- Joined
- Feb 14, 2025
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another wannabe intellectual is defending pedophiles again. This lispy queer is responding to every comment because people are calling out his bullshit.
Your answer likely lies in a very dry article. But I'd say when magazines with color photographs became cheap and mass producable. Think playboy, but CSAM. Distribution and production allowed the plague to spread very quickly when it wouldn't have in times past.It's just insane that at one point ANYONE could just go to a shop and go "yes that one with the naked children, by the way John how are your kids?"
But in all seriousness I do want to know how far back do these "magazines" go? Were people making and distributing CP back in the 1860s?
Thanks for archiving it for me, forgot to do that.6 mins in & he's already pulling shit out of his ass. He's implying that the number of CSAM found on the Internet in 1998 is somehow comparable to almost 2 decades later where not only most American teenagers have a computer with a camera in their pockets, so do a hell of a lot more people all across the world. & then puts it on law makers as if it's their fault for not helping the poor pedos to not rape.
Search these people's hard drives. Now.
Reminder, in many states, child sex dolls are banned for obvious reasons.Thanks for archiving it for me, forgot to do that.
He is trying to manipulate the audience with every second. Notice for "Virped" #10, he chooses that report on purpose. The pedophile talks about how their attraction is "nurturing and emotional". All while reading this statement from a pedophile who owns a child sex doll, the video's creator has an image of a child sex doll in the background. The video's creator is trying to groom you, the viewer, into accepting pedophilia. Going back to "Virped" #10, he states that the doll is "like his own child". Incest is part of the sickness as well. All of this is pure sickness, and the video's creator wants you to support the sickness with a smile on your face. Ultimately, he wants you to give him and other pedos access to your kids.
I mean if she won the defamation case I don't think its a good argument imo.Out of every thread in the world, I did not expect this one to be where I find out the current status of the PonPon girl.
I've seen them mentioned before, so figured I'd post this : niwwu has ads posted on gelbooru apparently which refers to their twitch page.
So its undeniable what audience its going for. Safe to say the "clean" argument if they ever used it, isn't going to work so good now
They featured other streamers on the home page at complete random, calling one of them a "mascot".What struck me is why twitch streamers are being advertised there.
I'm realizing this is a trend, as even on the homepage they promote nyu dachi right now. What even is this, regularly promoting loli streamers???They featured other streamers on the home page at complete random, calling one of them a "mascot".
Japan's justice system is such unbelievable dogshit that it deserves a thread all on its own, but that's neither here or there.I mean if she won the defamation case I don't think its a good argument imo.
I will never get tired of seeing philosophy fags call themselves solipsists and sophists "ironically".Another wannabe intellectual is defending pedophiles again. This lispy queer is responding to every comment because people are calling out his bullshit.
>stigmatizing pedos doesn't stop abuse.Another wannabe intellectual is defending pedophiles again. This lispy queer is responding to every comment because people are calling out his bullshit.
These fucking freaks take the de-stigmatize strategy too fucking far and it’s horrifying. The whole point of de-stigmatizing pedophilia — just enough — is to make it so non-offending pedophiles feel safe enough to get help before they hurt anyone. That’s it. It’s a harm reduction tactic, not a license to start talking about it like it’s just another “valid identity.”>stigmatizing pedos doesn't stop abuse.
>quotes pedos saying they would never do it because they fear ruining their life over the stigma
>pedos are treated inhumanely in prison
>pedos coming out of prison are less likely to re-offend
Woah dude.
I don’t think the devs are outright lolicons, but they’re definitely comfortable pandering to that crowd—and they know exactly what they’re doing. Persona’s always flirted with uncomfortable territory. Like in P3, you literally can’t reject Maiko’s marriage proposal, which already felt off. And in P4, Nanako says something similar and Dojima just shrugs it off like it’s normal. At first, I was willing to overlook it since it was pretty subtle and defendable in a vacuum. But that all shattered when I saw the Lavenza social link in Royal and the whole Ken romance route in the female P3P path. That’s when it hit me: “Oh, so that other stuff wasn’t just awkward writing—they were testing the waters.”Do you guys think that the persona devs may be lolicons i honestly at first didn't think about it because they never sexualized nanako but after thinking about it and rememberimg the Ken route In persona 3 portable and how Caroline and Justine/lavenza's designs just screams Loli Bait I'm not so sure
View attachment 7556914
tHATS A Girl? I always thought that was a boy. Either way I dont even like Persona and yet this scene gives me bad vibes.Do you guys think that the persona devs may be lolicons i honestly at first didn't think about it because they never sexualized nanako but after thinking about it and rememberimg the Ken route In persona 3 portable and how Caroline and Justine/lavenza's designs just screams Loli Bait I'm not so sure
View attachment 7556914
No, it's a boy...a boy who you can date as a 17 girl or some shit...tHATS A Girl? I always thought that was a boy. Either way I dont even like Persona and yet this scene gives me bad vibes.