"Jim" / James Augustine née James Patrick O'Shaughnessy / Mister Metokur / Jim81Jim / Internet Aristocrat - His autistic videos and the gay beta "sweetie squad" who mindlessly suck his cock.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Can you believe he said he liked an anime? Degenerates have made pornography of the children in it!

But in Jim's case, the manga he was talking about has pornography of children in the source material. Can't say the same about Attack on Titan.
 
Except you didn't respond to his point. He's not asking why the main characters are children, he's asking why one of them, a little girl, was shown urinating, which is a good question because it's fucking weird.

It's no wonder Japan's birthrate is so low, a significant portion of the men are fucking creeps.
Sometimes authors are weird and think certain scenes will help.
I'm less concerned with the scene itself, then with the intention behind it. My point was that the intention behind it, as I saw it, didn't come from a place of pedophilia.
For example, GRRM in Game of Thrones describes in great detail some woman taking a shit. Most people who read that, found it weird.
Does this make him a scatophile? Or is it one of those cases where the author thinks the scene will add something?
I personally believe that the intent behind an action is more important then the action itself, and it helps us be righteous when we condemn it.
 
For example, GRRM in Game of Thrones describes in great detail some woman taking a shit. Most people who read that, found it weird.
Does this make him a scatophile? Or is it one of those cases where the author thinks the scene will add something?
Probably, considering he came up with "The Loathsome Dung Eater" for Elden Ring.
Fat retarded American who is unable to cope with being compared to God-King Tolkien.
 

At 27:10 or so, Jim uses Eichenwald’s porn search to insinuate he’s a pedo.

So I don’t think Jim can reasonably say he doesn’t draw a connection between underage cartoons and pedophilia.


I miss DS1, I want to go back.
I don't think he was necessarily insinuating that, but the point remains. It's sussy and cringe when this spergy boomer does it, but when a kawaii desu vtumor does it then it's fine. Sweepy squad will never accept this premise though, they will just default to accusing you of moralfagging (what is jim doing in this video to kurt?) or something.
 
Sweepy squad will never accept this premise though, they will just default to accusing you of moralfagging (what is jim doing in this video to kurt?) or something.
It feels like if you openly criticize Jim or point out any flaw or hypocrisy in his chat, it just gets swept away in all the bullshit that people put into it, rather it be “TND” or some other shit, like once a stream started all you could see is people spelling out “nigger” or some other random garbage. And when somebody does see it, chances are that they will immediately see it as either moralfagging or a massive slight against their favorite e-daddy. It’s why I don’t interact with the chat once a stream starts because I know nothing good comes from it.
 
I don't think he was necessarily insinuating that, but the point remains. It's sussy and cringe when this spergy boomer does it, but when a kawaii desu vtumor does it then it's fine. Sweepy squad will never accept this premise though, they will just default to accusing you of moralfagging (what is jim doing in this video to kurt?) or something.
Yeah when a character that spends his time grandstanding on mainstream media is caught doing cringe internet shit it's funny to make fun of it. For example, take this scene:
It's humorous because you wouldn't expect the fat italian mobster to be dressed up as a gay cop in the gay bar. If the fat italian mobster was instead openly gay through the previous seasons of the show it wouldn't be funny, or have any tension at all. The willful ignorance of some of this is weird and sidetracks the larger point you're trying to make.
 
Yeah when a character that spends his time grandstanding on mainstream media is caught doing cringe internet shit it's funny to make fun of it. For example, take this scene:
It's humorous because you wouldn't expect the fat italian mobster to be dressed up as a gay cop in the gay bar. If the fat italian mobster was instead openly gay through the previous seasons of the show it wouldn't be funny, or have any tension at all. The willful ignorance of some of this is weird and sidetracks the larger point you're trying to make.
You're essentially saying that you expect pedophilic undertones to surround anime adjacent content creators and you're not bothered by it. This says more about you than it does about me. I personally hope for a better world that that, despite harsh reality.
 
So from his perspective it makes no sense whatsoever to even touch the issue. His fans are happy to uncritically embrace him as a fellow weeb and financially reward him for it.
I'm really confused about this essay you wrote. There's a subtle hint that there's some sort of grand lolicon movement behind Jim or am I wrong?

I didn't watch the Kirsche stream and don't think it was a good idea, but I will admit that I subscribed to Pepa because she was on the farewell stream back in the day. Then one day I was doing some stuff for a client so I got up very early (European Time) and there was a stream by her on whether or not Elon Musk was based, and I'll be honest it was alright. The childish voice didn't help, but whatever, I usually let these things run in the background. I unsubscribed afterwards.
 
But in Jim's case, the manga he was talking about has pornography of children in the source material. Can't say the same about Attack on Titan.
undoubtedly the rape isekai is worse in every metric. The moral panic is the same in my satire. The criticism is clearly more justified for the rape story that has the main character raped and then he rapes others.
You can make a closer comparison to another anime he said he liked, Goblin Slayer. There are child adventurers that get raped by filthy little goblins in it. The main plot isn't about rape or child sex, but it does happen. In your words it has "pornography of children in the source material."

We can go on and critique every degenerate anime that Jim likes (it will be almost all anime). The opinion of our closeted anime fan null is the closest to the standard you are trying to uphold. No anime is traditionalist and almost all of it is degenerate. The same can be said about Video games that Jim also likes and so do most people. The moral panic over Jim's recent decisions continues to be the most entertaining thing Jim has created in a long time.
 
Back