Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Actually read the post this time, it's only two sentences. The retard pretty blatantly called me a pedophile for not agreeing with this idea that everything that offends anybody should lead to formal censorship.

Too many posters in this thread oblige the exact same logic troons were trying to use in order to shut this site down, including the "well it technically causes real world harm" fallacy we know is bullshit. I can't figure out how they end up on this website if their first reaction to lolicons isn't to observe and laugh at them, but to instead beg the government to put them in prison.
You read it.

I'm going to give you the benefit of a doubt here even though you really don't deserve it and assume you're not a pedophile, but you are mad as fuck. Just get away from the computer and take a walk outside to clear your mind before you come back here.
 
The argument for prosecuting the AI art is that it was trained on CP, which taints the image unlike "drawn" versions which I hope to God didn't use references. So, while I agree there are slippery slopes, I think there's merit to saying that AI CP is CP, and since CP is illegal so is it's derivative.
Well, i wouldn't exclude lolicon being derivative of CP, so might aswell just get the job done and ban that too? I mean, like, lollicon is just drawn CP, the same way AI generated CP is also a derivative of CP, so if you are gonna ban AI CP than go ban lolicon aswell. There's definite merit to the ban lolicon argument beyong just "fuck animeniggers" and "gas lolis", like, as in, actually sensible argument for banning lolicon.
 
Loli and shotacons can say it is fantasy or not real all they want, but it really fucks up people's brains, especially when some of the drawings or edited videos are hyper-realistic. Even when it is not reshaded from real life CSAM or photorealistic AI. That kind of shit can Pavlov response a person into wanting to harm an actual child and is why drawn child porn needs to be illegal to make or distribute especially.
Literal exact same argument Jack Thompson and Hillary Clinton were trying to make in order to ban Grand Theft Auto, among other video games. It's so stupid.
 
Let me know how appeal to normalcy works out for you when it's time for the John Q. Public to vote on whether "gossip sites" like this place should be allowed to exist. Especially when histrionic people like Keffals or Brickface eagerly take the stand to equate Kiwifarms to actual real-world harm.
logical fallacies.jpg
 
Too many posters in this thread oblige the exact same logic troons were trying to use in order to shut this site down, including the "well it technically causes real world harm" fallacy we know is bullshit.
To be clear, are you saying that it's not harmful for somebody to be attracted to children? Because that's the harm.

We're not responsible for troons threatening to kill themselves over words. They don't even kill themselves at a higher rate.
Literal exact same argument Jack Thompson and Hillary Clinton were trying to make in order to ban Grand Theft Auto, among other video games. It's so stupid.
There's a world of difference between GTA and lolicon. Don't pretend they're in the same boat. Get a new argument.
 
Literal exact same argument Jack Thompson and Hillary Clinton were trying to make in order to ban Grand Theft Auto, among other video games. It's so stupid.
Do you have any other arguments than a failure of a lawyer going after fucking vidya? Fuck off retard.
 
To be clear, are you saying that it's not harmful for somebody to be attracted to children? Because that's the harm.

Troons threatening to kill themselves over mere words (when they don't even kill themselves at a higher rate) is not actual harm.
What's the difference? Both are harmful opinions.
 
View attachment 7093101
This is the most pathetic shit I've seen all day. Semper fi my nigga. Also Illinois AGAIN, FUCK.

Man this is so embarrassing; I honestly feel like these retards are way worse than Chris was when you compare how excessively they put personal information out there.

I really just dont understand it; furfags, gay faggots, bronies, fucking lolicons?! Why do they all have to make their sexual fetish part of their identity! I feel like even the dumbest down syndrome retard eventually learns to hide their intimate moments.

The bill passing in Texas is a net good for putting the fear of orderliness back into the chattle retards, and will hopefully stop kids from being exposed to this crap too much. Which is also another point that I feel they always lose on, if Lolicon is just innocent drawings then why are the works labeled 18+ so often?
 
This is exactly what happens. An AI trained on naked adult women and clothed legal images of children will easily be able to infer what a naked child looks like. That is one of the main ideas behind modern image generators. The only way to stop it from happening is heavy censoring of the prompt inputs and image outputs.
Yeah but lolicon is lolicon anyways so doesn't matter do me.
Also, you can't really censor a prompt. I mean, you CAN, but anyone can train their own AI model, and there are models specifically made for porn that you can run if you have a RTX 30 series, which, aren't too expensive nowadays. So most what you can do is track lolis who distribute that online. And yeah, you might say that they might have vpn's, tor, whatever, except lolicons and pedos are fucking spineless idiots so they probably don't even have the basic idea of how to properly opsec
 
Actually read the post this time, it's only two sentences. The retard pretty blatantly called me a pedophile for not agreeing with this idea that everything that offends anybody should lead to formal censorship.
Hey, @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST, nonces like this are the ones you're speaking to the defense of when you go on these tangents.
Please point to where I called you a pedophile. I'm waiting.
 
What's the difference? Both are harmful opinions.
An opinion can't be harmful. An attraction can be.

If somebody said "I get my jollies off to trannies dying" unironically, I would be concerned. If that same person said "men aren't women" there would be nothing to be worried about.
 
Nanoboosty / Nanoboosterr / nanoboosterr0 / Loliplapper / AdSelect3073 / Hayden Rank
19 year old from Crystal Lake Illinois and attends McHenry County College, This guy put stickers on his car and felt the need to flaunt it.
1741990182162.png
Putting anime stickers (especially lolicon stickers) on your car should immediately get you placed on a watchlist by your local police agency. They're the biggest red flag for any driver on the road. People who put anime stickers on their cars are either some of the worst drivers you've ever seen and/or proud child molesters.

This faggot lives with his parents, and yet they're somehow ok with their son putting sexual stickers on a car they paid thousands for?

Well, they do allow their son to have a room full of sexualized (likely AI-generated, judging by how similar the posing is) images of cartoon little girls, so maybe shame was just never a part of the equation while they were raising him.
1741990529900.png
Christ, the smell of this guy's room alone could probably be harnessed by scientists to make a new form of chemical weapon never-before-seen.
 
Now, this may seem controversial to most especially since I'm all for pedophile coping and seething, but, as far as I'm concerned, a law means very little.

Wake me back up on this when we get actual cases where the law is enforced and we get some actual litigation in action, because that's where it'll matter.
This. I have a feeling that this is one of those laws that will be in the books but will either not be enforced and was just for show, or there will be all kinds of loopholes (VPNs and whatnot).
 
Back