LGB drop the TQ - Move this thread if it's in the wrong place :o

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
popsoda

popsoda

Soda jerk
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Sep 30, 2016
The Lesbian, Gay and Bi community should abandon the Trans/Queer tail.

Being lesbian or gay is not at all the same thing as being trans or whatever.

Being homosexual or bisexual is a very well established and well understood phenomenon.
Being trans or queer is quite novel and so open to interpretation that basically anyone can fall into this term.

I'm for homosexual rights and I guess bisexuals falls in that umbrella.
But trans and queer distorts that concept.
It's not the same thing.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Slaughtercel, Blank Loop, Occluded Front and 50 others
popsoda said:
If you don't like gay people, that's the right answer - personally, I'm OK with gay people.
But trans is another topic I think.
Click to expand...
Isn't too simple.
Gay people can be very pretentious in showing that to everybody, which is absolutely disgusting.
Man, you need to come out of the closet just once. Say it, faggot.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Markass the Worst, Ewan McGregor, pleasegoaway and 5 others
I like the suggested flag, maybe it's already somewhere in the vexillology thread. It's based, powerful, makes queers whine and wail, and it in its simple idea reminds me of the revolutionary flags of Hungary and Romania (where the communist symbol was cut out, leaving a hole).
lgb no t2.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Blank Loop, stares at error messages, glitterglue and 8 others
Chao Garden said:
More like drop the whole acronym. There is no such thing as a "le heckin baste" gay, all gays are degens. If you disagree with me kill yourself
Click to expand...
The difference being, gay people don't choose who they're attracted to. If you're a gay man you like men, and that's that. If you're a gay woman, you like women.
Being trans is nothing like this.

Whether or not you agree with the gay agenda is a separate issue.
It's OK if you don't like gay people, but I think there's a difference.

I'm trying to make a thread demonstrating how the trans community uses the LGTBTWQKHBI to protect themselves from any criticism, and you're getting butthurt over the gay question.
The trans community has nestled itself into the gay community under the LGBTQ label. And I think it should stop.
Categorize gays separately. Let gays have their LGB community, and then the trans can have their TQ community, see how that works out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Blank Loop, Kiwi Yuga, glitterglue and 15 others
popsoda said:
Trans and queer has nothing to do with this, it is a question of gender identity. Which is a separate issue.
Click to expand...
Trans-women who date men are by their own definition straight women. That's why they appended that T to the acronym. So they can stay, because deep down, hons know they don't "pass". On the other hand, "stealth" trannies never show up in the first place, because there is no fight for somone like that, the state is their activist group: state sanctioned doctors make sure they look the part, state sanctioned shrinks make sure they act it and state approved paperwork makes sure you never knew they were anything but a true an honest whammens, until something breaks and they're alone, discarded. I want them to recant, when that happens, full on spanish inquisition: "yes, I'm a gay man, yes, I was retarded. Please take me back." That's why the T must be dropped. But none of this is feasible. Now, LGBTQ+ is nothing but a state psyop itself. It's mostly trannies and "lesbian" high school girls screaming for pornstars and assorted circuit queens dancing atop trucks, wrapped in corporate slogans. There's nothing grass roots left. So, I might as well piss in the ocean. And I'm not joining some retarded LGB conservitard astroturf group either. But I would really like to see that split.
"stealth" = unassuming, slight build, don't look like freaks - you've seen the type.
🎩
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Blank Loop, Suikafag, Ewan McGregor and 2 others
All alphabet people are weird people. It wasn't Ts and Qs the ones who did fetish parades in front of children in SF, for example, it was gay men. And knowing that them and NAMBLA have always been connected, it's far too late for them to try and pass this whole thing as "normal".

Also, what other things are they willing to drop to go back to the good graces of regular people? Because going with "well we tried to associate with mentally ill AGP sex pests but it didn't work out, can we all go back to normal, guys?" doesn't sound too appealing.

Now, going back on topic, yeah, it would probably benefit them, but it wouldn't make them more moral or justified
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Blank Loop, Autistic Gunspergings, Kiwi Yuga and 17 others
popsoda said:
"Stealth" trannies are just trannies who haven't left their apartment yet.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but they think they are and will sick H.R. on your ass for calling them anything but a woman.
I was trying to paint more of a generational picture. Think child/young transitioners vs. boomer hons.
The former rarely associate with anything which could endanger their larp. Which is why they never leave their apartment, I guess...
And they all claim to be straight women, except for the few true and honest "lesbians", I guess.

Trans-women who date men are gay men.
Their larping is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Not to them, hence they appended the T.
And you are correct, the movement was originally about sexual relationships of the same sexed persuasion.
Not about mutilation fetishes(T) and wearing eargauges(Q)
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Blank Loop and Ewan McGregor
I proposition we take the LGBTQIA+ acronym and just change it to 'FETISH' regardless of how much sense it makes.

It has the double-barrelled effect of making autists and degenerates seethe while also being the only honest label that links every member of this group together.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Autistic Gunspergings, 7-7-7, Audit and 8 others
While I agree that the LGB and TQ+ need to be separated, the LGB -- mainly gay men -- have a lot of their own issues that allowed the TQ+ to get parasitically attached to them. While being a homosexual male doesn't make you a bad person, lots of gay men are absolutely insufferable and destructive to their communities. Many gay men are catty, passive-aggressive bullies who thrive off creating cliques to wave in outsiders' faces, causing trouble and drama in their own cliques, demeaning women out of envy, and just generally acting like the whole world is high school. Does this not sound like a very appealing community to the average troon? There's also the trouble with bisexuals -- true bisexuality is exceedingly rare, and most self-identified "bisexuals" are just degenerate straight people who've consoomed so much porn that their sexuality has been warped, so keeping bisexuals around just opens the door for degenerate straight people and straggots who want to belong in a marginalized group.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Autistic
Reactions: Windows XP Home Edition, glitterglue, TexasRanger and 6 others
The problem with dropping T and Q is: what about the money?

There's a reason after Obergefell the rainbow coalition shifted to the new "oppressed" minority. Can't have those fundraising dollars dry up.

It's the same reason Susan G Komen supports breast cancer "awareness and advocacy" instead of just a cure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suikafag, Dr. Eldon Tyrell, GunCar Gary and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back