Off-Topic Random Trans Thoughts, Musings, and Questions - For all your armchair psych and general sperging

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Man its a pity Reimer didn't send that sick fuck to Hell first when he decided to check out. That asshole Money has a lot to answer for, the worst peacetime medical crime since the Tuskegee Syphillis Atrocity is a direct result of Moneys work.
And don't forget gorges burou. It's always the french. 🤣
Tho, no idea who could've sent him to hell. And money was def. the ideological powerhouse.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
The AGP diaperfurs and "age play" pedophiles I don't know what the fuck they are. They certainly aren't heterosexual by definition, I guess apart from "transbians" which are, if you strip all the bullshit, dudes that sexually harrass lesbians.
I think most people are straight, gay, or bisexual. However, I think people like this and the type of people who fuck cars are their own category of paraphiliacs. They're people who's sexuality is based on some really bad wiring in their head, whether at birth or triggered after too much porn, to jerk it only to specific conditions. Like the men who steal shoes and only jerk it to the shoes. Maybe they only choose women's shoes, but their desire is still the shoes. The diaper fetishist can get off as long as there is a diaper or ABDL even if he has a sexuality choice.

I think the classification should go straight, gay, either, people who have no sex drive (asexual but not oppressed, might need medical help might not want it), and paraphiliacs. The last should continue to be seen as a problem, particularly if they force outside participants. You can fuck your own car you buy, but you can't fuck your neighbor's car or rentals.
 
I think the classification should go straight, gay, either, people who have no sex drive (asexual but not oppressed, might need medical help might not want it), and paraphiliacs.
Yeah I'd agree, I think thats about the most accurate classification system I've seen, and its certainly a workable one, way better than what people use now.
 
👋Dragging another round over...
Telling the likes of David Reimer, "oops, your dick got mangled, you're a freaky third thing now" is not much better than what actually happened to him.
That's not what I'm talking about.
And there's nothing else to tell him besides: "shit son, you dick got maimed." How exactly do you expect parents to tip toe around that? It's just traumatic.
You, quite frankly, seem like the exact kind of person, who would've fallen for money's sweet little lies:
"Oh, he won't even know he was damaged because he will just look like a normal girl!"
"Aww, thanks doc, what a great idea. I really didn't feel he could work his social sex change without a penis."
You have to tell people they're weird and they have to let others know, in moments where that's pertinent without feeling shame around that.
Third sex would be need to that end for people other than reimer, who actually suffer from these au naturel conditions.
Every kid with a DSD is one sex or the other.
That's the only nitpick where I disagree, just because we can test kayotype, I don't actually think it has any meaning for these purposes. A Boy with a friggin vagina can as well say he's a woman, I don't care. And that's what happened before kayotype testing was even possible. Laypeople just judge what they see
But this is where friggin trannies come in and poison the well to erode all good will, of course.
 
GcL0kqjXwAAWbop.jpg
 
Please go the fuck outside. I'm not a fan of trannies either but the trans talking points are intentionally stigmatized to drive engagement with the public. Capitalistic journalism and reporting are fucking cancer. Trannies do not have that much power in aggregate, there are just isolated examples where they flex their man-muscle online. Otherwise they're practically like four leaf clovers, except you're usually unlucky to find a tranny.
In actuality, this is basically a form of baseline testing. I wouldn't even call it compliance. I agree with what you said but the problem is that they do actually turn kids into eunuchs. This is so severely transgressive, it's basically a shit test to see if people will just talk about it or, big compliance bonus, even volunteer their kids. The problem is, tho the numbers of transitioners are limited, cue waiting lists, it is larger than ever before and real people, like us, are roped in by what is very likely, mostly bot driven engagement. But it exists and was always morally wrong.

If you step back and strip away the fact that some people want this done to them and that it's openly talked about, it's more of a Tuskegee Syphilis thing. But then again, it's really not. The psyop, which you think makes the outrage disproportionate, is a hall mark feature of the thing itself. We are basically seeing, in live action, what must've gone done with the aztecs and offering your first born.
Some people are just so much Untermensch, they live for it

It is really interesting that you had killdeathmurdersprees at abortion-clinics but NONE at gender ones thus far.
Well, at least it's no yet pertinent to report on them. But I guess the upcoming pool of detransioners or fathers who lost custody might provide enough monarch candidates for that.

What the state can take away from this, is basically: If I extend this practice too far into the middle class, people get afraid for their kids, they will eventually figure out an ideal tranny threshold but as of now, for some reason, they wanted to blow the lid of on purpose, which is crazy, seeing the decade long buildup for this particular psyop. They had to basically wait on a whole generation of subjects to be poonerized to make people care enough. On that note, my actual conspiracy theory: this is very much like other unhinged plastic surgery with giant butts and tits. All of it will be eventually be stamped out or reigned in by regulation, so when >>they<< want to insert that RFID tag and brain interface, the public is more desensitized to invasive procedures.

As always, it's probably not even a single conspiracy to begin with but just multiple currents converging.
 
Last edited:
I hope that every tranny fear happens to them in current U.S. political sphere. Nothing would be more satisfying than watching them killing themselves in mass. We’ll literally lose nothing of value. They’re going to kill themselves anyway, so why not just give them extra encouragement. If I’m going to be stuck hearing about their devastation over the election, I want results. Sadly fuck all going to happen, because they’ll convince kids to off themselves before they even consider the idea for themselves
 
It used to be widely taught and accepted that someone using threats of suicide to control or coerce others was being abusive. It was in checklists about abuse warning signs and so forth. I remember my grandma watching some lady talk show about it in like 1985, these women confiding they had been coerced into marriage and such by men threatening suicide, and the host lady educating the audience of benzo-dependent housewives that this was not acceptable.

Trannies however have normalized using suicidal threats and gestures as a bargaining chip, completely.

I'm just wondering if that extends across the board to all circumstances, or if someone who said "marry me or I'll jump" would still be recognized as a lunatic abuser.
 
This has probably been said in many different ways ITT so far but just in case there's some worthwhile nuance in this: anyone else notice how a lot of trans activists do agree on the premise that sex and (the concept of) gender are different things, but then also say that gender somehow overrides sex without explicitly stating it? For example, using male and female as terms for sex, but also using female to describe a transwoman.

Often they'll use the HRT rewires the body's metabolic function argument and then state that because of this they have successfully changed their sex. The issue with this however, is of course exclusion. What about those poor transwomen who don't want/can't have HRT? Well they're female too because "trans women are women!" and that's just so funny to me because they'd rather undermine what little plausability they may have had than throw the genderspecials under the bus.
 
Is there a place where I can get RAW data about the troon problem? I'm trying to avoid my studies so I've decided to see if I can make a statistical model which could potentially plot what types of people are "most likely" to troon out.
Download all the pre-HRT pictures off Reddit and stuff them into a neural network. The beauty of modern day statistical models is you don't need to understand why they flag something, it just does, and with great accuracy.
 
1731498915686.png

Why do people hate us?
Did we do something? The hate has gotten so bad that part of me is convinced it's my fault. I know it's not, but I can't shake that feeling. Why do people hate us? Why do people feel the need to put us down?
Link
Archive

Ask the echo chamber, I'm sure you'll get a truthful and worthwhile answer.

This is one of the replies:
1731499037255.png

I've seen a "cis envy theory" - that people chafe against gender roles but feel they have to follow them, so LGBT people living freely makes them jealous.

:story::story::story:

Oh, yes. Yes. It's us who are chained to gender roles, not the people who feel compelled to change their gender because they want to have a haircut. Not the people who think a hobby is a mark of gender, and if you collect enough of these it means your gender does not fit your "sex assigned at birth" and now you have to cut your tits off or take estrogen to grow ones. Not the people who are obsessed about questions like "how to walk like a boy", "how to laugh like a girl" or "can I wear a tights if I am a non-binary transmasc" and hold beliefs like "I am a trans man because I like to top" and "I am submissive and anxious, so obviously I'm a girl". Not the people who believe kids who like things that are typically liked by the other sex are "trans". Nah, it's us who are bound by gender roles.

Us, who know that no matter what we do, how we act and what we wear, we are still the sex we are and nothing could change that. We are the one who are bound by gender roles. Fucking hilarious.

They really believe in it, though, are they? They think we are prisoners of our own gender roles, stereotypes, expectations, etc. and we are jealous of them who dare go beyond that.

It's so fucking insane, it's hard to warp your head around it sometimes, isn't it. The people who live and breath gender roles, norms, expectations, etc. every moment of their lives, who change their entire self to fit them, think that they are the ones who are free from them. We, who don't think of it nearly as often and know we are who we are regardless of any gender role, norms, expectations, etc. we choose to follow or not to follow - if we even think about that, so many things these gender-obssessed people think are of a certain gender (sex) are basically neutral for most of us - they think we are the ones who are bound by them. Clown world.
 
They really believe in it, though, are they? They think we are prisoners of our own gender roles, stereotypes, expectations, etc. and we are jealous of them who dare go beyond that.
They have to believe it. It's like believing someone who isn't of your religion would surely be happier and better for it if they were converted. It's a strain of thought a lot of hardcore lefties these days have in some regard, that everyone is secretly unhappy living how they live and forced into it and that's why they go so hard about enjoying it. That there is always layers to strip off of someone, if you find the right button to push, they'll awake the new, better version of themselves that thinks like you do.
 
This has probably been said in many different ways ITT so far but just in case there's some worthwhile nuance in this: anyone else notice how a lot of trans activists do agree on the premise that sex and (the concept of) gender are different things, but then also say that gender somehow overrides sex without explicitly stating it? For example, using male and female as terms for sex, but also using female to describe a transwoman.

Often they'll use the HRT rewires the body's metabolic function argument and then state that because of this they have successfully changed their sex. The issue with this however, is of course exclusion. What about those poor transwomen who don't want/can't have HRT? Well they're female too because "trans women are women!" and that's just so funny to me because they'd rather undermine what little plausability they may have had than throw the genderspecials under the bus.
That's the bait and switch, they start out with "sex and gender are two different things" but then immediately conflate them whenever they can. This reddit post sums it up:
stupidpol5.png
They do the same thing with "trans" being some sort of health condition. It starts out with "we need gender affirming care or else we will literally die" but it becomes "everyone is whatever they say they are and no one is allowed to contradict them, not even doctors, also if you think I should be seeking medical treatment just because I say I am trans then you are a gatekeeping truscum and also probably a Nazi."
 
This has probably been said in many different ways ITT so far but just in case there's some worthwhile nuance in this: anyone else notice how a lot of trans activists do agree on the premise that sex and (the concept of) gender are different things, but then also say that gender somehow overrides sex without explicitly stating it? For example, using male and female as terms for sex, but also using female to describe a transwoman.

Often they'll use the HRT rewires the body's metabolic function argument and then state that because of this they have successfully changed their sex. The issue with this however, is of course exclusion. What about those poor transwomen who don't want/can't have HRT? Well they're female too because "trans women are women!" and that's just so funny to me because they'd rather undermine what little plausability they may have had than throw the genderspecials under the bus.
Yes and I'd imagine it peaked a lot of people who hold that view, it was certainly a factor for me.

The "existence" of non-binary genders undermines the claims of the truscum and brings the whole thing crashing down: under the same trans umbrella as Olivia who was meant to be born a stunning woman but was unfortunate enough to suffer a medical complication in the form of a fully functional penis and testicles, you will find Aidxyn the nullified chaotic enby who is escaping the white supremacist gender binary. The only thing these claims have in common is the truth that everyone who has ever made either of them is male or female and has never actually changed their sex.

It extends to intersectionality as a whole because the implication is that my giraffegender that I just invented and posted a flag of on Tumblr is as meaningful and carries as much weight in the oppression stakes as being black, Muslim, Kurdish or having a birth defect which means you've never been able to walk. Sex seems to be the only vector which becomes totally irrelevant (always funny seeing transfems aggressively complaining about how much more oppressed they are than transmascs) while gender is the only one you don't have to show any evidence of (BIID aside, but that's still not as widely accepted as gender even though you actually can actually change how many limbs you have.)
 
Back