Manosphere Rollo Tomassi - Author of The Rational Male and Irrational Manosphere Blogger

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

chimpburgers

Big league
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Hey @Vorhtbame, you're really great at remembering all these people and jogging my memory. The first time I heard about this character was through Aaron Clarey mentioning him in one of his videos that I watched a few months ago as part of a compilation male feminist Kevin Logan put together mocking him as part of his Descent of Man-o-sphere series. Other than that, I wasn't fully aware of who the hell he was but I've started to look at some of his shit and see what he is and he seems to be a prominent figure in the Manosphere, so here's a thread for him and what I've been able to find so far. There's also a band called Rollo Tomassi but unfortunately we have to talk about this twat instead. I am trying to see if his powerword is out there.

Back in 2013, he released this book called The Rational Male and this is from the Amazon description of it.

The Rational Male is a rational and pragmatic approach to intergender dynamics and the social and psychological underpinnings of intergender relations. The book is the compiled, ten-year core writing of author/blogger Rollo Tomassi from therationalmale.com. Rollo Tomassi is one of the leading voices in the globally growing, male-focused online consortium known as the "Manosphere". Outlined are the concepts of positive masculinity, the feminine imperative, plate theory, operative social conventions and the core psychological theory behind Game awareness and "red pill" ideology. Tomassi explains and outlines the principles of intergender social dynamics and foundational reasoning behind them.

Oh shit, I can already tell where this is going but I haven't even gotten to his blog yet but if that's what this book is already about, then I'm sure this moron has already sperged plenty elsewhere and look he has.

These are some idiotic tweets from his Twitter page.

jIL5o0k.png

Tons of feminism sperging in the following link with a few samples from that advanced search result.

https://twitter.com/search?q=feminism from:RationalMale&src=typd

SIaV30w.png

Results for typing in beta.

https://twitter.com/search?q=beta from:RationalMale&src=typd

jbHK1JW.png

Yup, this guy is a fucking cow all right. This was just by typing in three specific words in the search bar and he fits the bill for a loveshy cuck nicely.

His blog is even worse and is chock full of these really long word salad kind of posts, like this one.

http://therationalmale.com/2016/03/14/plan-b/

I don't even feel like copy and pasting the whole thing here, it's way too long, but here's a small chunk from it instead.

In Betas in Waiting I explored how a majority of boys have, for several generations now, been conditioned to be serviceable providers for women once they enter a phase of life when they find themselves becoming less able to compete intrasexually. Anyone familiar with Preventive Medicine understands this (Epiphany Phase) period as the point during which a woman’s Hypergamous priorities shift from short term Alpha Fucks to long term Beta Bucks.

I also outlined the underlying plan involved in ensuring this strategy in This is now.

That was then. Now at 30 and (hopefully) with a learned and earned degree of merit, success, developed judgement, character and a reasonably well kept physique, a man finds himself in a position like no other – his options and agency to enjoy the attentions of women seem to suddenly be at an apex.

The planning women had at 19 when they told him to “wait for me at 30” now becomes more urgent as she becomes more viscerally aware of the Wall.

She knew this day would come when she was just entering into her peak SMV years.

[…]

For men entertaining women embroiled in their Epiphany Phase inner conflicts, not only is this a very confusing phase for the uninitiated Beta, but it is also an equally precarious period with regard (once again) to the consequences of his life’s decisions with her. Most men find themselves players in women’s meta-sexual strategy at this time because they believe that their perseverance has finally paid off. All of that sacrifice and personal achievement has finally merited him the genuine interest of a “quality woman”.

For the men who never learn a Red Pill awareness what they fail to understand is that it’s at this point they’re are expected to abandon their own sexual strategy in order to complete that of the (now Epiphany Phase) woman they’re considering a pairing with. Whether they were literally asked to wait for a woman until she was 30, the effect is the same, they have waited their turn, they have waited to be of service, they have waited to fulfill a feminine primary sexual imperative.


He's even got a Reddit page.

https://www.reddit.com/user/Rollo-Tomassi

vNeRqzx.png


Interview with the guy:

https://realchristianmcqueen.com/20...view-with-rollo-tomassi-of-the-rational-male/

Satirical review of the book mocking Rollo for being such a tard:

https://jamesflory.wordpress.com/2014/12/02/the-rational-male-by-rollo-tomassi/

Some other link I found.

http://livefearless.com/the-rationa...assi-connected-the-dots-that-stopped-the-mob/

Mentioned on We Hunted the Mammoth two times:

http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2...never-fart-or-fart-shame-their-flatulent-men/

http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2014/02/06/sperm-banks-prelude-to-male-enslavement/
 
Last edited:
I don't even feel like copy and pasting the whole thing here, it's way too long, but here's a small chunk from it instead.

Oh, if you don't feel like quoting Rollo, you needn't worry. He has a habit of quoting himself extensively. When commenting on other people's blogs, he will lift entire paragraphs from his own blog posts and paste them--as if each and every post he makes is the be-all and end-all; call in the dogs and put out the fire, there's nothing left to be said because Rollo done did said it perfectly!

In the review you linked, it mentions that Rollo isn't a Christian (or wasn't at the time of writing). At one point, a young lady challenged him to explain why any Christian should listen to the Biblical interpretations of a non-Christian. He promptly informed her that he was, in fact, a Christian--and a better Christian than she was. She asked him to square his active promotion of fornication and adultery with Christian morals (providing citations for him to rebut), and his response as a Rational Male was to blast off at her about how much she must hate men and what a ho-bag hypergamous bitch-slut she must be.
 
Ah, I was waiting for this guy to show up. You could probably make equally funny articles on his commenters. Has anyone done a writeup of the Mark Minter saga, or how Rollo got doxxed by some guy at Roosh's forum?
 
That will be corrected. Duly noted. How's your mom?

Actually, your initial impression appears to be correct. "Flory's" use of language implies that he's aiming for parody--for instance, in this post, where he states that the Tyndale and KJV are the only "true" Bibles, and often pauses to "gulp!"

It is quite possible that he's not kidding, though.
 
Actually, your initial impression appears to be correct. "Flory's" use of language implies that he's aiming for parody--for instance, in this post, where he states that the Tyndale and KJV are the only "true" Bibles, and often pauses to "gulp!"

It is quite possible that he's not kidding, though.
I reread it and you're right. He is mocking Tomassi through exaggeration and satire. Marjan is wrong this time but he did troll me with that.
 
I reread it and you're right. He is mocking Tomassi through exaggeration and satire. Marjan is wrong this time but he did troll me with that.

Well, I can't blame you. There are so many crazy people on the Internet these days, it's hard to tell who's serious and who's trollin'.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: mrdk_04
Ha. Must admit I wasn't trolling but was fooled, since I didn't read it but the excerpt you posted here. I just assumed that OP is wrong (she did as well initially, it seems). Why did I do that? Because I've seen hundreds of cases of worst stupidity on this site. If this were some other site I wouldn't have jumped the gun just like that.
 
Oh, here's something real amusing. A little old, but apparently the 'genius' Rollo is pretty easy to trick with Internet hoaxes:

https://twitter.com/RationalMale/status/725863525000732674

He really ought to have done a bit of research, because the that "Utah wants to outlaw porn!" story is a joke. It's from the bizstandard news (BS News) , and it's entirely false:

http://www.snopes.com/false-mormon-church-kleenex/

Didn't stop Rollo or his buddies moaning about how they're horribly oppressed, though.
 
This might not be the absolute dumbest thing ol' Rollo has ever tweeted, but I thought it was still worthy of comment:

https://twitter.com/RationalMale/status/737400539256754176

So Rollo's looking at a "sugar baby" (whore, pretty much) whose 'business' paid her way through law school and saying that's proof of both "hypergamy" and "men funding their own disfranchisement" (since the girl's going to law school, which, according to Rollo, obviously and axiomatically means she's a radical feminist who wants to enslave the entire male gender).

The funny thing is, guys like Rollo are typically big on prostitution for obvious reasons. But he apparently fails to understand that if this girl is gonna "disfranchise" men, so are most prostitutes, especially the more expensive/better-looking ones. Most high-end escorts use their "side job" to either fund a college education or supplement an income from a more conventional job (Allison Rapp being exhibit A of the latter), which guys like Rollo also claim they get only due to "affirmative action" or whatever. Maybe he'd think it was better in the Good Old Days, when prostitutes could only spend their earnings on drugs as opposed to higher ed, but then I'd say Rollo hasn't quite thought things through. STDs and crime strike me as worse externalities than something as vague as "disfranchisement."
 
This might not be the absolute dumbest thing ol' Rollo has ever tweeted, but I thought it was still worthy of comment:

https://twitter.com/RationalMale/status/737400539256754176

So Rollo's looking at a "sugar baby" (whore, pretty much) whose 'business' paid her way through law school and saying that's proof of both "hypergamy" and "men funding their own disfranchisement" (since the girl's going to law school, which, according to Rollo, obviously and axiomatically means she's a radical feminist who wants to enslave the entire male gender).

The funny thing is, guys like Rollo are typically big on prostitution for obvious reasons. But he apparently fails to understand that if this girl is gonna "disfranchise" men, so are most prostitutes, especially the more expensive/better-looking ones. Most high-end escorts use their "side job" to either fund a college education or supplement an income from a more conventional job (Allison Rapp being exhibit A of the latter), which guys like Rollo also claim they get only due to "affirmative action" or whatever. Maybe he'd think it was better in the Good Old Days, when prostitutes could only spend their earnings on drugs as opposed to higher ed, but then I'd say Rollo hasn't quite thought things through. STDs and crime strike me as worse externalities than something as vague as "disfranchisement."

I used to think "hypergamy" had a specific definition in the manosphere but nowadays it mostly seems to mean "women doing stuff I don't like"
 
I used to think "hypergamy" had a specific definition in the manosphere but nowadays it mostly seems to mean "women doing stuff I don't like"

So it's the MRA/MGTOW/PUA version of "problematic"?

Breaking News:

When doing research on another possible lolcow I found that he linked to Rollo's blog on his sidebar. That thread IS NOW OFFICIALLY OPEN.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jesse-powell-tfa.23075/
 
Back