Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
AnOminous said:
It's extremely common for settlement-related documents to be restricted or even sealed, since they can't be used as evidence in an actual trial.
Click to expand...
So does this mean that whatever the settlement is, whether in Rick's favour or not, there's a chance it'll be sealed and we'll never get to know if Man Of Pig made bank or not?
( ◠‿◠ ) said:
You can complain that the police DO show up to your house and you can complain that the police DON'T show up to your house, but you can't fucking complain about both.
Click to expand...
While anything that causes Pat misery is funny, this isn't a logical statement. The MPD's handling of Pat was absolutely preposterous; as despicable as he is I think he was absolutely right to sue them for not taking the fucking hint after the 20th or 30th time that these calls were fraudulent.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dr. Jaime Reyes, Pobblebonk, ConSluttant and 15 others
AirdropShitposts said:
This will allow Patirck to laser in on solving the actual problem by making sure Donald J. Trump and the rest of the atalkers enjoy prison.
Click to expand...
He will build a fence around the White House but due to incompetence he'll build it backwards so they can easily just get out.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Dr. Jaime Reyes, Dean Pentel, Windy Moors and 17 others
AirdropShitposts said:
This will allow Patirck to laser in on solving the actual problem by making sure Donald J. Trump and the rest of the atalkers enjoy prison.
Click to expand...
you joke but if he gets a fat check then I expect litigious pat will return. remember you dont need a winning case to waste everyone else's time and money. you also dont need a winning case for an idiot judge to agree and waste even more time and money.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Dean Pentel, Laburnum and 7 others
OhmygodOHMYGOD YOU GOTTA BE FUCKING KIDDING ME
1739025496980.png

PIGGY IS REXEETING TARIQ NASNEED
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Crocodylus Acutus, Pobblebonk, Drama Fan and 30 others
AnOminous said:
Tbh if you look at a lot of free speech cases and other rights cases that have done society a lot of good, LOTS of them involve complete pieces of shit.

To quote one of America's greatest literary geniuses:

"The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all." --H.L. Mencken

This is actually what's so pernicious about the insane SJW concept of "no bad tactics only bad targets." Bitch, if you ratify horrible tactics, you're GOING TO BE THE TARGETS OF THEM, probably some time sooner than you think.
Click to expand...
Hard disagree.

The police did a handful of, essentially, welfare checks. It was only due to the belligerence of the obese homosexual suffering from gynocomastia that one or two of those incidents involved him being in any way - and totally reasonably - restrained.

As has been pointed out many times before, the mere fact that someone claims they're being "SWATted" in and of itself means jack fucking shit; I hope that, if successful, this lawsuit leads to many situations where people commit heinous crimes while claiming to be a victim of "SWATTing" only for these same police to find themselves defending themselves against worse lawsuits because they didn't do the minimum of their jobs and actually check to see whether or not the alleged crime was actually being committed - as they did in all of these cases which did not involve a single instance of anything that could possibly be construed as a civil rights violation.

You are right more often than not, and you're probably right about how this matter will ultimately be resolved, but the assertion that the police in any way handled these events "wrong" is entirely off-base.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pobblebonk, Dean Pentel, REGENDarySumanai and 17 others
Uncle Buck said:
As has been pointed out many times before, the mere fact that someone claims they're being "SWATted" in and of itself means jack fucking shit;
Click to expand...
especially when said person counts any visit of the emergency services to anywhere on his street as a "SWATTTing", regardless of whether or not he's actually involved
(IIRC the most ludicrous one was where he photographed the fire service putting out a blaze halfway down the street and called it a SWATTTTing)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pobblebonk, ConSluttant, Dean Pentel and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back