I got another reason to hate lolicons now, they report any youtube comments refusing to stoop to their level and debate bro them. They'll try to use their usual style of debate; "It gives pedophiles an ethical alternative, it is just drawings on paper, how does this effect you, ect, ect." When they make those claims, they need no source, but when you make the contrary claims, they demand a source. The typical "rules for thee but not for me" bullshit. Their approach is very nonchalant and at first, they'll start out very redditesque by claiming; they don't support it, but the antis aren't making well thought out arguments, and they're only attacking "moral or emotional arguments" this is about as transparent as it gets. No neutral party just cares about who's making "moral or emotional arguments", in fact neutral people are compelled more often by emotional arguments than logical ones, lawyers will appeal to emotion all the time as well as charismatic leaders. The mask slips once you refuse to play their game. Then they report you for cyberbulling lmao.
Edit: Spelling
