Serial Killers - Write thoughts and thunks about serial killers here

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
@Bunny Tracks
Let's be honest here, the amount that women get from men is a fraction comparitively.

It's like trying to argue that female serial killers are as common as male ones. Attempts to be gender neutral when gender just isn't neutral.
 
I've been listening to True Crime podcast.
My advice is either listen to multiple different ones on the same case or do not listen to them at all. Some are better than others in terms of objective reporting but they are all entertainment. The subreddit /r/unresolvedmysteries also has a substantial amount of write ups. Errors and omissions are also commonly called out for updoots. Not only does bullshit like that turn listening into a waste of time, it poisons the well for discussion and sometimes causes citogenisis.
Serial Killers: do you find them interesting?
I look at it as the terminal manifestation of sadism. From a psychological and philosophical perspective that makes them interesting. Similarly the techniques to investigate and prosecute are just as interesting. Kind of like how pondering what broke Chris is a primary source of interest in the farms, the techniques to catalog it all are interesting too.
If so, which ones?
The only ones I don't find interesting are really where there's simply an absence of information. Not like a notable 'unsolved' case but I mean facts just aren't publicly out there. Personally I try and keep a delineation between being interested in individuals as case studies and having "favorites" like some of the more ghoulish enthusiasts. Likewise some people will take certain cases/victims way too personally and make it about themselves.
Do you think they're born, made, or all 3?
It confuses me that there are only two options but you said 3. I think it can be one or the other, or both. I think there are people born that are broken like that and nothing will change that outcome. Likewise there's people that would rather die themselves than harm someone else. Horrific circumstances beyond imagination can drive all kinds of people into doing crazy things. We're already at a granularity where we're observing the outliers of the outliers. Can we really confidently describe it with anything more than very general trends?
Do you know any fun facts or want to deeply analyze a few, or maybe their fans?
I guess part of it would be my lack of understanding of people in general being unable to control themselves. Most people who get away with things for a while are largely lucky. If it isn't incompetence in the first place that does them in, it's complacency going forward and simply being unable to help themselves. If a genuinely intelligent and hardworking person put their mind to it, they could make law enforcement's job nigh-impossible. That they don't implies that they can't.

Hybristophiliacs are the worst of the worst in the terrible true crime fandom. Nobody normal needs to spend a large portion of time grandstanding to talk about how bad what these people did is. Having favorites or getting obsessed with a specific case just feels grody to me too. That whole attitude kind of precludes the kind of objective understanding that would sate my curiosity. At the same time I guess my interest could be insensitive for depersonalizing a lot of it. Part of me things it might just be one of those things about women I hate and do not understand at all (Let's be real here, this is a women's issue. When the oddball man is affected, they are thinking with their dick 99/100 times).
Are you an absolute deviant who wants to have sex with one and are crazy enough to defend it on the farmsp?
If you are, please tag me in at Mass Debates. I haven't had some good hate slinging in a while.

No particular order, not all serial killer specific, my notes in parentheses. Truly Criminal, Stranger Stories, Real Crime, Lazy Masquerade, EXPLORE WITH US (subchannels too, I will be the first to say their earlier content is rough, but someone has put in work lately), this is MONSTERS (moralizing faggot sometimes, but good facts to more than balance), Merc Docs, Serial Killers Documentaries, That Chapter (good presenter, well produced, a bit less depth than I prefer, very popular), The Crime Reel, dreading (crime and psychology), Hailey Elizabeth (good if you want to hear a zoomer drone about cases for a long time, does witchcraft with makeup), Cold Case Detective, Criminally Listed (bad audio), heavy casefiles, Unresolved, Trace Evidence Podcast (Unsolved cases but very good), The New Detectives (very early 00s TV show vibe), Georgia Marie (if you can get over an Anglo accent), TRUE CRIME Loser (he's on the money on the last point, but very topical), Real Stories (00s viubes again), and not always serial killer related but The Behavior Panel is good on body language analysis.
 
@Bunny Tracks
Let's be honest here, the amount that women get from men is a fraction comparitively.

It's like trying to argue that female serial killers are as common as male ones. Attempts to be gender neutral when gender just isn't neutral.
That's the point, though. There's more women lusting over of serial killers because there's far more male serial killers than female ones. If there were more female ones, I think we would see more.

Mind you, I don't think they'd ever be proportionally the same, even if the number of female serial killers exceeded the number of male ones, but I do think there would be more of it. Men tend to be less open about these sorts of things too, so that's another thing to also consider.

Simply put, I'm saying the number is comparatively small because there isn't a lot of female serial killers to begin with, and trying to pin it all on women when you had men on this very site simping for would-be bitches like this is just not true.
 

I always think about this guy. Fourteen years. Fourteen fucking years. How inept of a society do you have to be running to not:

Kill this piece of shit immediately

and

FREE HIM

And that's not even the only Colombian with crimes like that. Another dude killed and raped like, 153 kids. Seriously what is going on over there?
 
I just rewatched Bundychu's last interview after having not seen it in years.

When I was a stupid 16-year-old, I thought he came off as genuine. Upon a rewatch, he really seems like he's full of shit. (In my opion) He was still so concerned with optics during his final days, which is inappropriate but unsurprising. Before his verdict was read out, he maintained total innocence in a cocky sort of away.

He never concedes to expressing guilt or remorse in the interview — he alludes to it, but mostly seems inconvenienced to acknowledge the lives he's ruined. He refuses to say what he actually did with clarity.

The vaguest point of guilt has to do with the children victims who are mentioned. For some reason, he infamously never wants to talk about the kids he killed. Is that a guilt thing? I have no clue. It could be guilt, it could be about preserving his image too.

Probably the most generic serial killer I could've brought up, I know. He's the most recent one I've revisited.

Theres a very interesting book, IIRC it's called Confessions of a Serial Killer.

Two criminologists/authors took the time to talk to Ted and allowed him, in the third person, to walk them through each of the murders and see his motivations.

Creepy af.
 
Theres a very interesting book, IIRC it's called Confessions of a Serial Killer.

Two criminologists/authors took the time to talk to Ted and allowed him, in the third person, to walk them through each of the murders and see his motivations.

Creepy af.
Ah- could you be thinking about Denis Rader, BTK? There is a book with the same title, only it's about Rader, not Bundy,
 
I like to watch any of them, but I think the most interesting ones are Jack the Ripper and Zodiac, simply because I like mysteries.

I like the investigations, the science that goes into matching evidence, it is kind of like a puzzle.
 
I just always assumed that serial killers like that of Jeffrey and Gacy probably smelled like rot and pure ass.
Gacy's home began to smell after his first kill, I think. His wife complained about it, but he said it was a dead animal, IIRC. This was early when he still had her as his beard. When they split and she moved out, he had more time to kill boys. With more bodies, more smell, so neighbors complained; he claimed an issue with plumbing backing up or flooding or something. He then hired boys to dig around and spread lime everywhere down in the crawl space. Some of the boys definitely dug their own graves throughout this spree.

John remodeled pharmacies and had offered Robert a job when visiting the pharmacy he worked in. Robert went off with John, never to return. Investigators ran a background check on John, found his prior molestation conviction, and obtained a search warrant for his home.

Allegedly, Robert's female coworker had borrowed his jacket prior to his departure. She'd left a receipt for a roll of film to be developed in the pocket, which was in the jacket when Robert put it on and left with John. Subsequently, investigators found the receipt from Robert's jacket in Gacy's house, providing them the evidence of his presence in Gacy's home.

From this, they placed Gacy on round-the-clock surveillance and sat on his house. When Gacy realized he was being surveilled, he invited them inside his home as it was cold outside in their cars. Once inside, a detective wound up turning on a heater; the air coming in from the vents allegedly wafted in a decomp smell, triggering a second search warrant that ultimately lead them to 30 or so bodies in the crawl space. Oddly to the detectives, Robert Piest wasn't among them; he was dumped in the Des Plaines river as Gacy had run out of space.

I use the allegedly's because it was later admitted by the detectives that they'd fabricated the evidence to secure the warrants. IIRC, they likely coerced the pharmacy coworker to lie for them by telling them that John was for sure their man. Gacy wasn't stupid and wouldn't have invited them in if it smelled like death. He also mentioned the plumbing issues that should've been an okay cover (assuming the smell wasn't like straight cadaverine from putrefaction).

Given how freezing Chicago winter's are, the ground in the crawl space was likely frozen, too. I believe it took quite a while for them to locate Robert Piest's body as the river had froze over, too. Anyway, the idea that turning on a little heater brought on the stench of death seems unlikely. They almost certainly framed a guilty man.

For more information on this, I recommend Bob Motta Jr.'s podcast, Defense Diaries. He's the son of one of Gacy's original lawyers. It's this podcast that broke the fabricated evidence news.
Pickton is just an incredibly gruesome story, his whole live was disgusting and its one of those cases were is an entire community, no fucking way no one else knew that something fucked up was up at that pig farm. .
Robert Pickton is along the same lines. He got away with kidnapping and killing prostitutes in Vancouver, Canada for many years. He chopped up his victims and fed them to his pigs. Beyond the pisspoor job by the RCMP and their ignorance of the situation is a supposition that Pickton couldn't have possibly worked alone. Not only is it incredibly difficult to coordinate what he did, but there were constant parties at his farm and Pickton is assumed to be too dull and stupid to have planned it all out and carried it out so effectively. There's an assumption that Pickton was a fall guy, both for the group that committed the murders and for the RCMP and VPD who desperately needed to close the case due to public backlash.
I thought it was believed that Pickton was doing body disposal for the chapter of HA he'd party with?
the other three are terrifying because it wasn't just killing someone , but restraining and videotaping them for long periods of time for all sorts of torture. In the case of the toybox i remember reading how a ton of hillbillies knew the family had drugged sex slaves and they participated in the torture, they even raped them at parties or watch as dogs fucked the women while they all had a beer. The tape transcripts and the photos of the sex dungeon are nightmare fuel.
Did you see that a few years back, someone had submitted a public records request or FOIA for the files on the Toy Box Killer's case? All these years, the transcript audios online were just random people reading it, but the actual MP3 of his tape was sitting around.

Here's the actual tape the women would hear when waking up in shackles. Fucking horrific, this piece of shit. You can compare to the video of his talking voice in the YouTube video. It's always terrible to remember that he died before any conviction. He's not proven to have murdered anybody, by the way.
I'd like to know more about Israel Keyes, but that ain't happening, lol.
Post from another thread with more SK stuff, but relevant shit below is expounded on post-quote:
Y'all seen the John Wayne Gacy series on HBO, The Devil In Disguise? It and the Dean Corll one, The Clown and the Candyman are very good. Those guys were some of the worst, fuck. There was a decent podcast on JWG by the son of his first lawyer. He revealed that the detectives who were tailing John after Robert Piest went missing actually planted the evidence to get their warrant. Pretty interesting.

Oh, the Israel Keyes podcast True Crime Bullshit is seriously unsettling. I only got a few episodes in, but the dude describes what he did to that couple in Vermont and it genuinely disturbed me enough to want to stop. Not that it matters, but just for reference, that's not really common at all for me. Oh, Project Warhead is a great podcast on global efforts to take down those fucking weirdo CSAM rings.
The True Crime Bullshit podcast has a lot of information. I have no idea how it's doing now, though. I think the dude behind it started pursuing a bunch of random shit in the later seasons. I only did a few episodes of the initial season, but stopped. There's an episode that describes pretty graphically what he did to the couple in Vermont.

I've seen all sorts of fucked up shit online, know quite a bit about SK's, and am good at compartmentalizing when reading up on sickos. YRMV, but I was quite disturbed by that episode and told my GF at the time that I didn't want her listening to it (not in a controlling way; she just respected my gauge for what she could handle).

It should be noted that the FBI had absolutely zero information on the Currier's disappearance prior to him volunteering it. It sucks because Israel really, really wanted to be executed fast. He didn't want his daughter to find out about him being a necrophile; pretty sure he also raped the men, too. But he essentially told the feds that he'd give them more murders if they could speed up the execution and keep the gritty details private and out of the papers.

Unfortunately, details made it to local papers, he became less forthcoming, then subsequently killed himself in his cell. The interrogation videos/audios are online. His stupid laugh is so annoying, especially with how nonchalantly he talks about murdering that couple. He says something like, "nobody ever thinks something like this could happen to them." Ugh.

Random, but someone found him on Google Streetview about a year before being caught:
1760528553837.png

Those Gacy/Corll HBO docs are on torrent sites and are highly recommended.
And I’m being cliche, but the zodiac killer. He’s clearly not a smart man but the fact that his codes have remained uncracked for nearly 60 years… And one being cracked just a year ago! I don’t think there’s any real clues in the remaining ones. He doesn’t seem like someone who would ever give any real possibility of being caught, just clues, but I’d like to know what it says.
Why do you think he's clearly not a smart man?
But Zodiac is interesting to me because his killing wasn't motivated by some deranged desire brought out by the rejection of a mother's love or a spurned love interest or whatever. If it was, he never said anything about that.
Perhaps he was trolling, but wasn't he pretty clear that he believed his victims had to be his personal slaves in the "paradice" afterlife?
I take a lot of interest in cases that flew under the radar for extended periods of time. Most of the people we think of when we consider serial killers are like Dahmer and Ramirez: deviant degenerates with brains wired in ways that we can't begin to understand. What I like to consider are people like Leonard Lake and Charles Ng who created an entire rape dungeon and got away with kidnapping victims for a very long time, and then a very stupid mistake got them caught. As I recall, Charles stole a vice from a shop and Leonard came back around to apologize and pay for it. Shop owner wasn't having it and got the cops there. Lake assumed it was for the murders and committed suicide in the interrogation room after confessing and revealing Ng's identity.
I think they were driving the car of one of the victims and Lake gave a fake ID to the cops. The fake ID didn't match the car, but was linked to the rape ranch spot. The reserve officer who witnessed the vise being stolen got into the car's trunk, too. It had an illegal gun with a silencer on it. I know little about their case, but I think were cooked so Lake's cyanide wasn't the dumbest.

EARONS is a perfect candidate for flying under the radar, going on for extended periods of time (one of the most prolific criminals ever, IMO), and also involved a funny shoplifting incident, albeit not to get him caught. He's one of the worst to me. Him leaving semen everywhere got him caught, which wasn't even a concern during his heyday. He would've gotten away with it if not for science advancing.

It's actually crazy because they were going to throw out the last of the DNA samples from their freezer. I'm pretty sure it was actually Paul Holes who preserved them. Then he saw Barbara Rae-Venter solve the Bear Brook murders with genetic genealogy and linked up with her (though their use of that online database wasn't fully legal, IIRC).
That's what freaked me out so much about BTK, he was doing this stuff for years but at the same time he was by all accounts a loving husband and father to his children as well as Cub Scout leader and member of his church council. It's like there was this completely normal life built around a very evil core.
I'm pretty sure BTK was a controlling asshole who would fuck with people's dogs as the local dog catcher. He'd also stand oddly close to bushes.
1760528095988.png

Richard Kulinski AKA the Iceman was charged with 17 murders and claims to have committed over 100.
Ice Man is widely understood by folks knowledgeable on mafioso to be FOS with his exaggerated killings.
 
Last edited:
Jodi Arias wasn't really a yandere just a bpd standard hoe, those are dime a dozen. A better match was the japanese girl who stabbed his boyfriend.

Now there was a Hungarian one, Bela Kiss, or properly Kiss Béla. Known to be handsome, he was active in the 1900s.

He may dabbled in the occult, but his main MO was entirely money centered. He would offer rich widows marriage, make them dissappear by strangulation and pickle the bodies.

Eventually WW1 happened, he failed to pay rent, landlord messed with the barrels. Cops tried to hunt him down, but failed to find him despite them and the Axis MP going after him.

A detective in the US swore he saw him decades later, but he was never caught.

Any good non woke channel recommendations?
 
Jodi Arias wasn't really a yandere just a bpd standard hoe, those are dime a dozen. A better match was the japanese girl who stabbed his boyfriend.

Now there was a Hungarian one, Bela Kiss, or properly Kiss Béla. Known to be handsome, he was active in the 1900s.

He may dabbled in the occult, but his main MO was entirely money centered. He would offer rich widows marriage, make them dissappear by strangulation and pickle the bodies.

Eventually WW1 happened, he failed to pay rent, landlord messed with the barrels. Cops tried to hunt him down, but failed to find him despite them and the Axis MP going after him.

A detective in the US swore he saw him decades later, but he was never caught.

Any good non woke channel recommendations?
I just listened to a podcast episode the other day on the Bela kiss case 'Softcore History' great podcast but not really a crime podcast. I only listen to Casefile for my true crime, not 'woke' nice and monotone, no joke or opinions just a monotone timeline or a case
 
I found that Eye of the Chickenhawk makes a compelling case that Corll and Gacy were probably linked to child trafficking and snuff films and were not working just for their own gratification. Made the mistake of reading The Ultimate Evil by Maury Terry about the possibility that David Berkowitz was connected with the occult and did not act alone. There's some evidence that he and John Carr might have been working together, but Terry just focuses in on the occult to the exclusion of the most obvious question which is to what extent were drugs and drug dealing involved in Berkowitz' behavior. Im not opposed to the possibility of occult murders happening but Terry is clearly someone who makes up salacious lies about how the occult works with tenuous evidence at best and there's as much reason to believe Berkowitz was just terrorizing the Carr family. There may well have been some sketchy satanic stuff going on in untermeyer Park, John Carr and Berkowitz may well have been fascinated by satanic imagery, but Terry just makes shit up and is a big fat lying faggot.
 
I found that Eye of the Chickenhawk makes a compelling case that Corll and Gacy were probably linked to child trafficking and snuff films and were not working just for their own gratification. Made the mistake of reading The Ultimate Evil by Maury Terry about the possibility that David Berkowitz was connected with the occult and did not act alone. There's some evidence that he and John Carr might have been working together, but Terry just focuses in on the occult to the exclusion of the most obvious question which is to what extent were drugs and drug dealing involved in Berkowitz' behavior. Im not opposed to the possibility of occult murders happening but Terry is clearly someone who makes up salacious lies about how the occult works with tenuous evidence at best and there's as much reason to believe Berkowitz was just terrorizing the Carr family. There may well have been some sketchy satanic stuff going on in untermeyer Park, John Carr and Berkowitz may well have been fascinated by satanic imagery, but Terry just makes shit up and is a big fat lying faggot.
I've been involved in the true crime community since the early 2000's, and can tell you that Marry Terry's full of shit and much of his research is confirmation bias arriving at conclusions he already started out with. David Berkowitz in various interviews more or less invented the excuse that he didn't act alone or was involved with a cult, because he was trying to argue that he didn't get a fair trial and might some how be innocent. He's since flip flopped on these details, claiming he only killed 3 people, then admitting later that he killed all the victims, only to flip flop again and say other people committed the crimes. Terry was just propagating the bullshit innocence claims of Berkowitz. The crimes have a simple sexual motive, that women and young couples were targeted, because David was angry that women wouldn't date him.

I don't recommend too many podcasts, perhaps maybe the Atlanta Monster. Books on the other hand:

The Misbegotten Son by Jack Olsen: This is about Arthur Shawcross, who was convicted in his 20's of raping and killing two children, but allowed to plead guilty to a single count of manslaughter and then paroled back into society. Once out he began killing prostitutes and sexually mutilating them, claiming to have eating their severed vaginas.


When the Monster Comes Out of the Closet: This is a first hand account written by Westley Allan Dodd, and quite a rare book. It's mostly him talking about the child molestations and his fantasies, regarding how they evolved and escalated into murder and would have kept going. At times he talks about how wrapped up in his crimes he became, that he couldn't really perceive his victims as human. He alleges that upon being arrested he began to "rehumanize" and his feelings would change from time to time, wishing that he could undo the murders and waking up to nightmares of last moments of his victims. One child apologized to him as he was stabbed to death, another cried and pleaded with him.


Terror in Ypsilanti by Gregory Fournier: This is about John Norman Collins, an obscure serial killer who murdered at least 7 or 8 women. Collins was a college student and football player who even did some modeling for a body builder magazine, starting his career in crime as a date rapist. His first murder victim had recently gotten an abortion, telling people that a male friend had offered her a ride, only to drive her to a secluded area and rape her. She was found stabbed and mutilated. Collins later went to the funeral home where her body was sent claiming to be a friend of the family, asking if he could take photos of the body to have something to remember her by. The crimes would be notable for the amount of overkill and necrophilia present.


On the Track of Murder by Barbara Gelb: This book is notable for featuring the only major account on Erno Soto, who was known as Charlie Chop-Off. Soto was a mentally ill puerto rican pedophile, who was fixated on black boys after he and his girlfriend broke up and got back together. When they continued their relationship she had a black son now from a previous relationship which became an obsession of Soto's, who went on to rape several black boys and cut their penises off. Soto was never convicted of the crimes, because he kept checking himself into a mental hospital and then leaving, which then created problems, because the hospital records would state that he was in the hospital, when he really roaming the streets committing murder. The New York courts instead had him placed in a mental hospital again, and nobody knows whatever happened to him. Some records claim he may still be alive, just extremely old.

Deadly Thrills by Jaye Fletcher: About Robin Gecht a construction worker who once worked with John Wayne Gacy and how he involved his friends and co-workers in taking part in his crimes. Gecht had a fetish for cutting the breasts off of women, often abducting a woman, raping her and then cutting her breast off and throwing her out of his van alive. One surviving victim he cut a hole in her breast and used it as a sex hole, ejaculating inside the wound and taping it up. His buddies he then involved in the murders and would take back to the attic of his house where they would take turns ejaculating into the severed breasts from the victims at a makeshift Satanic alter that Robin set up, complete with upside down crosses on the walls. They then cut up the breasts and Robin would have his accomplices eat the flesh as holy communion. His accomplices were so scared of Robin that they initially gave statements implicating him, only to then change their stories for fear that Robin might get out. Instead he was only convicted of mutilating a few women who lived.


The Boston Strangler by Gerald Frank: The only factual account of the Boston Strangler murders told by the killer himself. Despite numerous books that were printed years later arguing that his confessions were false, Albert DeSalvo was proven by DNA evidence in 2013 to be the murderer of Mary Sullivan, the final victim of the Boston Strangler, just as he had said he was. A previous DNA test done by DeSalvo's family on some unrelated DNA from Mary Sullivan's body had not matched DeSalvo. This sample was found when her body was exhumed decades later and there was no way to prove where it came from. The 2013 DNA test conducted by police was on semen found on a blanket from the Sullivan crime scene, one of the last remaining items of physical evidence in the case.

Poem by DeSalvo:

Here is the story of the Strangler, yet untold,

The man who claims he murdered thirteen women,

Young and old.

The elusive Strangler, there he goes,

Where his wanderlust sends him, no one knows

He struck within the light of day,

Leaving not one clue astray.

Young and old, their lips are sealed,

Their secret of death never revealed.

Even though he is sick in mind,

He’s much too clever for the police to find.

To reveal his secret will bring him fame,

But burden his family with unwanted shame.

Today he sits in a prison cell,

Deep inside only a secret he can tell.

People everywhere are still in doubt,

Is the Strangler in prison or roaming about?



Cold-Blooded by John Gilmore: Gilmore has a knack for Gonzo Journalism and gets to know Charles Schmid, the "Pied Piper of Tuscon."
Gilmore would later become a major figure in the Black Dahlia case, when he attended a party in California in which he was introduced to a career criminal named Jack Anderson Wilson who was involved in burglaries and claimed to know details of the murder, and had a personal hate for Elizabeth Short. Years later Gilmore would encounter the Wilson again, who gave Gilmore a recorded confession to the murder hoping to profit off the murder, talking about the crime in the third person and claiming a friend had relayed the information to him. In this confession, Wilson alleged he had known Elizabeth Short from the bars around L.A. and was a friend of a friend of her's who was interested in sleeping with her.
Jack Anderson Wilson.jpg

Wilson claimed that Short had performed oral sex on other men, but had rebuffed his advances, so one day when offering her a ride, he took her back to his apartment and attempted to anally rape her at knife point. She had fought with him and he beat her and tied her down to a cot he was using as a bed and couch and tortured her, cutting her with a knife, made her eat her own excrement, stuffed her own panties in her mouth and then sliced her face up causing her to pass out. He then took some boards from his backyard from some cement work being done to the apartment building, and propped the body up in his bathtub, and tied her arms and legs to the toilet and sink, because the room was too small to easily cut up a body. He then stabs her in the torso and starts cutting her in half, when blood suddenly sprays everywhere, and he realizes her eyes are open and that she may not be dead. He then gives descriptions on how her two halves dangled into the water while stilled tied up. Gilmore after receiving this confession then turned over the recordings to police who wanted Gilmore to try and set-up another meeting with the suspect before they took him in to be questioned about the murder. However, before this meeting could take place, the suspect either committed suicide by setting his apartment on fire, or accidentally killed himself while drinking and set himself on fire. The events are chronicled in the book Severed, which features a transcribed version of the confession and was almost made into a movie by David Lynch. Many self-professed Black Dahlia scholars have since tried to bury Gilmore's book and attempted and failed to discredit him by editing Wikipedia to try and re-write history.

The Night Stalker by Philip Carlo: The definitive book on the Richard Ramirez case, featuring input by the killer himself. This is perhaps one of the best books on serial murder ever written.

 
I've been involved in the true crime community since the early 2000's, and can tell you that Marry Terry's full of shit and much of his research is confirmation bias arriving at conclusions he already started out with. David Berkowitz in various interviews more or less invented the excuse that he didn't act alone or was involved with a cult, because he was trying to argue that he didn't get a fair trial and might some how be innocent. He's since flip flopped on these details, claiming he only killed 3 people, then admitting later that he killed all the victims, only to flip flop again and say other people committed the crimes. Terry was just propagating the bullshit innocence claims of Berkowitz. The crimes have a simple sexual motive, that women and young couples were targeted, because David was angry that women wouldn't date him
You can tell that Terry just polluted Berkowitz from the moment he got access to him. In the book he even has Berkowitz clamming up in the initial interview and accusing him of trying sell a book. I'm going through and trying to get a revised picture of the Satanic panic period, because there's been cults that have murdered, and occult criminals, and murders by people who fuck with some Satan, but the mainstream of the day just created a false meme plex around the occult icons and faggy pretensions of the laveyan subculture and metalfags and allowed lying scammers and grifters like Terry to just glance through an illustrated book on esoterica, and fabricate a world of shit that didn't happen. I think there's a layer to the existence of Satanic and pagan murders that is quite probably realer than the current day mainstream would like to acknowledge, and it's because of liars and hysterics like Maury Terry that the well has been poisoned.

For instance, a couple years ago theere was a murder by the JNG cartel of four prospects whom they had kidnapped and brought to an isolated location to jump in new recruits. They way they do this is to convince at least one of them to murder their friends, then they are initiated into the cartel. I recall that pictures of the scene where this had happened showed a stable or barn with a bunch of hateful and psychotic messages spraypainted on the walls, some of which were in English too. I don't recall anything of a Satanic nature specifically being painted there, but it would not be surprising, considering the nature of what they were doing to these young men. Now, my point is that even if Santa Muerte and other such symbology in the cartels are just aesthetic trappings of a subculture and nobody involved at this scene is literally partaking for the glorification of a terror god, is this truly different from the death cults of old meso-american culture? In our age of secularism and the instrumentalized view of all knowledge and ritual, it is instinctive to us to see in such a practice only the pragmatic and selection and control forces of the ritual of initiation, but in the killing rooms of a long dead pagan god the priest could likewise accuse the torturers of merely revelling in wanton sadism without due deference and faith.

If the orientation is there, all the component parts are present, and the symbols and concepts provide the permission structure and affirmation to behave in the exact same way, is it not at least worthy to consider the granularity with which we assess the situation as mere crime with psychological effects, with only the pragmatic material aim or sadistic gratification as its goal, as a kind of reductionism? If you can say the purpose of a system is what it does, and one half of the system is the black market, and the other half is ritualistic murder that inculcates otherwise functional people with deeply antisocial behaviors and worldviews that integrate the symbols and aesthetics of something our forebears would identify as the work of Satan taking hold of their hearts, then are we lost in the sauce for not noticing this?

We all serve somebody.

Anyways I'm drunk posting. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.
 
I'm going through and trying to get a revised picture of the Satanic panic period, because there's been cults that have murdered, and occult criminals, and murders by people who fuck with some Satan, but the mainstream of the day just created a false meme plex around the occult icons and faggy pretensions of the laveyan subculture and metalfags and allowed lying scammers and grifters like Terry to just glance through an illustrated book on esoterica, and fabricate a world of shit that didn't happen. I think there's a layer to the existence of Satanic and pagan murders that is quite probably realer than the current day mainstream would like to acknowledge, and it's because of liars and hysterics like Maury Terry that the well has been poisoned.
One of the most annoying things when discussing the satanic panic era is that people gloss over some of the very real undercurrents that led to it and treat the whole thing as a complete fabrication by religious grifters. While it is true that those types glommed on to the panic for their own purposes, there very much was a weird phenomenon of these occult-coded murders taking place. I mean just look at the case of Richard Ramirez, if you made a movie based on The Night Stalker and showed it to someone who had never heard of the real story they would think it was some hokey horror movie made in the midst of the satanic panic era, but that shit actually happened. I think that part of the modern misunderstanding of the satanic panic is that for all the shit religious grifters did to distort/exaggerate the problem, the efforts of those types have been amplified tenfold by leftists who wish to portray religious people as backwards retards and charlatans rather than actually address the issue with any nuance.
 
Back
Top Bottom