Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Why do they lolifags accuse non-pedophiles of being le right wing puritan moralfags whilst they worship right wing ecelebs and grifters?
It’s only bad when you’re against them and their interests. They’re very unserious people.
It's like a drug addict: If you don't bother them, you're fine. Even better if you supply them with their drugs, you're the best person in the world. Only that in terms of """right""" to have drugs and pornography, then they come as close as to say you would become like that small copypasta of "you sir are a gentleman and a scholar".

But once you mess with a drug addict's, well, addiction - they become furious - and will burn the world in order to justify it. EDIT: It's worse in the case of pornography because drugs/narcotics are properly recognised as a source of addiction; while pornography is treated as something people do just to relieve stress and people stare at you and think you are joking.
 
Last edited:
What I've surmised from the law debacle in this thread is that a lot of people don't see CP as a moral issue, which is why everyone was talking past each other about different things. That is, a lot of the free-speech people here seem to see CP from the legal perspective: it's not bad because it's made for/consumed by pedophiles, only because it is created by hurting a real child. By the same logic of "lolicon is a harmless alternative", an AI trained on a curated dataset of regular images of children and adult porn, used to produce realistic CSEM is morally fine but should probably be banned because pedos would pretend their CP was AI-generated to get out of charges, and it would legally muddy the waters otherwise.

If there was a way to prove that the CSEM was AI-generated, like a legal but controlled substance (or "ethically sourced chocolate")? Since a crime wasn't committed in making it, these people's logic dictates that it'd be "protected free speech", just like lolicon. If you frame the "it's not a real child" argument in this way, you start to understand how someone can defend it: their only issue with CP is the way it was created. Why are you attacking lolicon? No child was harmed in the making of it, moralfag! The moral (as opposed to bare minimum legal) approach to CP/pedophilia is mocked. It's the approach only a pedophile, or someone desensitized to pedophilia/brainwashed by the normalization psyop could think (which marks you as too demoralized for society, face the wall).

While it is obvious to most people that pedophiles should be behind bars at least, and CP charges are a way to identify them and accomplish that (and the main focus is that pedos need to be culled, before they hurt someone and also on principle), from a legal perspective being a "non-offending" pedo is perfectly fine.

From a social perspective, it's not, or at least didn't use to be until MAPs and lolicons began taking advantage of the state of society to normalize it and attack those who don't focus on the "real issue": the pedophiles who can and are being prosecuted by law. Obviously, the fact there are proud and open pedos haven't been shot yet is a real issue.

This is why the Texas thing pissed them off so much: the let-and-let-live, "it's fine as long as it's not illegal" view was challenged by pushing the moral "pedophiles should all die" approach into law. "A law to protect children? But no children were harmed in making it! What imaginary child are you protecting?"

Yes, the law against drawings portraying CSA is not made directly to protect children, but to punish pedophiles (and so indirectly protect children because pedophiles, and the normalized and rampant pedophilia in society is dangerous). So they cry: there is no legal precedent! This is un-uh-constitutional and stuff! Please help us we are being oppr- I mean, your free speech is being taken away! Throw them in the gas chambers, I say.

Being a pedophile is not a human freedom, and lolicon has no other value other than being material made by and for pedos. Hence, Total Lolicon Death.

I made a similar argument earlier in the thread with the completely straight guy addicted to bara, but let me make another: believing that lolicon is not pedophilia requires the same amount of doublethink and denial of common sense as believing that a woman who reads smutty Y/A novels is not straight, but in fact "fictosexual" because she's not attracted to any real men, only characters in media. Obviously the men are not realistic, they look and act like idealized versions of them meant to be sexually and romantically attractive to women. And yet, it would happen that woman is actually attracted to men.

Now, why is that? Can any of the "lolicons are not inherently pedophiles" people explain why they do not agree to such an obviously retarded self-identification without being hypocritical? It's an equivalent of the "why is transracial not valid" questions for lolicons. Give me an argument that couldn't be used against you.
 
I watched ItsAGundam for a short period, but his videos were so slow, so boring and the humour in them was dryer than my mouth after sleeping with a blocked nose that I don't get how anyone watches him. I think the double speed feature YouTube added has saved countless livelihoods
He sounds like MrMetokur but without Jim's personality or his smoker cackle
 
Crossposting from Chibi Reviews thread
And I'll copy/paste my response:

No shit lolicon is fictional. Yeah its a drawing.....But what the drawing is depicting and why you're wacking your penis off to it is the issue here.

If it was a drawing of a dead cat with it's gut cut open and you're beating your meat to it, its a fuckin problem.

Chibi, you are admitting that you like drawings of little girls. Do you have any idea how bad this sounds if you had to explain this to someone who's not terminally online???? Do you realize that lolicons usually harbor or are friends with actual sex offenders or people with CSAM???

Ya know what I'm glad he admitted it. I'm sure when he raises enough money to sue those damn niggers on x for doxxing him, the defense attorney will have a good comeback material. Better pray other states don't pick up on that Texas Section 20 law before you goto court Chibi!
 
Crossposting from Chibi Reviews thread

And I'll copy/paste my response:

No shit lolicon is fictional. Yeah its a drawing.....But what the drawing is depicting and why you're wacking your penis off to it is the issue here.

If it was a drawing of a dead cat with it's gut cut open and you're beating your meat to it, its a fuckin problem.

Chibi, you are admitting that you like drawings of little girls. Do you have any idea how bad this sounds if you had to explain this to someone who's not terminally online???? Do you realize that lolicons usually harbor or are friends with actual sex offenders or people with CSAM???

Ya know what I'm glad he admitted it. I'm sure when he raises enough money to sue those damn niggers on x for doxxing him, the defense attorney will have a good comeback material. Better pray other states don't pick up on that Texas Section 20 law before you goto court Chibi!
According to his logic, even if you goon to drawings of infants being molested you're still not a pedophile because the images aren't real.
But he is right about the fact that anime studios stand with lolicon.
 
Yes.....that being said it is ABSOLUTELY a good thing that hentai is on legal watch by the system.
Trust me that fucking bullshit is the reason why a disproportionate amount of loner males troons the fuck out.
I'm still having backlash about the time when i was driving toward work ...That day on the radio they interviewed a guy why he found trannies cool and etc, and why it should be normalised. One of his reasons was he found out trough hentai consumption.
There is a reason why a couple of us in this tread are repeating that hyper consumption of porn lead to extreme fetishes and behaviour
BAN THAT SHIT.
I stay vindicated.
1742581588218.png

congrats @LavenderMenace keep on exposing
 
According to his logic, even if you goon to drawings of infants being molested you're still not a pedophile because the images aren't real.
these people are immensely frustrating and il be honest i get mad at the internet reading the twitter screencaps. they make the dumbest most illogical retard cope arguments they can about this and they honestly expect people to believe it. anyone with an iq above 65 knows what theyre saying is bullshit but they just stand their ground because they cannot admit to being pedos. its like saying "oh no im not into animal cruelty im into drawings of animal cruelty and thats not the same so lmao". these people legit need to be castrated. then they talk about "OUR PASSION", their passion meaning gooning to drawn child porn and having a porn addiction. infuriating
 
these people are immensely frustrating and il be honest i get mad at the internet reading the twitter screencaps. they make the dumbest most illogical retard cope arguments they can about this and they honestly expect people to believe it. anyone with an iq above 65 knows what theyre saying is bullshit but they just stand their ground because they cannot admit to being pedos. its like saying "oh no im not into animal cruelty im into drawings of animal cruelty and thats not the same so lmao". these people legit need to be castrated. then they talk about "OUR PASSION", their passion meaning gooning to drawn child porn and having a porn addiction. infuriating
I understand your frustration, and it's pretty much just a bunch of assholes who revel in their "passion"; and those of us who attempt to save people from them (or save themselves from said "passions"), they get angry over. Much like substance abuse, as I keep comparing it. Because if you take away the drug - let's say alcohol from an alcoholic this time - he will deny he needs help until he actually admits he needs help.

But alas, pornography isn't treated as seriously, and worse, it's everywhere. And these people want to get others "initiated" in it; just as they were.
 
I understand your frustration, and it's pretty much just a bunch of assholes who revel in their "passion"; and those of us who attempt to save people from them (or save themselves from said "passions"), they get angry over. Much like substance abuse, as I keep comparing it. Because if you take away the drug - let's say alcohol from an alcoholic this time - he will deny he needs help until he actually admits he needs help.

But alas, pornography isn't treated as seriously, and worse, it's everywhere. And these people want to get others "initiated" in it; just as they were.
there are a lot of variables in play that lead people down this dark road. social isolation, dopamine slamming their brain by whacking off all the time, self inserting in their gay anime cartoons. then they get wrapped up in a "community" of other like minded rejects and then their social isolation gets alleviated, which leads to another false slam of dopamine which just indoctrinates them in degeneracy even more. i think most of these people know what they are and how far they have fallen but, like you said, like an alcoholic they wont admit it and obviously wont give it up because its all they have. its become their entire identity and to give it up means their entire life has to be altered. deep down they know it but they will just cope and deny their way out of it and this of course leads to the retard illogical arguments that they try to make. it truly is dark and it truly is pathetic.
 
these people are immensely frustrating and il be honest i get mad at the internet reading the twitter screencaps. they make the dumbest most illogical retard cope arguments they can about this and they honestly expect people to believe it. anyone with an iq above 65 knows what theyre saying is bullshit but they just stand their ground because they cannot admit to being pedos. its like saying "oh no im not into animal cruelty im into drawings of animal cruelty and thats not the same so lmao". these people legit need to be castrated. then they talk about "OUR PASSION", their passion meaning gooning to drawn child porn and having a porn addiction. infuriating
As others have pointed out, don't underestimate the power of an echo chamber; which many of these Lolicons are a part of. Even though the vast majority of their accounts have less than 1k followers, they've gaslit themselves and others into believing that they are the majority of anime fans out there.

The truly passionate anime fans are the ones who are against what the medium has become in the last 15 or so years, and hate seeing what they love become slop. All because the industry at large over there insists on pandering to the worst type of fan imaginable.

More often than not, an “Anti” can articulate what they love so much about the medium and showcase their favorite series, while explaining why those series resonate with them. They're fans of older and more obscure titles that often showcase what the medium is capable of. They usually hate fanservice because of how distracting and immersion-breaking it is.

Although cringy in their ways, “Antis” are the real fans. Whenever Lolicons call people “tourists”, it's 100% projection on their end because they can't watch anything that they cannot jerk off to. The Lolicon is a slave to their porn addictions and feel the need to make it everyone else’s business. They used to be contained on sites like 2Chan, and later 4Chan, because there's little consequences for posting that shit over there.

They can't talk in depth about their favorite titles without gooning; because without that element, they'll end up sounding like total shut ins with no friends.

Since I started Sporking Mushoku Tensei, my research has shown that its not even a well-written. The way that the light novels are written makes me feel as though I'm reading middle grade fiction, with adult themes shoved in. There's too much exposition and a lot of “telling not showing” when it comes to the writing. After doing some further research, I've come to the conclusion that 99% of Japanese Light Novels are derivative slop. The type of slop that panders to the Japanese version of Soyboy incels.
 
I'm not so sure about calling them real fans. Using the word Anti has become as watered down as calling someone you dislike a fascist or anything similar of the sort. It means absolutely nothing as it stands now so there's no need to go over it in that regard.

I've met some of those "antis" who have a very shallow liking for a show or game that mirrors the lolifags incapability to like something without children in it. Most of the time, it's related to the lesbian yurishit fetishists who has to make a series about something that it's not. Rather eerie in comparison to how similar they are.

Plenty of examples are in just about anything with a +90% female cast and all of their fanbases in the non-Japanese parts are downright awful due to both the turd-world lolicons and pasty white yuritroons shitting it up.

Having said that, I don't believe fanon lesbian shit to be a good enough reason to like something but as opposed to lolishota? It's more soothing in that there's no dark implication in plain sight, it's mostly a bunch of teens discovering fandom culture and making it their whole personality, with some sad fucks over 21 still engaging. But those older types were destined to be those trannies no different to the loli enthusiasts anyways.

At least, that's what I think in this little rant of mine. The TL;DR is that anime and Japanese media is gay.
 
The older I get the more i just want things to be less shit. My thoughts on anime are thusly:
I love anime. I've watched it since i was a kid. The lolicons are the biggest obstacle in any discussion about anime. Either they are going or I am going, and I am certainly not going. They invaded the fandom. They can fucking leave.
 
Back