- Joined
- Mar 25, 2015
Manosphere Mystery Man - SlutHate dumbass who couldn't leave well enough alone
- Thread starter Frank Rizzo
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2015
The whole point of lookism is this:
Casual sex and hooking up are everything,they are the meaning of life.
The more girls you bang and the hotter they are (by lookism standards of course) the more successful you are.
People who are able to achieve the above are "Slayers".
People who don't are "incels".
It's black and white.Either you are a slayer or a incel.
Everything else is "coping".
Looks is the key to getting abundant casual sex and being a slayer so lookism is all about "looksmaxing" and getting "aesthetics" also know as trying to become as good looking as possible.
Although Money (M) and Status (S) are also recognized as important these are generally looked down upon and ignored with the whole focus on looks for various reasons.
Basically:
Casual sex with hot girls is everything
Great looks = abundant casual sex with hot girls
So the goal of your life should be to become as good looking as possible
That is extremely anti masculinity.
It's also highly supportive of feminism,hypergamy,and hook up culture which is the supposed arch nemesis of incels.
Basically lookism incels support,encourage,and reinforce all the things they supposedly despise and hate.
They also worship "Chads" even though Chads are also supposedly great enemies of incels.
A "Chad" is a really good looking guy who is presumably a "Slayer" and having lots of casual sex with women.
Some users are even advocating for and using makeup.
I'm sorry Mystery Man but you are a perfect example of this behavior in this thread and also everything that is wrong with Lookism.
Could you imagine a guy like James Bond (in the older movies not the new ones) and Clint Eastwood putting on make up to "raise their looks by 2-3 points" and getting plastic surgery so that they could go out to a club and pull some skank for a hook up?
James Bond:
Clint eastwood:
Vs
And
I know those are both only movies but the point is "masculinity" is evolving and not in a good way.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
Jesus on a unicycle, are we meant to read all that?The whole point of lookism is this:
Casual sex and hooking up are everything,they are the meaning of life.
The more girls you bang and the hotter they are (by lookism standards of course) the more successful you are.
People who are able to achieve the above are "Slayers".
People who don't are "incels".
It's black and white.Either you are a slayer or a incel.
Everything else is "coping".
Looks is the key to getting abundant casual sex and being a slayer so lookism is all about "looksmaxing" and getting "aesthetics" also know as trying to become as good looking as possible.
Although Money (M) and Status (S) are also recognized as important these are generally looked down upon and ignored with the whole focus on looks for various reasons.
Basically:
Casual sex with hot girls is everything
Great looks = abundant casual sex with hot girls
So the goal of your life should be to become as good looking as possible
That is extremely anti masculinity.
It's also highly supportive of feminism,hypergamy,and hook up culture which is the supposed arch nemesis of incels.
Basically lookism incels support,encourage,and reinforce all the things they supposedly despise and hate.
They also worship "Chads" even though Chads are also supposedly great enemies of incels.
A "Chad" is a really good looking guy who is presumably a "Slayer" and having lots of casual sex with women.
Some users are even advocating for and using makeup.
I'm sorry Mystery Man but you are a perfect example of this behavior in this thread and also everything that is wrong with Lookism.
Could you imagine a guy like James Bond (in the older movies not the new ones) and Clint Eastwood putting on make up to "raise their looks by 2-3 points" and getting plastic surgery so that they could go out to a club and pull some skank for a hook up?
James Bond:
Clint eastwood:
Vs
And
I know those are both only movies but the point is "masculinity" is evolving and not in a good way.
Bottom line us.
While you're at it, give us your thoughts on the discussion currently taking place about closing the Loveshy forum all together and booting you preachy spergs back where you came from.
MysteryMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
The whole point of lookism is this:
Casual sex and hooking up are everything,they are the meaning of life.
The more girls you bang and the hotter they are (by lookism standards of course) the more successful you are.
People who are able to achieve the above are "Slayers".
People who don't are "incels".
It's black and white.Either you are a slayer or a incel.
Everything else is "coping".
Looks is the key to getting abundant casual sex and being a slayer so lookism is all about "looksmaxing" and getting "aesthetics" also know as trying to become as good looking as possible.
Although Money (M) and Status (S) are also recognized as important these are generally looked down upon and ignored with the whole focus on looks for various reasons.
Basically:
Casual sex with hot girls is everything
Great looks = abundant casual sex with hot girls
So the goal of your life should be to become as good looking as possible
That is extremely anti masculinity.
It's also highly supportive of feminism,hypergamy,and hook up culture which is the supposed arch nemesis of incels.
Basically lookism incels support,encourage,and reinforce all the things they supposedly despise and hate.
They also worship "Chads" even though Chads are also supposedly great enemies of incels.
A "Chad" is a really good looking guy who is presumably a "Slayer" and having lots of casual sex with women.
Some users are even advocating for and using makeup.
I'm sorry Mystery Man but you are a perfect example of this behavior in this thread and also everything that is wrong with Lookism.
Could you imagine a guy like James Bond (in the older movies not the new ones) and Clint Eastwood putting on make up to "raise their looks by 2-3 points" and getting plastic surgery so that they could go out to a club and pull some skank for a hook up?
James Bond:
Clint eastwood:
Vs
And
I think the men of Geordie Shore and of course Magic Mike are more attractive to women now than James Bond or The Man With No Name. James Bond did as well as he did because the script said so. He walks into a bar just looking cool and the hottest women in the world come over to him. Same with The Man With No Name, he barely even spoke just stood there. Honestly I challenge anyone to try that tactic in a club of just standing there sipping a martini at the bar trying to look cool and see how many women come and hit on you. I'm betting zero. Especially not the hottest women there.
Masculinity is a lot softer now, and more feminine, in terms of the vanity most men show. Many guys are obsessed with their appearance now, just like I am... This is pretty much a modern day thing. The guys from Geordie Shore are probably high-T despite this.
Hook-up culture is fantastic, thank god for women who get around.
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2015
My opinion on the matter is pretty irrelevant because I'm not a kiwi,I don't have the same agenda as you,and this is your forum not mine.
Quite literally that is something for kiwi's to decide.
And that's about as simple as I can make it.
True to your nature the only thing you took from what I said was how it related to casual sex and succeeding at it.
I really don't care to debate wheter Magic Mike is more attractive than James Bond.My post had nothing to do with that.
You do realize that being obsessed with your appearance is traditionally a feminine value right?
Do you say that as someone with years of personal experience and success with it or just as someone who idealizes it and seeks to achieve it?
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
"I'm not a kiwi,I don't have the same agenda as you,and this is your forum not mine"
Then why are you still writing your autism-posts about feminism/manhood/casual sex/lookism v sluthate that are miniature essays on here?
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
I mean, credit to Slayer where it's due, they're surprisingly sane posts. Not that I agree with his arguments, but he's being pretty reasonable.
It's unnerving.
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Sheer boredom. When this subforum was actually interesting the Lookists and SHers would actually demand we do things for them on this forum despite claiming it wasn't theirs. I believe the term I always used was "our playground, our rules."
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2015
Slayer is actually right imo (excuse me while I go set up an appointment for chemo). Masculinity is more than just looks, but it also requires things like charisma, personality, and presence. People like James Bond and Clint Eastwood (and their respective actors) are so memorable not because they're good-looking, but because they're striking. They command the audience with a word and they enrapture people by the way they act. Looks are important to some degree, but if you're shallow as fuck it doesn't really matter either way. Being able to carry yourself can make even the ugliest motherfuckers into lovable guys.
Also, while it's generally the main impetus of the Kiwis to disregard most cows as they're speaking nonsense, Slayer is actually making some coherent point and it really makes people look silly when they tl;dr it like many cows do to long posts that we make to them. It's very likely that he would've gotten a shit ton of Winner ratings if that came from a Kiwi and not from Slayer. Don't dismiss shit just because of the guy who immediately said it, because it makes you as bad as the people on Lookism that rave about how all black people are inherently less attractive or some shit.
Also, while it's generally the main impetus of the Kiwis to disregard most cows as they're speaking nonsense, Slayer is actually making some coherent point and it really makes people look silly when they tl;dr it like many cows do to long posts that we make to them. It's very likely that he would've gotten a shit ton of Winner ratings if that came from a Kiwi and not from Slayer. Don't dismiss shit just because of the guy who immediately said it, because it makes you as bad as the people on Lookism that rave about how all black people are inherently less attractive or some shit.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
I agree, but am troubled at the implication that you've ever had a relevant opinion.
MysteryMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
Yes well that is my mindset and that plays into how I read into your posts.
I don't have success hooking up with the hottest women only average women. I think I've only had the opportunity to sleep with two or three hot women since I left high school. The first I remember we spoke briefly and she told me to come find her after I went to get a drink and where she would be etc and for some reason I never went back to continue talking to her. The other time a girl was about to go home with my friend and that girl's friend was going to go with me but I stayed out waiting for a girl I had been texting who ended up not sleeping with me and wasn't even hot so I don't even understand why I did that. Finally there was one at a party but she was drunk (we both were) so I don't think it counts, she probably felt disgusted about being in my presence the next day.
I tend to feel nervous around legitimately hot women, especially if they are popular. I remember recently I was out and I was standing talking to my friends and two girls who were sitting on a couch-thing made eye contact with me and giggled and they were cute, honestly, and I kinda smiled back for a half second then looked back to my friends and did everything possible to avoid looking in their direction again. I was even mildly tipsy but it still affects me. Every time a girl I find attractive has shown interest in me or tried to talk to me I freeze up.
Apart from that I have just hooked up with not-so-attractive women or average women or women with cute faces but weird bodies.
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
MysteryMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
One in particular I'm thinking of had sort of a square body. I don't know the best word to describe it but it was just kinda blocky and her breasts were small by comparison. She was the female equivalent of a short stocky man basically.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
MysteryMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
Looooool, yeah I guess that's a better way to say it.
José Mourinho
The Special One
Forum Staff
Retired Staff
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Status