Fat At The Internet
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't be a Christian right winger and openly like porn of any kind much less lolicon.
So i laugh a Little when i see the new Loli right wingers say they builded the internet right.
The type of people that were on the old Internet like Something Awful, Newgrounds, & later 4chan were not some righteous moral crusaders or Christian right wingers. They were people that were willing to shit on anyone & everything for the sake of a joke. These lolicons that cry whenever someone points the finger at them & makes them the joke were never a part of this, they were the but of many jokes without realizing it. That's literally the reason why 4chan exist, because Lowtax banned lolicon &anime shit after lolicons sperged out on him for finding it repulsive.You can't be a Christian right winger and openly like porn of any kind much less lolicon.
So i laugh a Little when i see the new Loli right wingers say they builded the internet right.
Cultural appropriation?You know, there’s a term for taking elements from another culture without proper attribution or understanding of why that thing is what it is in that culture and you just use it to look cool/look better.
I’m failing to come up with that term at the moment, probably because a bunch of retards ran it into the dirt.
You know, there’s a term for taking elements from another culture without proper attribution or understanding of why that thing is what it is in that culture and you just use it to look cool/look better.
I’m failing to come up with that term at the moment, probably because a bunch of retards ran it into the dirt.
I would say more: these people are trying to tarnish the Lord's name. While people will say you are sperging for "NAXALT", and it is understandable, I believe religion should be off limits for that sort of thing. Explaining further below:Cultural appropriation?
That Star Ocean girl is the literal Antichrist, and anybody that faps to her is fapping to humanity’s downfall.It depends on the age of the graphics card. *chuckles*
View attachment 7484058View attachment 7484059
[A] [A]
How does that hold up with saying it's the same as violence in video games?
Breaking News: Lolicons are shocked when they realize what their fellow "cunny enjoyers" will accept & normalize.Lolicon Civil War: Lines have been Crossed
Alternative subtitle - The pixels of consent
View attachment 7464917View attachment 7464919View attachment 7464935View attachment 7464941
[A] [A] [A] [A]
Chibi also getting involved with the subtlety of a shotgun.
View attachment 7464959
[A]
Especially given in anime there usually isn't much difference in appearance between a character who is 16 vs 20. If the characters age isn't mentioned or implied in the series I can't blame someone for not knowing.Canon ages matter much less than design. If the character looks childish then that's much more problematic than trivia on Wikipedia about a character being underage despite having an adult design.
These reactions prove everything I've been saying. They don’t actually care about the line they claim to draw. Saying shit like 'I won’t engage with her, but others can' or 'these guys freak me out a bit (OH JUST A BIT???)' isn’t a moral stance — it’s a way to look clean while staying complicit. If they truly believed the character was indistinguishable from a real child and that mattered, they’d condemn the sexualization outright.It depends on the age of the graphics card. *chuckles*
View attachment 7484058View attachment 7484059
[A] [A]
How does that hold up with saying it's the same as violence in video games?
It's accurate to your description. Claudia likes having Lestat and Louis be her parental figures at first because her mother died but gets massively frustrated over the years. She eventually flips her shit so hard that there's no other choice but to kill her and Louis angsts about it.So how exactly did Anne Rice approach Claudia, the OG loli vampire, in her book? I only watched the 1994 movie and I don't know how accurate it is to the book or if anything needed to be taken out/rewritten, but going off the movie alone, I thought her character was rather fascinating. Here's a young girl who was turned as she was dying (which is apparently an actual no-no in this vampire society because of her age), and as the years pass, she comes to loathe her "father" because she came to the realization she's stuck as a girl forever, that she will never get to experience being a woman despite her mental age. It actually drives her mad that she cannot age, which is partially why she developed a sadistic streak.
https://www.reddit.com/r/fictosexual/(Also what the fuck are "fictophiles"??? These niggas are so fucking delusional my god.)
When I used to browse 4chan at all there were multiple debates on what constitutes a loli, because of course there were. Among some of those threads you could observe some anons posit the philosophy that the "mentality of a loli matters" which is to say they're even lustful for the perceived behavior of children . What annoys me the most about lolikikes is how proficient their ability to doublespeak is, for they can admit to lusting after the resemblance and behavior of children and on another breath claim to "have zero similitude to actual pedophiles", in fact IT IS YOU who is the pedophile for thinking that they're reprehensible and weird. It doesn't matter how many cases of lolicons being actual pedophiles you find, they will ignore it all or hand-wave it with "muh edgy shitposting" and go back to gooning to cartoon children while saying "erm, actually there's no correlation".Don't get it twisted the age of a character is just another ploy the pedophiles like to use to prolong their existence, all they do is to add an unrealistic age to the character or say otherwise and that's enough to mud the waters and make people doubt their selves and tolerate this shit. Stick with the "if it looks like a duck" line of thought because at the end of the day pedophiles are attracted to kids, kids appearance and behavior.
Not to toot my beak over here but I said this way back in this thread and more recently on the Louis Rossman thread (if interest just look at my post history I don't post too much), but that's what pedophiles do manipulate and mud the waters, the doublespeak is one of their tools to survive and hide in plain sight. I didn't use the word lolicon in my post because lolicon and pedophiles are one and the same, the pedophiles obviously will not refer to themselves as one but lolicon, lolienjoyer, cunny enjoyer whatever fucks, will go unnoticed to most people and when confronted they come up with vague and inconclusive arguments just call you the actual pedophile in end. Pedophiles are like any other organism, it wants to survive and they do that through manipulation.When I used to browse 4chan at all there were multiple debates on what constitutes a loli, because of course there were. Among some of those threads you could observe some anons posit the philosophy that the "mentality of a loli matters" which is to say they're even lustful for the perceived behavior of children . What annoys me the most about lolikikes is how proficient their ability to doublespeak is, for they can admit to lusting after the resemblance and behavior of children and on another breath claim to "have zero similitude to actual pedophiles", in fact IT IS YOU who is the pedophile for thinking that they're reprehensible and weird. It doesn't matter how many cases of lolicons being actual pedophiles you find, they will ignore it all or hand-wave it with "muh edgy shitposting" and go back to gooning to cartoon children while saying "erm, actually there's no correlation".
The lunacy of the internet never gets old...