Matthew Geddes / @LeftistFoxButt / Hemms Fox / Attica Fox - Raging communist furry, handed out a communist furry manifesto at a furry con, multiple Twitter bans

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Matthew loves to post a guillotine image places:
upload_2018-1-3_1-3-4.png


You know how /pol/ likes to joke about how #RefugeesWelcome should apply to Israel too? Matthew isn't joking, he's serious.
upload_2018-1-3_1-4-25.png


https://archive.fo/0Qu0o
upload_2018-1-3_1-5-55.png


Interesting mention of 2 people with threads here:
https://archive.fo/POqKK
upload_2018-1-3_1-7-44.png



Matthew hates someone else named Null, and someone wants them to die.
https://archive.fo/cKYZ0
upload_2018-1-3_1-11-6.png

upload_2018-1-3_1-11-22.png

Matthew sperging about Skyrim:
https://archive.fo/ukX4Z
upload_2018-1-3_1-19-0.png





A random RT that's somewhat funny considering secondhand rumors about how Matthew hates his job (there were some other nuclear hot takes on there but this stood out IMO):
upload_2018-1-3_1-1-27.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Golden Compass
I'm curious what Matthew would think of Trans 8 year olds (probably one of the more touchy topics involving kids being used for agendas nowadays):
View attachment 353066
https://archive.fo/Z3N8U

Election salt:
View attachment 353068
https://archive.fo/EJBzX

While being against cop violence and "Nazi" violence, Matthew is all for taking out those pigs in the government.
View attachment 353070
https://archive.fo/Lgxfn

I wanna see Matt and thecybersmith duke it out.
 
I'm curious what Matthew would think of Trans 8 year olds (probably one of the more touchy topics involving kids being used for agendas nowadays):
View attachment 353066
https://archive.fo/Z3N8U

lmao they got 13 y/os
chowchowchild.png


and then attica exposes them to hardcore porn on their public twitter of men in fursuits stroking their black dog dildos in an act of masturbation in "strategically placed hole" fursuits for sex in the furry fandom. Now thats what i call sexually deviant. - http://archive.is/miUKs

chowdong.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Meowthkip
and then attica exposes them to hardcore porn on their public twitter
Not that rare, actually. Twitter is awful about keeping porn in hidden spaces which means people with thousands of followers are forced to manually vet every person following them.

Even worse, when joining Twitter it suggests accounts for you to follow. Things like 'Baby Animals' and 'EarthPorn' that are accounts who seem to operate via submission, and so are frequently spammed with hardcore pornography and shady advertising yet have hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions of followers.
2018-01-10 03-08-06-Baby Animals (@BabyAnimalsPic) _ Twitter.png
2018-01-10 03-08-33-Baby Animals (@BabyAnimalsPic) _ Twitter.png
2018-01-10 03-08-51-Baby Animals (@BabyAnimalsPic) _ Twitter.png

They really need to fix that hellsite. Throw under 18s into a different server or some shit. Or just burn the entire thing down.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Meowthkip
Not that rare, actually. Twitter is awful about keeping porn in hidden spaces which means people with thousands of followers are forced to manually vet every person following them.

This isn't twitter's fault at all. Noone put a gun to attica's head and told them to type "Pssstt....You're so fucking beautiful" and click "reply" directly to pornography on main. There is no hidden space/obfuscation that defeats dumbfuckery, which is why we are here to document it.

They really need to fix that hellsite. Throw under 18s into a different server or some shit. Or just burn the entire thing down.
Agreed w/r/t burn down twitter.
 
There is no hidden space/obfuscation that defeats dumbfuckery, which is why we are here to document it.
This part is agreeable.

This isn't twitter's fault at all.
Incorrect.

Twitter allows those underage to use it while at the same time not making it very difficult to disable the 'do not display sensitive images' option. Couple that with their 'suggested accounts' algorithm(which I mentioned in the previous post) not being curated in any way plus the platform being so open to abuse by bots of all kinds, and it becomes clear they have little interest in actually doing anything to stop questionable material being readily available to people of all ages with a single click. Requiring users to have a mobile phone number to activate accounts is not a strong enough barrier to entry when most kids and teens have a cellphone available.

Now, of course one can find porn anywhere on the internet, so Twitter also having porn is not surprising in the least. You cannot reasonably suggest that they manually vet every person who might happen to follow them. That is not feasible and flies in the face of reality.

If Twitter had better tools or more strict rule enforcement? Perhaps it could be done, but as it stands users are not required to state their age and expecting someone to comb through thousands of followers at all hours of the day before deciding to interact with anything that could be considered Adults Only is absurd. Twitter couldn't even fix the problem by outright banning pornography on the site because that would require them to disable all image/video uploads and links to outside content to avoid people continuing to upload porn.

When it comes down to it, Matthew happening to comment on porn or like it when they also have someone underage following them is par for the course rather than something unique to this particular dickhead. It is the symptom of a much larger issue. This is precisely why people create AD accounts and warn about possible NSFW content in their profiles.

Twitter has no other option for dealing with it.
 
Now, of course one can find porn anywhere on the internet, so Twitter also having porn is not surprising in the least. You cannot reasonably suggest that they manually vet every person who might happen to follow them. That is not feasible and flies in the face of reality.

If Twitter had better tools or more strict rule enforcement? Perhaps it could be done, but as it stands users are not required to state their age and expecting someone to comb through thousands of followers at all hours of the day before deciding to interact with anything that could be considered Adults Only is absurd. Twitter couldn't even fix the problem by outright banning pornography on the site because that would require them to disable all image/video uploads and links to outside content to avoid people continuing to upload porn.

When it comes down to it, Matthew happening to comment on porn or like it when they also have someone underage following them is par for the course rather than something unique to this particular dickhead. It is the symptom of a much larger issue. This is precisely why people create AD accounts and warn about possible NSFW content in their profiles.

Twitter has no other option for dealing with it.

Yes, you can vet thousands of people with the lack of official twitter support. It's called a private twitter #afterdark and furfags on twitter understand they maintain it themselves and vet the people they mutual with so they don't blight the rest of humanity with silicone dog dildos. Some of these accounts are mutuals with 1000 other furries and thats the risk or exhibition they are willing to take in their private sphere of influence. This is why you shouldn't be horny on main distributing hardcore pornography to 13 y/os because main twitter is a public space. Anyone can see it! Your employer, your brother, your mom, your grandparents, your best friend. If you walk out to a public space irl like the bus stop and start wacking off on the bench and "its not my fault there is a 13 y/o!!!!!" isnt an excuse when you get hit with a sex offense compared to jerking off in your bedroom with the door locked in your house. That's why companies make "the news" when the intern running their social media does something stupid like "liking" or retweeting conventional missionary between adults. Similar to the recent spat of school teachers losing their jobs for calls to violence against a group of people or threats against individuals. You are responsible for your actions and if you can't handle not being exceptional on twitter then you are the exact type of person that shouldn't have a soapbox and a microphone in the first place.

Even leftist understands ADs, private, and "requests to follow" ie vetting and they eat their own shit. It's not hard:
leftistAD.png

http://archive.is/ooB3w
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Meowthkip
You are responsible for your actions and if you can't handle not being exceptional on twitter then you are the exact type of person that shouldn't have a soapbox and a microphone in the first place.

Even leftist understands ADs, private, and "requests to follow" ie vetting and they eat their own shit. It's not hard:
View attachment 353294
http://archive.is/ooB3w
The issue with your entire argument boils down to this line here. There is zero way to avoid those people when browsing Twitter. They have specifically tailored it to shove whatever the people you follow like or reply to under your nose.

Should all NSFW content be hidden behind a private account? Fuck yes. Will that ever conceivably happen? Fuck no. Matthew, the fox-tailed shit-gibbon, even states it in your attached image. "Will you follow my AD/private if I made it?"

No. And as far as we know, it was never made.

Because it is not against the rules to put porn on a public account. Is it idiotic? Yes. But again, Twitter does not give a shit and therein lies the problem. Until you can begin forcing these jerkoffs to stay under their rock they will never willingly go at risk of losing followers. Some of them even get a kick out of it.

Fuckwits like Sargon can spam porn at people and get banned because they were moderately famous and thus under scrutiny. Small-time furry spergs like Attica are not going to rank high enough to warrant it unless major changes are made. Call him out on it if you want, outrage is always funny, but I feel assuming the problem can be fixed without input from Twitter is :optimistic::optimistic::optimistic: as fuck.
 
The issue with your entire argument boils down to this line here. There is zero way to avoid those people when browsing Twitter. They have specifically tailored it to shove whatever the people you follow like or reply to under your nose.

So you don't advocate taking personal responsibility for your actions and the cause and effects thereafter? Your hysteria reads like Melaine Daniels in The Birds getting pecked to death, but in this case its 2D bluebirds and you are getting tweeted @ to death by 13 y/os wanting your cock and Matthew/attica/leftistfoxbutt shouldn't be held accountable. This isnt a problem people have that aren't exceptional individuals.

Should all NSFW content be hidden behind a private account? Fuck yes. Will that ever conceivably happen? Fuck no. Matthew, the fox-tailed shit-gibbon, even states it in your attached image. "Will you follow my AD/private if I made it?"

No. And as far as we know, it was never made.
Yeah and if they had made the account instead and drooled over murrsuiters on their AD I would of never seen it (how blessed would that be) and screencapped it nor would the impressionable 13 y/o communist furry (lmao) that follows them and replies to their porn exposure have seen it and felt the need to make a meme format .jpg reply "arrested for horny on main"

Because it is not against the rules to put porn on a public account. Is it idiotic? Yes. But again, Twitter does not give a shit and therein lies the problem. Until you can begin forcing these jerkoffs to stay under their rock they will never willingly go at risk of losing followers. Some of them even get a kick out of it.
You can still report it and block and if you find people who get a kick out of it you can screencap them and post them on kiwifarms.

Fuckwits like Sargon can spam porn at people and get banned because they were moderately famous and thus under scrutiny. Small-time furry spergs like Attica are not going to rank high enough to warrant it unless major changes are made. Call him out on it if you want, outrage is always funny, but I feel assuming the problem can be fixed without input from Twitter is :optimistic::optimistic::optimistic: as fuck.
I think its the reverse ie donald trump (big time) can get away with more than british national front (small time) who got deleted. I think you are deliberately avoiding the direct issue that attica is horny on main. Aware they could of made an #AD to avoid this. Chose not to. Replies to explicit fursuit porn. I hold them responsible with a screencap. Idc what twitter "problem fixes" b/c if they get banned for example commie/nazi alike then thats one less person to gawk at for being exceptional.
 
Literally what the fuck are you two babbling bout...

We're here to make fun of a sperg, not to argue semantics of porn on social media.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Golden Compass
Literally what the fuck are you two babbling bout...

We're here to make fun of a sperg, not to argue semantics of porn on social media.
At this point I'd have to agree. The argument (while technically about Matthew and the current behavior of the fandom as a whole) has gone on long enough.
 
While being against cop violence and "Nazi" violence, Matthew is all for taking out those pigs in the government.
View attachment 353070
https://archive.fo/Lgxfn
Extremists of all stripe are always so quick to forget history. I don't think the French cared much for that period of time. Maybe that's why they call it the reign of terror? Robespierre was a piece of shit and his actions brought about an actual dictator in Bonaparte.
 
Extremists of all stripe are always so quick to forget history. I don't think the French cared much for that period of time. Maybe that's why they call it the reign of terror? Robespierre was a piece of shit and his actions brought about an actual dictator in Bonaparte.
When they taught me that in school they said tons of people were executed for little/no reason, and that it was a extremely shitty time in history.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
When they taught me that in school they said tons of people were executed for little/no reason, and that it was a extremely shitty time in history.

In Matt's mind, they were all rich, even the servants, and they deserved it solely because of that reason.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
Back