Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

As it stands either it was faked by someone that has worked in local government long enough to know all the procedures yet also autistic enough to know the ins and outs of Nick's entire life and also found the names of other people in the county or its real. the problem is either way its a massive crime.

, the timezone is correctly set to CDT. 2:38:40 PM local. (or 7 pm, depending on how the copier records time). Dated today.

so they could have easily leaked this in response to Nick's announced stream.

Kayle personally knows the person from human services

its a small town and happened 15 years ago, I bet they don't even remember each other. She could have just been browsing any photo uploaded with a #spicer tag on the site that day, or the photo is for some bullshit event she went to.

There's no shot that just some random can go up to these terminals and with pull this up

why would a random person do it though? I bet up until literally this very case it was never a concern that someone might pull something like this or that they'd upload it online for millions to see instead of maybe showing it to friends and family involved in a case.

Guess what?

i'm an idiot. explain why it would matter that its raining? wouldn't all these records be accessed in a court house meaning no reason to go outside nor have either their hands or the paper wet?

 

[JCDenthog]

It looks like the case is supposed to be available to the public at public access terminals. @JCDenthog the documents should still be up Thursday if you want to verify them.
View attachment 6101983

https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/MCRO/Handout-MCRO-Accessible-Case-Types-and-Documents.pdf

Then it's settled, I'll post my findings which will just be a Thursdays news paper along with the cover of the document on the terminal. I'll go through and verify the more salacious details like the child testing positive for cocaine and report back to the thread.

 

[Seafarer]

I'm not gonna trust that crackhead snackcuck to be our source of authority to track if this document is real or not. That sounds fucking unhinged

I will say that it would be a weird thing for Aaron to lie about if the kids really did get taken into foster care

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

I'm not gonna trust that crackhead snackcuck to be our source of authority to track if this document is real or not. That sounds fucking unhinged

To be fair, he has substantiated some of his claims so far.

Hypothetically, I think it'd be worth a prod and see what he says.

But yes, don't take it as gospel.

 

[Captain Manning]

If he didn't fake it (this includes having a balldo washer legal friend or Dax's goons fake it) then the only reasonable assumption is that it's legit and he leaked it (or had it leaked by proxy), which means when it's inevitably found out that he did, his defense attorney is going to drop him by Monday and he'll probably get found out before the omnibus hearing.

Why do you think Nick leaking it is the only reasonable assumption? Have you been paying attention to the thread?

@AltisticRight just explained how this likely got out.

 

[porkWellington]

Dick's gonna be pissed. He has a real shot at Lolcow of the Year and could surpass Nick but not if this is true.

 

[Not Who You Think]

Brings this to mind, after the famous hot tub stream on January 29th with the Imholtes at the end of January, with whom they were swinging and doing cocaine, etc.

Non-specific health emergency was the reason for the cancellation, but he didn't specify who had the emergency:



Later, when his fans got restless, Nick said that there was a medical issue in his family that lasted 3 days:



Once he returned to streaming on February 1st, he claimed what happened was nobody's business, but everything "is fine everything's okay, I just had to spend the entire night last night making sure that someone was okay, so, sometimes that happens when you're a dad, and that's how it goes but everybody's good nothing was actually any problem."

If this document isn't a fake, then it may speak to what happened... and how long it may have been happening for.

 

[MaltVinegarRespecter]

i'm an idiot. explain why it would matter that its raining? wouldn't all these records be accessed in a court house meaning no reason to go outside nor have either their hands or the paper wet?

Well, when you leave the courthouse you have to walk outside...where its raining, to get back to your car. And, if he is just some rando who went up there to see what the could find, he may not have brought a folder and it would get wet.

 

[AltisticRight]

i'm an idiot. explain why it would matter that its raining? wouldn't all these records be accessed in a court house meaning no reason to go outside nor have either their hands or the paper wet?

Maybe you should read the post again.

Also they won't be in shit. People don't even get punished for leaking sensitive government information to gay war forums half of the time. They're not going to punish someone who printed a publicly available court document out of a terminal, took photos of it, and then posted them online.

 

[Beavis]

“At my nine year old’s worst they tested positive for a little coke”

- Doug Tenapel

 

[Mikoyan]

a medical issue in his family

To be fair a 9 year old on a 3 day coke bender is a medical issue.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Whoever leaked this committed a crime

As someone who (granted it was over 20 years ago) made a living by accessing court records from a public terminal and printing them out, let me tell you, its 100% plausible to me that this person did exactly as they said they did. Went in and got something they shouldn't have had access to. Because clerks fuck up, all the time. Its just a thing that happens. Seems to be happening more now that things are more digital. Check the wrong box or pick the wrong pull down option and something that was supposed to be sealed is open to the whole world until it gets discovered unsecured.

It looks like the case is supposed to be available to the public at public access terminals. @JCDenthog the documents should still be up Thursday if you want to verify them.

Spoiler: Personal opinion

Whether or not the documents are considered by the court to be available to the public, I'm not so sure it was morally right for somebody to share to all and sundry to be honest.

These kids did nothing wrong.

I think based on reading the info documents on Minnesota government websites that it appears POSSIBLE that this might be actually viewable at a public terminal as the leaker claims.

I am not sure whether it is permitted to print out or share the document however.

I'm guessing court staff would be the ones who would know for sure with respect to both questions,

With respect to that:

It's a complete coin toss if it'll be available for viewing Thursday morning but I'll give it a college try and post what I found in this thread Thursday morning unless it's resolved earlier.

If you (or anyone else) choose to go, I would strongly encourage you to first verify with staff before using the terminal to ensure there is no ambiguity with what documents you are allowed by court rules to view and/or print.

What I concluded from reading documents:

It DEFINITELY won't be available online, on MCRO, but it can be viewed at a terminal. This refers to the case itself. Documents within the case may be confidential. @Yandex Captcha Solver just posted this too

https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/MCRO/Handout-MCRO-Accessible-Case-Types-and-Documents.pdf



This is a FAQ for CHIP public access dated to October 2016. It states that material in CHIP cases are publicly viewable at terminals EXCEPT "confidential information and confidential documents".

It also states that an enumeration of confidential information and confidential documents is available in a form called CON115

https://mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/scao_library/CHIPS/CHIPS-FAQ-(October-2016-Update).pdf







This is CON115 in its entirety. Confidential documents are listed on the left.


https://mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/CourtForms/CON115.pdf?ext=.pdf

Note that in the footnote it specifies that "although medical records, chemical dependency records, psychological records, and psychiatric records are inaccessible to the public under Rule 8.04, subd. 2(f), summaries of or quotes from those records may be included in petitions, reports to the court, orders, and other documents that are accessible to the public.", meaning the fact that medical records were cited by the court should not have bearing on it being

If the document was something that "the court in exceptional circumstances had deemed inaccessible to the public", that would count as confidential.

However in any event it appears that there would need to be a cover sheet filed and available to the public which would at least confirm the date on the filing.

 

[6thRanger]

There's really only one explanation for why Nick singled out his "favorite" to give drugs to. Cocaine is expensive, I don't think this happened accidentally at all since she must have been doing it regularly to reach such a high level and if Nick shares his expensive cocaine with someone 2-3 times a week then there's probably a really fucking awful reason for it. No doubt they gave her whiskey also. Maybe there's a reason she is the only one who has night terrors and acts out violently.

Please be wrong Lidl.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Responses to the news in Nick's hug box:

Spoiler: LOCALS response

 

[Joggin Noggin]

wouldn't all these records be accessed in a court house meaning no reason to go outside nor have either their hands or the paper wet?

Potentially. But given how consistent the marks are, it seems more likely to me that they all got wet a bit when held together and got rained on. The marks are so consistent that it is almost certainly on the paper itself and not a copying artifact

 

[Seafarer]

Brings this to mind, after the famous hot tub stream on January 29th with the Imholtes at the end of January, with whom they were swinging and doing cocaine, etc.

Non-specific health emergency was the reason for the cancellation, but he didn't specify who had the emergency:

View attachment 6101961

Later, when his fans got restless, Nick said that there was a medical issue in his family that lasted 3 days:

View attachment 6101962

Once he returned to streaming on February 1st, he claimed what happened was nobody's business, but everything "is fine everything's okay, I just had to spend the entire night last night making sure that someone was okay, so, sometimes that happens when you're a dad, and that's how it goes but everybody's good nothing was actually any problem."

View attachment 6102011

If this document isn't a fake, then it may speak to what happened... and how long it may have been happening for.

If the incident in question was his kid getting into the cocaine, how did the kid test positive 3 months later?

 

[TexOffender]

This stallyn19 guy just posted a clip. Aaron looks genuinely surprised.

He verified one of the names of the CHIPS workers.

Edit:
@elb also posted the clip. Sorry girl, his clip hit my feed first lol.

 

[NoOneIsLooking]

Well if this is indeed true, they won’t be seeing their kids anytime soon. And that child endangerment charge might have actual teeth

 

[Chode]

It looks like the case is supposed to be available to the public at public access terminals. @JCDenthog the documents should still be up Thursday if you want to verify them.
View attachment 6101983

https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/MCRO/Handout-MCRO-Accessible-Case-Types-and-Documents.pdf

Rule:

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/ra/id/8/

From case doc:

 

[Return of the Freaker]

But would you trust him to cook you Spagettios?

I'd rather be a cop and trust Denny's to get my order right