Racemixing Debate - Do you support it? Are you again it?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
These 'pure breed' types are usually the genetically inferior ones, and f they insist on only fucking their own then they end up with some kind of genetic abnormality that wrecks their lineage.

the whole: superior aryan ideal: hardly any of the inner circle nazi party members actually made the grade, did they? apart from herman goring, all the nazi party peeps looked like hungarian jews and queer junkies. bad eyesight, no blondes among them, midgets, mental cases, sickos, etc: hardly a good advert for a 'superior race'.

most royal families throughout history have ended up having to fuck 'middle class brood mares' because they in-bred their way into haemophllia type blood diseases by just marrying other royal types, and let's not forget about the pure breed jews who end up with very specific cancers and blood disorders, or the cousin marrying pakistanis and their retarded children because they're all so insistent that they keep their blood 'pure', or keep it in the family, or whatever weird way they describe being a bit backward.

science shows us the way: clever eugenics, aka selective breeding, creates robust and healthy plants and animals. why do humans think they're so different?
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
  • Agree
Reactions: why42, WhiteBoySummer, ITK and 10 others
My honest take: miscegenation between africans or aboriginals and Europeans or East Asians should be avoided at all cost (don't know what to do with Indians tbh). Looking at history and current performance and traits on what is desirable in a civilisation, it's clear that Africans are not going to make it, and they should stay away from interacting with Europeans and East Asians. History books in the future will say that Africans (and the the mutt arabs) are pretty much generational (biological) weapons to destroy societies (assuming this will be documented).

TL;DR
If humans want to evolve (in a constructive way), a good start would be to just not include nigger genes. They have to be removed.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: mmore789, 820㎌Cap, NinthAngle and 1 other person
ENDTOPII said:
My honest take: miscegenation between africans or aboriginals and Europeans or East Asians should be avoided at all cost (don't know what to do with Indians tbh). Looking at history and current performance and traits on what is desirable in a civilisation, it's clear that Africans are not going to make it, and they should stay away from interacting with Europeans and East Asians. History books in the future will say that Africans (and the the mutt arabs) are pretty much generational (biological) weapons to destroy societies (assuming this will be documented).

TL;DR
If humans want to evolve (in a constructive way), a good start would be to just not include nigger genes. They have to be removed.
Click to expand...
Indians are themselves miscegenated. They're varying mixes of Caucasoid and Australoid that depends on caste (especially historic caste because castes got screwy over the centuries thanks to invasions by Muslims and the Bri'ish) and location within India (south Indians are darker overall).
 
uhm yeah i did a study that shows that latina pussy actually isn't race-mixing and that actually, it's good

peterson.png
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: why42, WhiteBoySummer, ITK and 7 others
If you're leading your victorious band of warriors to conquer continents and not miscegenating, your soldiers are probably buttfucking each other, and that's gross.

Save the Loli said:
Indians are themselves miscegenated.
Click to expand...

Conquering armies fucked back and forth across the Eurasian landmass. Genetic distance maps of Eurasia look like giant smears, depending on which genes you're looking at.

1702875365228.png

This one's supposed to be the Ottomans, I guess?

1702875790925.png

Anyway, don't marry a black person, that's retarded.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: mmore789, NinthAngle, IAmNotAlpharius and 2 others
I don't know how this is even worth debating. We're predominantly drawn to our own kind, and that's how it should be. The inferior ones are those who seek to make mixed kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmore789 and NinthAngle
If you wanted to build something out of legos, it wouldn’t make sense to say “I will only use 3 X 2 blue blocks.”

A lot of complicated shit goes into genetics and it would be short sighted, to say the least, for white people to assume their genes are already the best and then try to exclude themselves into some pocket, thereby dampening their participation in evolution.

That said, a lot of pairings end up making messed up looking kids, like when you have an African base of features with blonde kinky hair and blue eyes.. it’s uncomfortable.

So one of my things is straight hair. Kinky hair just raises some kind of alarm bell
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: mmore789, NinthAngle and SIMIΔN
dvnc said:
I don't know how this is even worth debating. We're predominantly drawn to our own kind, and that's how it should be. The inferior ones are those who seek to make mixed kids.
Click to expand...
Yes, but if you say that, people like Mothra1988 gets very upset and defensive and randomly attack you on other threads for it.
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: mmore789, IAmNotAlpharius, The Foxtrot and 3 others
Sparkling Yuzu said:
Because race realists claim some races have a lower IQ, I don't believe that. I believe in human biodiversity.
Click to expand...
Intelligence has physiological factors, like the shape and spacing of neurons, and the density of neurons in the brain, etc.

Some of that is definitely heritable.

Even more so, we don’t really learn things with purely abstract incentives. If your neurochemistry gives you an addictive dopamine hit for learning something, you’re going to learn more things.

That said, the difference in innate capacity for intelligence is most often overshadowed by the fact that none of us reaches our full potential. Five or ten points on an IQ test isn’t going to make you smarter than someone more disciplined than you.

At a standard deviation or two, the world is going to be a different place, though. The smarter person’s brain is doing it all on autopilot, and effort isn’t enough to close the gap anymore.

But with these types of distributions, it’s all about likelihood, nothing determinate. Every race has outliers that are way smarter or way dumber than average, it’s just a matter of how often it happens
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Some Badger, DDR Yoga, Sparkling Yuzu and 1 other person
Getwhatyou said:
When you look at dogs. Mongrels tend to live longer over purebred
Click to expand...
Hybrid vigor only applies to heavily inbred groups. The various Europeans ethnicities are not heavily inbred such that it is unnecessary to breed outside of one's ethnicity let alone the white race. In fact, miscegenation may produce the less often talked about "outbreeding depression" wherein the unique combinations of alleles from distant populations can lead to the expression of maladaptive traits. This bears out in the data with poorer psychological and biological outcomes for mixed race individuals. Anecdotally, one also observes problems of identity for such individuals where they feel like an outcast from their respective racial origins. Taken all together, it's not advisable but I wouldn't go so far as to say it's something erroneous in every circumstance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jhonny Jhon, NinthAngle and Sparkling Yuzu
Sparkling Yuzu said:
Because race realists claim some races have a lower IQ, I don't believe that. I believe in human biodiversity.
Click to expand...
Why? The greatest source of allelic diversity between the races comprise genes relating to the brain. It would seem highly unlikely that such differences are irrelevant and that these different groups would arrive at the same average IQ by happenstance.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: mmore789, NinthAngle and Sparkling Yuzu
dvnc said:
I don't know how this is even worth debating. We're predominantly drawn to our own kind, and that's how it should be. The inferior ones are those who seek to make mixed kids.
Click to expand...
I can see the logic to what you're saying, but for myself I didn't seek out a non-white woman to get into a relationship with. It just kind of happened, and we got to know each other and things clicked.
 
  • TMI
  • Like
Reactions: SpergioLeonne and Sparkling Yuzu
Jarch6 said:
In fact, miscegenation may produce the less often talked about "outbreeding depression" wherein the unique combinations of alleles from distant populations can lead to the expression of maladaptive traits. This bears out in the data with poorer psychological and biological outcomes for mixed race individuals.
Click to expand...
It's like the chihuahua pitbull mix that was disabled by having a big pitbull head and small chihuahua body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jarch6
The Gene Genie said:
I can see the logic to what you're saying, but for myself I didn't seek out a non-white woman to get into a relationship with. It just kind of happened, and we got to know each other and things clicked.
Click to expand...
White male/Latina is the number one combination.

Just no Afro-Latinas, please.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back