What's interesting is that this video is basically a drunken, half-hour "COME SUE ME BRO" fired at an electric battery company that, by Karl's own telling, is infamous for suing anyone and anything over internet criticism. The owner of the company, one Paul T, has (allegedly) sued multiple parties in recent years, including product review websites, and yes, random Youtubers.
This is not some foreign company outside of Australian court jurisdiction, either; the company is headquartered in Australia, in Karl's own hometown (
Coomera, Queensland; I'M DYING LMFAO). According to Karl, Paul lives only a short drive away from Karl's house, running the battery company out of a shed. I'm not sure if Karl knows Paul personally (Karl seems to imply that they have never met), but this is a local boy Karl is picking a fight with.
Over the course of the video, Karl makes a number of increasingly wild claims, including:
- that Paul is an insane conman and a danger to society,
- that Paul illegally stole his company's trademarked logo, from Americans.
- that Paul criminally and fraudulently altered his company's warranty policies to avoid paying warranties on products he knew to be defective, then manipulated Archive.Org to cover up his crime.
- that Paul has committed criminal perjury by repeatedly lying in court.
- (I'm not making this up, Karl really says this) that Paul was directly responsible for the (near) death of a poor little kid.
In an eerie repeat of his "AI said I'd win the Mitchell case" Discord statements, Karl backs up the "Paul almost killed a kid" claim by asking AI to confirm it. (24:45) Which is doubly funny, as earlier in the video, Karl essentially accuses Paul of criminal negligence for using ChatGPT while responding to a customer's email. But I guess "hey ChatGPT, did this guy kill a child?" is perfectly ok...?
Kinda nuts that, immediately after losing a highprofile lawsuit because he accused a serial litigator of killing somebody, Karl would upload a video where he accuses one of his neighbours, a serial litigator, of trying to kill somebody.
What are the odds that the reason Karl took this video down wasn't because people wanted him to release a video about Billy first, but because Karl's poor lawyer took one look at the video and had a heart attack?