Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[Desktop User2]

That's the thing we can say it's regular

Holy shit, dude, we cant say that. I would give 3/4 of a fuck about this if it was not the first excuse the Balldo camp used to discredit the test. It´s an illustrative claim based on average consumption, you cant say if the use is regular or a single dose. It´s molecule mass/hair mass, it´s not a segmented hair test. They dont analize various lengths of the hair to determine the historicity of the consumption.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Holy shit, dude, we cant say that. I would give 3/4 of a fuck about this if it was not the first excuse the Balldo camp used to discredit the test. It´s an illustrative claim based on average consumption, you cant say if the use is regular or a single dose.

So someone can still test positive with that current concentration without it constituting an overdose ?

 

[Desktop User2]

So someone can still test positive with that current concentration without it constituting an overdose ?

She could´ve ODed for all that we know, they could´ve estabilized her at home, she could be dosed every night for epic anal rape, I dont know, what we can say it is not an impossible amount to consume in one dose.

 

[Fapcop]

That's the thing we can say it's regular but we can't say if its low end, if its high end, how many dosages even. Only thing we can say for certainty is that it's multiple because the kid is still alive. Because it goes through the same process but with different speed and quantity and 10 times is too extreme of an amount for it to be concentrated there over a singular dosage.

If children metabolize cocaine much slower than adults, which could be possible, it’s entirely likely that one dose in a kid looks like regular use with an adult.

The “ten times” is a little bit misleading because it’s ten times the cut off rate. The cut off rate isn’t some kind of standard adult dosage, but basically means: “Anything below this doesn’t count, because chemistry is complicated and we’re talking about ridiculously small amounts.” I believe it’s 500pg per ml, which is 500 MILLIONTHS of a gram.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

So someone can still test positive with that current concentration without it constituting an overdose ?

By "someone" we are talking about 9 y/o girl. It seems to me that studies that rely on statistics about metabolization of cocaine vs. hair growth rates among casual and regular users of cocaine might be lacking in the 9 y/o girl sample size department. The tables exist for adults. I haven't seen anything that says those dosing conclusions can be extrapolated to children. I think the best they can do is state the child consumed cocaine in some manner.

It's rekieta's fever dream to get people to argue that the test means OD or "regular user" or "Faulty Test." Then he rules out OD and "regular user." In reality, I think it's just a result consistent with a child exposed to cocaine. It doesn't have to be an OD or regular user and there is no reason to explain why because we don't have enough tests of 9 y/o girls. It's a positive test that the child was exposed at least once during the time it took to grow the hair. How much and how long can't be determined from one test on a single 9 y/o girl.