- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
Son (assuming your gender here), you're new here, so Imma explain how the Farms works.Okay guys, I'm a bit late to the game here, evidently. KiwiFarm has a nice platform, actually smoother than a lot of the others out there. Kudos.
I did a quick skim of the posts to date, so my apologies if I sound and look stupid. This little shit looks and sounds like he's fully used to having the system bend to his will, but the broken legal system in British Columbia has recently put back into play the Anti-SLAPP legislation which the Liberals took out, and as disclosure relating to this matter is directly in the public interest, if he tries to sue any of this crew, or even just serves them with a Cease and Desist (usually a Notice of Motion) in an attempt to scare you into submission, we are able to go after him for his attempts to SLAPP us into submission, like he likely does to his addled mother.
We can all see his M.O. but what I find really amusing is his apparent lack of legal know-how, and the stupidity of how he's gone about shaking people down. What we need to do, is mount a counter-offensive, similar to his but the really funny thing is, ours might have a bit more bite. He's totally fucked, because he's probably going to be investigated for his well-documented Criminal Offences:
- Stalking (Criminal Harassment CC264)
- Extortion (Extortion CC364)
See Canada Criminal Code here.
Those two are just off the top of my head. We need to be careful about threatening him with CRIMINAL legal actions, as that is technically a crime. We can threaten legal and lawful CIVIL legal action all fucking day. It's a caveat, where a "threat of civil legal action does not constitute a threat, for the purposes of this Act".
Civil Asset Forfeiture comes into play here, because we can threaten to take his home and his fake boobies. And strangely enough, if he is targeting children like any good sexual predator likes to do, the AG may be induced to facilitate a form of Civil Asset Forfeiture. It looks like all he has done thus far has been is to file pernicious actions in Small Claims and Social Justice Tribunals, and it looks like he paid $25 dollars to dial-an-ambulance-chaser to certify some piece of shit claim that couldn't hold water even if it was waxed.
The Cease and Desist he served this server's hosting provider was hopefully (it's that shitty) written by the snivelling little bitch himself, he just got a similarly shifty lawyer to sign it, if that. The little shit seems to think he's good enough to falsify legal documents... which might be a crime or a matter which can be resolved via a nice tight little piece of LEGAL action.
I like that Alex is more than happy to give the narcissist enough rope to hang himself, and Tucker was just the icing. He will lose, sooner than later. But after he shuts up, it might be wise to hammer him Small Claims actions, or preferable just go after him in Civil Supreme. What are your thoughts, guys?
We are not a litigation board. We are not a troll board. We do not file lolsuits; we get them and laugh at them. This board exists to chronicle information about stupid people doing stupid things (AKA "lolcows") so we, and the world at large, can laugh at them.
If anyone wants to use the evidence to put Yaniv away, great. More power to them. However- and this is important- Dear Leader and the Farms in general will not get involved. Anyone files suit against Yaniv, we'll be more than happy to document it here, but we won't get involved. If a user here decides to nail Yaniv to a cross (metaphorically), they must do so in their own capacity as a private citizen and not try to drag the Farms into it, lest they become a lolcow. Should the Canadian courts demand evidence from Null, it's up to him whether or not he hands it over; he's repeatedly stated that the only court orders he'll obey without question are those that come from American courts (since Lolcow LLC is an American company.)
Now, don't get me wrong, you look like you've done your research, which is great. But this is the wrong group of people to present it to. We only observe. We will not legally go after him. Of course, the final say is with Null. But even then, if he decides to get his revenge legally for what Yaniv did (see OP), that'd likely be his affair, not the forum's.
We play defense, and play it well. But we do not go on the offense without a very, very good reason.