Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Has she ever apologized for having been a cog in the massive wheel that allowed for the muslim rape gangs of Newcastle to do what they did to countless children? Of course she hasn't.

She is responsible for the mohammedan child molesters now? How the fuk do make that out?

Your massive hateboner for Rowling suggest to me that you are a troon. Those are the only one who hates her this much. Go dilate faggot.
 
She is responsible for the mohammedan child molesters now? How the fuk do make that out?

Your massive hateboner for Rowling suggest to me that you are a troon. Those are the only one who hates her this much. Go dilate faggot.
Having a profile picture of that environmentalist kid, edited to look stupider, while high horsing it about childishness and malding is also... Lol.

Responsible for Muslim rape gangs in Newcastle is a fucking new one, wow.

Coming onto the thread for laughing at Rowling derangement, to accuse the home secretary the police a fucking kids book writer of being any level of responsible for mass immigration and rape gangs.

Applause!

Truly, RDS comes available in a flavour to suit any taste.
 
Last edited:
I know I'm a bit late on this one, but I must confess, I'd forgotten about this brickhon (it was a blissful existence!) until recently, when people in the Tranny Sideshows thread were showing his gross nudes. Council of Geeks, a.k.a. Vera Wylde, a.k.a. Nathaniel Wayne, made a video over half an hour long about J.K. Rowling supposedly being 'a Nazi crime denialist' (because he can't technically call her a Holocaust denier, but you can tell he really wants to).

He's really mansplainy in this video (as well you'd expect, him being a man and everything), but there was one part that stuck out to me, where he talks about why J.K. Rowling is wrong.



He begins by complaining that people are STILL (and there's a lot of barely repressed anger behind the way he enunciates that one syllable, lemme tell ya!) saying things like, "J.K. Rowling just doesn't understand, no one's explained it to her." He goes on a long tangent about how people have explained it to her, and she just won't listen, presumably because she's an awful, hateful, evil person who just despises trans people.

He is seemingly genuinely unable to countenance the idea that actually, no, J.K. Rowling might just disagree with your beliefs, and that no matter how nicely you explain this bullshit to someone, they can still disagree with you and not buy into the bullshit, precisely because they can see it's bullshit.

People have made comments before about how transactivism operates like a cult and this is one of those situations where it's hard to deny. It reminds me of nothing so much as someone who is so deeply invested in a cult that they've become genuinely unable to look at or process the world around them in a way that is outside of the cult's prescriptive worldview. It's like a Flat Earther, who just can't believe that the globeheads won't accept the obvious truth!

What he says next though, is really funny, because everything he says about how delusional beliefs are formed could very easily apply to everything he, and to a greater extent, the trans movement as a whole, says and does and he seems completely unaware of any of this. Starting from a premise and working your way backwards to post-hoc justify it, reality not matching your beliefs, so you attempt to change reality rather than change your worldview - that's tranny shit.
 
Last edited:
What he says next though, is really funny, because everything he says about how delusional beliefs are formed could very easily apply to everything he, and to a greater extent, the trans movement as a whole, says and does and he seems completely unaware of any of this. Starting from a premise and working your way backwards to post-hoc justify it, reality not matching your beliefs, so you attempt to change reality rather than change your worldview - that's tranny shit.
They're very very good at projection. Sometimes it follows the DARVO process exactly. Don't think there's any cognitive dissonance for this type though, because that would require actual cognition to be occurring. Reality is only words and colors on a screen--completely malleable, the whole world entirely within their sweaty grasp.

Frankly, I just enjoy his Great Wall of Autism backdrop. Does the green thing in a yellow hoodie have some sort of pride flag on the front? I spy Funko Pops aplenty and some generic Nintendo stuff, but what the fuck is the rest of it and is any of it appropriate for adults to be so obsessed with? Most of it looks direct from the kids' aisle. If I saw him heaving and sweating in the toy aisle while shopping for a child, or even just walking by and seeing him drooling all over some doll, it would take every ounce of my strength not to mace him right then and there.

To get back on topic. Rowling mentioned in the Witch Trials podcast lurking on Harry Potter forums back in the day, and I enjoyed hearing her thoughts on and impressions of what she saw there/the interwebz in general. I'm sure she knows of Mumsnet at least, probably Ovarit, and I would think at this point she has at least heard of KF--maybe she really is lurking here. Sneed:feels:
 
She is responsible for the mohammedan child molesters now? How the fuk do make that out?

Your massive hateboner for Rowling suggest to me that you are a troon. Those are the only one who hates her this much. Go dilate faggot.
She's obviously partly responsible, like all the other insufferable, politically correct feminists and soyboys who made a performative spectacle over how progressive they were.
Rowlings fate is indicative of what happens to all slovenly tarts who bend over backwards to feminists and limpwristed boys.

It's incredible that you and others like you are so up your unshaven armpits that you can't equate criticism against Rowling with anything other than tranny-shenanigans. The world is composed of other things than your retarded crusade against retarded trannies. Seethe and cope over the fact that dipshits like Rowling dug her own grave by pandering to those possessing of equally poor mental faculties as herself, you delectably dumb cunt.
Having a profile picture of that environmentalist kid, edited to look stupider, while high horsing it about childishness and malding is also... Lol.

Responsible for Muslim rape gangs in Newcastle is a fucking new one, wow.

Coming onto the thread for laughing at Rowling derangement, to accuse the home secretary the police a fucking kids book writer of being any level of responsible for mass immigration and rape gangs.

Applause!

Truly, RDS comes available in a flavour to suit any taste.
"B-b-but you have a funny-looking avatar of a dumb kid. Checkmate, bigot!"

Seethe and sneed about it some more! <3
 
She's obviously partly responsible, like all the other insufferable, politically correct feminists and soyboys who made a performative spectacle over how progressive they were.
Rowlings fate is indicative of what happens to all slovenly tarts who bend over backwards to feminists and limpwristed boys.

It's incredible that you and others like you are so up your unshaven armpits that you can't equate criticism against Rowling with anything other than tranny-shenanigans. The world is composed of other things than your retarded crusade against retarded trannies. Seethe and cope over the fact that dipshits like Rowling dug her own grave by pandering to those possessing of equally poor mental faculties as herself, you delectably dumb cunt.

"B-b-but you have a funny-looking avatar of a dumb kid. Checkmate, bigot!"

Seethe and sneed about it some more! <3
lol calm down
 
She's obviously partly responsible, like all the other insufferable, politically correct feminists and soyboys who made a performative spectacle over how progressive they were.

How? How is she "partly responsible" for the paki child raping? Please explain this, because on the face of it, it sounds completely made up.
 
She's obviously partly responsible, like all the other insufferable, politically correct feminists and soyboys who made a performative spectacle over how progressive they were.
Rowlings fate is indicative of what happens to all slovenly tarts who bend over backwards to feminists and limpwristed boys.

It's incredible that you and others like you are so up your unshaven armpits that you can't equate criticism against Rowling with anything other than tranny-shenanigans. The world is composed of other things than your retarded crusade against retarded trannies. Seethe and cope over the fact that dipshits like Rowling dug her own grave by pandering to those possessing of equally poor mental faculties as herself, you delectably dumb cunt.

"B-b-but you have a funny-looking avatar of a dumb kid. Checkmate, bigot!"

Seethe and sneed about it some more! <3
Holy crap, we're back to the "woke author bad!!!!" era. Honestly quite incredible.
 
harrypotter.png
we take a break from accusing Joanne of transphobia to accusing her of antisemitism
 
He begins by complaining that people are STILL (and there's a lot of barely repressed anger behind the way he enunciates that one syllable, lemme tell ya!) saying things like, "J.K. Rowling just doesn't understand, no one's explained it to her." He goes on a long tangent about how people have explained it to her, and she just won't listen, presumably because she's an awful, hateful, evil person who just despises trans people.

He is seemingly genuinely unable to countenance the idea that actually, no, J.K. Rowling might just disagree with your beliefs, and that no matter how nicely you explain this bullshit to someone, they can still disagree with you and not buy into the bullshit, precisely because they can see it's bullshit.
This is a *thing* in American social justice discourse, which I first saw applied to black advocacy. The problem is never the argument. It's perfect and no person, reasonable or otherwise, could fail to be convinced by it. So self evidently true, merely hearing it recited converts the non-believer. Therefore the issue is that the person who does not agree hasn't truly listened, because if they had they would agree.

regds.png


"Why won't you just believe?" is what it comes down to. It's just the shallow, childish, unconsidered Tumblr activism coming from people who dress up in cause of the day because they think it makes them good people. If kids get fucked, maybe they ought not have been so fuckable in the first place. Or something. The argument is never wrong. The cause is just. Believe.
 
View attachment 5903179
we take a break from accusing Joanne of transphobia to accusing her of antisemitism
These people tell on themselves so much whenever they contort themselves to accuse Rowling of antisemitism. Every single time they just find some negative portrayal of a character, then say that makes them Jewish. At best they'll come up with a single trait that is sometimes associated with Jews like being a banker or being hook-nosed, but most of the time even that is just made up. Voldemort didn't need the blood of a Christian child, he needed the soul of a specific, non-Christian child whose soul he was entwined with. But stuff like the Malfoys being antisemitic because they're selfish and therefore Jewish, or Slughorn being lazy and sleazy and therefore Jewish. By this metric literally any media with villains is antisemitic.

Of course, there's about a 90% chance that these people think that Jews should be ethnically cleansed from the middle east.
 
Back