No he just likes gaslighting people. He gets off on saying "oh my god why do you perverts want my self-insert OC to fuck a Pokemon, you're WEIRD!" while he has them in a mating bond, gives them a child, has the pokemon leave hickeys on the OC's neck etc.
 
How could people think a *mating* bond could be sexual? Anyway, here's the dictionary definition of mate, according to a cursory Duck Duck Go search.

Lily is a perv who will admit it because they get off on that, but then the second anyone criticizes it, Lily acts like they've never even contemplated the concept of sex.

mating

noun

  1. The act of taking a mate, or pairing, as by birds.
  2. See the quotation.
  3. pairing of organisms for copulation.
  4. the act of pairing a male and female for reproductive purposes

adjective​

  1. Fitting into or onto a corresponding part, as a matched plug and socket.

verb​

  1. Present participle of mate.
 
OG Video as a reminder.

Lightning never strikes the same place twice. Lily, on the other hand...

Saved for posterity


TLDR: Reading comments and telling people they're wrong-headed while doubling down on her values while shiting on Lizzy and Vaush/breadtube.
Bonus:
34545.png


KP being a mush mouth talking about her canceling for an hour.
Starring Lily's creepy voice as a voice-over.
OG Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4UfLCfPfKo
 
Last edited:
OG Video as a reminder.


Saved for posterity

View attachment 2667199
TLDR: Reading comments and telling people they're wrong-headed while doubling down on her values while shiting on Lizzy and Vaush/breadtube.
Bonus:
View attachment 2667109

KP being a mush mouth talking about her canceling for an hour.
Starring Lily's creepy voice as a voice-over.
OG Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4UfLCfPfKo
View attachment 2667124

I can tell the video is going to be a work of art just by those trigger warnings.
 
Remember, you're a whiny, spoiled little bitch If you make a video talking about being cancelled, except you're someone Lily want's to get busy with
cancelculture.png
cancelculture2.png

I tried watching the first 5min of Lily's video (btw thanks for uploading it on site), and she's basically just reading comments of her previous video, which all agree with her one way or another. Also she forgot to put in background music, so it's just her reading long-ass comments in silence. Complete waste of everyone's time.
 
Remember, you're a whiny, spoiled little bitch If you make a video talking about being cancelled, except you're someone Lily want's to get busy with
View attachment 2667416View attachment 2667417
I tried watching the first 5min of Lily's video (btw thanks for uploading it on site), and she's basically just reading comments of her previous video, which all agree with her one way or another. Also she forgot to put in background music, so it's just her reading long-ass comments in silence. Complete waste of everyone's time.
This mentality is pretty common among the progressive stack. "It's not "cancel culture", it's holding people responsible for their actions!"... until it comes for you. Suddenly, the tables are turned and you're forced to go from arguing "intentions don't matter, impact does!" to "my intentions weren't to offend anybody". Some people have to learn individualism the hard way.
 
Lightning never strikes the same place twice. Lily, on the other hand...

IDK if anyone said this already, but Lily's Fallout: New Vegas example is wrong. There are SOME instances where you'll get positive reputation points with other factions if you kill Caesar's Legion soldiers, but overall you just... don't. You just get a lower Caesar's Legion reputation.
 
Back