Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not Who You Think said:
Brings this to mind, after the famous hot tub stream on January 29th with the Imholtes at the end of January, with whom they were swinging and doing cocaine, etc.

Non-specific health emergency was the reason for the cancellation, but he didn't specify who had the emergency:

View attachment 6101961

Later, when his fans got restless, Nick said that there was a medical issue in his family that lasted 3 days:

View attachment 6101962

Once he returned to streaming on February 1st, he claimed what happened was nobody's business, but everything "is fine everything's okay, I just had to spend the entire night last night making sure that someone was okay, so, sometimes that happens when you're a dad, and that's how it goes but everybody's good nothing was actually any problem."

View attachment 6102011

If this document isn't a fake, then it may speak to what happened... and how long it may have been happening for.
Click to expand...
Drunkenly stuffing stimulants up their noses doesn't count as feeding your kids, fuckboy.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Hellion, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Male Idiot and 5 others
jellyrat said:
I was on the fence about this being real, but the suddenly cancelled stream has me thinking it is...

EDIT: This was 100% on my Twitter feed but was pulled before I could archive it, fuck me.

View attachment 6102052
Click to expand...
If the documemt was fake it'd be really easy to say DAS NAWT TRUUU without having to speak much.
God, I'm truly mad at the internet tonight
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Hellion, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Return of the Freaker and 4 others
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Hellion, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Male Idiot and 7 others
Balldo's Gate said:
Whether or not the documents are considered by the court to be available to the public, I'm not so sure it was morally right for somebody to share to all and sundry to be honest.

These kids did nothing wrong.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's just morally wrong.
But then, the leaker couldn't even print documents properly, redacting the names was likely beyond their ability.

Spycrab said:
@Null could you put the 60% chance of the document being real below 'OP' in bold, giant font for us good-hearted normies?
Click to expand...
90% now.

boom.jpg
>5000pg/mg, picogram per milligram
500 is the cutoff number.

boom2.jpg
Wrong.

Edit: more in-depth explanation
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Essay2414778, often puzzled and 15 others
Seafarer said:
If the incident in question was his kid getting into the cocaine, how did the kid test positive 3 months later?
Click to expand...
I personally don’t know much of cocaine detection from hair follicles. As it is not as common to use it in a clinical setting where I live.

But I would advice reading some material specific to children. As the metabolization of drugs and hair growth varies a lot in children when compared to adults.

My superficial knowledge is that a positive test has a good sensibility and specificity to confirm the previous use of the drug on a child. But the timing and dosage may not be correlated to the levels found on hair follicles in children as is in adults… So it’s difficult to define a window of time and possible dosage exposure.

EDIT:
I made an autistic analysis here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-18635067
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Thé au lait, lego racers and 7 others
macrodegenerate said:
If it were an IT consultant who lifted it off a server, the document would be clean with no cursor. They would probably leave in the metadata too because it wouldn't be traceable back to them.
Click to expand...
Thats not true. Often PDFs are scanned into the system from paper and shitty machines.
Its extremely often that the servers don't have the "clean" original typed digital version because court people are dumb and don't know how to upload shit so they use the scanner to upload and send it into their systems.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Vetinari, Male Idiot and 10 others
6thRanger said:
It really doesn't. Still, I refuse to believe the other members of their polycule would give enough room for it to get that far.
Click to expand...
As it currently stands there's no evidence to back up any of the particularly horrifying speculation; just a lot of disturbing pieces of an obscured puzzle. Until there's some real confirmation of his actions I'm going to do my best to not think about the worst case scenario while being weary of the future to come.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Thé au lait, Kars den Karb and 7 others
Balldo's Gate said:
Whether or not the documents are considered by the court to be available to the public, I'm not so sure it was morally right for somebody to share to all and sundry to be honest.

These kids did nothing wrong.
Click to expand...
Did you even read the document? The 9 year old broke into the master bedroom and rather than do laundry, did cocaine. That doesn't sound wrong to you?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: Hellion, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, koos koets and 8 others
The Ricoh IM C2500 is an office printer that supports NFC scanning seemingly without requiring credentials. So in theory you could grab scans of these without leaving a login trail.

It's possible the printer keeps a log of what devices have been paired to the printer and what docs have been scanned into that device, but it isn't like older Xerox and Samsung business printers where you have to punch in a username and password (at least that's how it's been for jobs I've worked) to keep track of who is printing what and when.

This leaker could also have a cheap burner phone they installed the app onto just for this (also highly unlikely) but it puts doubts upon my doubts that someone would take such a huge risk leaking this document. I still don't buy it as 100% authentic. If they used their personal phone in a moment of opportunity they can be found out pretty easily unless they want to ditch it and get a brand new phone, even then the timing is now established.

Screenshot_20240618-204456~2.pngScreenshot_20240618-204514~2.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, knux, make_it_so and 23 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back