Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Dynastia said:
Mona's not the only one pissy about it.
Click to expand...

Okay, I will give Mona respect for this. Chimpouts or not, she appears to have an actual sense of principle and at least tries to remain consistent to it. Perhaps not perfectly, but nobody does.

I remain disappointed with David Gerard, and suspect him of being that very mod. I used to consider him a person of principle.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire, lolwut, Pesce and 2 others
Mona butts heads with Cuckstain at the Saloon bar: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...y_for_deleting_things_from_their_talk_page.3F

Yup I have always understand that shit posting, trolling etc can be deleted from a user talk page. As that editor has been stalking Mona in a borderline creepy manner, I don't blame her for deleting.--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, this was thrashed thru here in the Saloon a month or so ago. The community still allows users to deem that trolls and harassers can't post their shit on other users talk pages.---Mona- (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Now that's just a bunch of lies, Wigan. It isn't shit posting. It isn't trolling. It isn't harassment. It isn't stalking. It isn't "borderline creepy". Sorte is an editor of long-standing, his points are persuasive, and it's universally known that Mona is quite thin-skinned and unaccepting of any criticism. Archive? Sure. Delete? No. The both of you are frankly overreacting. I recommend Xanax or similar for that anxiety. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, Castaigne, you think doxing is fine but not "appropriate" (whatever that means) at this wiki. You believe the Palestinians and Israelis should do the world a favor and kill each other off. You don't believe in apologies or accepting them. You detest any form of idealism. You treat other editors like shit, and helped chase Carpetsmoker out of here. A few months ago you LANCBed after your insistence on reverting me was rejected by the community, and now here you are, back again. Now that you are done with CS, you can refocus on me. That you would suggest you are in a position to judge whether someone's behavior is or is not creepy is amusing.---Mona- (talk) 19:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

What I'm saying is that your online persona is malignant, rather like many who infest the comments at Youtube. The problem is not you; the problem is that such as you are tolerated here. On the Internet, the lowest forms a site will tolerate, it attracts.---Mona- (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

As there is no difference between how I am online and offline, I am amused by your charge of malignancy. I must be a terribly awful person in real life and everyone around me and in my life has failed to tell me so. Truly, I despair.

(I'm chuckling to myself, as I hope you can tell.)

Well, if you don't think I belong here, I highly recommend that you coop me and have me permabanned, in accordance with procedure. As you are someone with familiarity with legal issues, I'm sure that your procedural mastery will sweep me off the wiki as quickly as a doorstep is cleared by the broom. --Castaigne2 (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Chuckle away. Get a smiley face. Knock yourself out.---Mona- (talk) 20:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Mona wants to know why 'good faith' editors have to deal with 'bad faith' editors, which spiraled off into drama about Noam Chomsky: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...ired_to_interact_with_those_who_abuse_them.3F

I think its so ridiculous that people would accuse others of having mental disorders, pedo-apologism, stupidity, etc. It's absolutely ridiculous. This isn't a fucking playground. If someone is going to spend most of their time insulting one editor and reverting their changes, then they should leave the wiki. That is not what this wiki is for. We edit articles to the best of our ability and give constructive criticisms of other people's work if we see issues; we don't call each other simple-minded and ignore people's actual arguments. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

An IP editor brought up Mona's declaration of edit war against Sorte at the Chomsky article and was promptly threatened with a block by Mona for being an Avenger or Arisboch IP, then told to fuck off by Pippa: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...on_bar&oldid=1613821#Openly_declared_edit_war

Adam Morland wants to know why FuzzyCatPotato is interested in what "randos" think of RW, FCP reveals he has RationalWiki on Google Alerts: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&oldid=1613821#Yahoo_answers
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Rou
Hellfire said:
An IP editor brought up Mona's declaration of edit war against Sorte at the Chomsky article and was promptly threatened with a block by Mona for being an Avenger or Arisboch IP, then told to fuck off by Pippa: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...on_bar&oldid=1613821#Openly_declared_edit_war
Click to expand...

upload_2016-1-25_15-54-2.png


upload_2016-1-25_15-56-7.png


Mona has more in common with Ryulong than she cares to admit. Anyone who they disagree with is declared a troll, and both will go to great lengths to harass and drive off their perceived enemies.

[EDIT] The more I think about it the more it makes sense. Both also have their pet issue that they will go to insane lengths to ensure that their opinion is the dominant opinion for these wiki pages, no dissent allowed. For Ryulong it's Gamergate, for Mona it's Israel.4

And now FuzzyCatPotato has stepped in. In an effort to stop the fighting between Mona and Sorte he... punished Sorte. Mona gets to continue to do her thing without repercussions.

upload_2016-1-25_18-17-28.png
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Pesce, GabeRegan and APerson
upload_2016-1-26_15-59-38.png


Mona-senpai noticed us!

Mona is turning into a one woman wrecking crew, bringing drama into every page she edits. Here's her latest spiel.
upload_2016-1-26_16-2-20.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: chimpburgers
What's with all this Arisboch hate anyway? Fuck, the guy did practically nothing wrong.
 
Ryulong didn't do nuffin wrong

upload_2016-1-26_17-31-34.png


Adam will never stop with the Ryulong fellating.

In other news, Mona is angry over how we are constantly invading and ruining the site. Nevermind how she's trying to claim ownership over a supposed community project.

upload_2016-1-26_17-37-13.png
 
HipstrsGonnaHip said:
In other news, Mona is angry over how we are constantly invading and ruining the site. Nevermind how she's trying to claim ownership over a supposed community project.
Click to expand...

Quit your bitching Mona. We've been way too distracted dealing with the sociopaths to do anything on your shit forum. LOL.

Seriously wtf.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: lolwut
Hipocrite is back and lashing out at Mona during this coop. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop#Sorte.2FMona_Dispute
Go pal around with some fucking terrorists, you nutjob freak. Hipocrite (talk) 04:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

See people? I've been saying and saying, these hardcore Zionists are vicious and wholly unreasonable; only the GGers are worse. This one told me right after I joined that most people here love Israel and none of my edits would stand unless I too "think Israel is great." Well, I don't think that, and my position tends to be the majority here, so I get called all kinds of things by these types, including a "nutjob" who should "pal around with some fucking terrorists." Becasue they're just reasonable and civil that way.---Mona- (talk) 04:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

No, you illiterate psycho, I did not say that. Hipocrite (talk) 04:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Yup. You sure enough did say that.---Mona- (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Provide a diff of me saying that, you inveterate liar. Hipocrite (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

BTW, did you see the guidelines in the edit banner? Your not supposed to call others vicious names or otherwise insult them.---Mona- (talk) 04:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Fuck your guidelines. You and your ilk are everything destroying this website. Hipocrite (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

More Cuckstain-Mona interactions as well. Someone made an account called Pizzameister and jumped right into the coop, prompting sockpuppet concerns from Mona and subsequent salt from Cuckstain.

Now I have absolutely no skin in the game here, the only thing I would want to have is more, and above all, more civilised debate, but does this wiki really consider consensus to have emerged after but a few hours? I do think we should debate a bit longer. As of now I have not heard any arguments that have convinced me of the utter vileness of the accused. Pizzameister (talk) 02:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Agree with you on the time but wonder at your 20 minutes on the wiki comment - just sayin' Pippa (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I have experience at other wikis. And I have also read some articles on this wiki for quite some time. I have only recently decided to edit myself... Pizzameister (talk) 02:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

And why do you jump in first thing to vote -- VOTE -- on coop case about which you admit you know nothing? You have no background on this matter and it's unreasonable to expect us to explain to you all the backstory involved. You should abstain. Why isn't it your first priority to edit some articles?---Mona- (talk) 02:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop telling people what they should be doing. Your dictatorial tendencies when people don't grovel before you are not becoming. --Castaigne2 (talk) 02:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Mona tried to change policy to prevent the evil Avenger and Arisboch and KWF socks from voting: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop#Policy_shite

Only accounts 30 days old or older will have their votes counted
This will prevent all the Avenger/Arisboch and KWF socks from voting. Like having someone sign up and twenty minutes later their first edit is a a vote is here, as just happened. This will keep the KWF and other malicious actors from being incentivized to flock to this site and coop case.---Mona- (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

And what part of "We welcome new editors" do you fucks not understand? People can edit wherever they see fit. If it is voting on a Coop case then so be it...until such a time as policy is changed. Acei9 03:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Edit: Another RW user, TheroadtoWiganPier, has quit. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...nPier&curid=173570&diff=1614992&oldid=1594532

"So long and thanks for all the fish. RationalWiki is now the embodiment of everything I despise on today's internet. And that's a shame."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Rou, Randall Fragg, Cynical and 1 other person
Last edited:
I swear, RW in it current state is an insane asylum. Practically everyone who left is tired of the idiots screaming about the gators trying to rape them or the trolls trying to destroy them.

However, that's not a bad thing, just means those that remain provide us more entertainment with their insanity.

:popcorn:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, lolwut, AnOminous and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back