Prediction:
6G is going to have a stupidly short range, be terribly unreliable, but be "good enough" to replace 4G. Then they are going to reuse 4G bands but make slight changes to the protocol that 4G uses. These changes will inceease speed and carrier capacity by at most 10% but it will also use more power, have a shorter range, and be incompatible with most older devices. This will also be called 6G, and it will regain enough of 4G's lost functionality to keep most people happy.
This description is 4G -> 5G. The 6G rollout will probably be better for pre-6G devices, which will only be 5G devices exclusively. 4G is basically gone anyway, at least if you go far enough outside town where all the 4G towers were, litterally, torn down because their (((owners))) are too cheap to rent poles from AT&T and the past five Presidents deregulated utility poles.
6G's problems are all the Smart Devices Stuff which it is explicitly designed to do. Instead of connecting your smart devices (doorbell, glucose monitor, ankle bracelet, credit card, car) to the network through apps (ring, dexcom, scram, klarna, tesla) the 6G network chip will do it automatically. Which means it cannot be shut off. 6G is explicitly made for implants, off the top of my head Tractive (for animals), Nx2me (dialysis) and MyCareLink (aka Medtronic pacemakers) which will send life-saving medical information directly to Drs or anyone else without any ability to shut them off besides tinfoil hats.
This is where it won't always work, and people will probably die. Much like most car crashes (see Nader v. GM), Google's monopoly, Facebook allowing children to upload photos, and most AI any harm will be labelled as Necessary For Progress. The technology won't be fully fleshed out until 7G in the 2040s. By then, your car will have a 6G chip, 6G IMEI, and mandatory registration to an (((ISP))) for registration to the DMV. Any criticism of this will be closed.
Relating back to the thread's actual topic: The "National Design Studio" 's ("" because it's their current operating name, this WILL be changed to obfuscate facts later) exists to make all pre-DOGE, pre-Trump online .gov information archaic and broken by design. If your smartphone can't even read old pre-NDS websites most people won't. There is also the explicit psychological trick to condition people to accept all NDS-compliant sites as Truth and reject all non-NDS compliant .gov sites. This happens with old people who are used to a simple, pre-Trump (and 10 years ago, pre-Obama) web interface just to have it completely changed into some sort of flashy tik-tok twitter queer lookin' signboard. If old people can be tricked then they're not too far off from adapting this and tricking many more people too. This is where AI can be used to introduce fake videos, fake announcements, and literal actual fake ideas. See Trump's recent "alien visit" Truth Social post. ((((People)))) (if we can call these creatures human) like Gebbia want the entire government reduced to this. Something (((they))) can completely control.
Personally, I am of the opinion that official .gov websites should look and appear professional, and assume the user is literate enough to read at a 9th grade level. NDS-compliant sites, as far as I can tell, don't assume literacy past 3rd grade. It is visual slop and it is turning the entire government into a literal TV show, with each government basically being differently themed Departments under a single Government Media Brand. Trump is not the first to do this, and he's not the first to force me to look at blacks, but he is the first to assume the User is Viewing Content and not Reading. I do wonder about the WWE and McMahon angles in all this, which is more research for another day.