What are the chances Linus fires Tim the engineer because he "opened the floodgates" so to speak, ignoring how everyone else on his staff contributed to straw breaking the camel's back? It only makes leaf sense to fire the guy with skills as opposed to being some fat, bearded freak who thinks he's the wittiest writer ever.
That would be a terrible choice. Linuse defended him on Wan show, he took ownership of the comment.
Also, if there was nothing to criticise, the comment would not have opened anything.
Tbh to me it seems the "engineers" are bad at their job. Their role is not just about having knowledge, but also making sure that what they push out is accurate and communicated correctly, both internally and externally. They also often miss the point of the numbers. Does it matter if it is 50 or 52? In some cases it might, in others it won't. (Also those visualisations are bad. If one is a max and another is the average, you should not put them in different colors in the same chart; it looks like they are testing 4 coolers. Red/Green/Yellow are not "random" colors, and they shouldn't be used for normal categories. I could continue sperging on how bad the charts are, but it is far too autistic... okay, one stupid last thing: why does the x-axis go to 100? It is not a % where you may want to show the full range)

This is a pile up of mistakes which will be extremely difficult to fix. Too many employees in non-necessary roles, too few employees in key roles, a posting schedule that outpaces the release of new products and leaves them out of ideas/good content, people with know-how leaving, a multi-million project that is not giving results and instead harming the company, etc... I am now waiting for the CEO to not even start.
I am not a tech person, but I feel it would have been more cost effective to leverage their large pool of employees to push more "real life" testing. They did those in the past and people like those videos - can you actually tell if this is different/better?