Sony hate thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
>WipeOut
Last time i played that series was back in the PS1 days ( WipeOut & WipeOut 3 )

Are any of the later games good? Specificaly the PS2 and PSP ones because I don't have a PS3/4
Wipeout HD on the PS3 is pretty banging. I think that's one of the few franchises that greatly benefited from the shiny high res graphics and 60fps animations simply because of the kind of game it is. The soundtrack is also great. UK drum and bass is an excellent choice for the British made game.
 
How many hours will it take the average player to complete? At sixty dollars if its less than ten hours then the game is trash, if less than 20 it is average at best.
Agreed for the most part, though I can justify a game that is less than 10 hours at 60 bucks if it's an incredibly well built and tight experience that I can see myself replaying with certain regularity. Of course I just described a fucking unicorn, just saying that it can happen.
Why is every cover based shooter now compared to Gears of War?
Gears of War was the one that really popularized that shit by going really hard into it. Might not be the creator, but was the trend setter.
Wipeout HD on the PS3 is pretty banging. I think that's one of the few franchises that greatly benefited from the shiny high res graphics and 60fps animations simply because of the kind of game it is. The soundtrack is also great. UK drum and bass is an excellent choice for the British made game.
Wipeout is one of those series I just never really got that into... I really liked F Zero GX, but Wipeout... is fine, but that's the best I can say about it. Though I'm not much of a racing fan in general anyway.
 
How many hours will it take the average player to complete? At sixty dollars if its less than ten hours then the game is trash, if less than 20 it is average at best.
This is retarded and one of the reasons that we have the bloated, cookie-cutter, 5-year-dev cycle goyslop industry that we do now. Some games are great to play for 100+ hours, others I want to be a one-and-done experience that stays with me.

Besides, no-one forced you to pay $60 for it, wait for a sale if you're that autistic.

The Order is not a throwback to replayable single player games.

It's a cynical copy of the Gears of War format with extra Unfarted-style story thrown in.

How many times did you replay that?
It was nothing like Gears or uncharted. The only similarity is that you could take cover and shoot stuff. Which you can do in a thousand different games.

How many times did you play the game? Did you just read shill reviews online and not experience it for yourself?


Why is every cover based shooter now compared to Gears of War?

Because modern day gamers are clueless retards who lack memory or the experience on gaming before 2005.

So it's exactly like every other Sony game they've made since The Last of Us?
No, this one had soul and a good story that made you want to play more, not a violent gore-porn for the sake of making the gamer feel like shit.

The Order was an overpriced, glorified tech demo. Nothing more. Stop excusing shit.

Overpriced? lol, poor. Just buy it on sale if you're that bothered about price. It wasn't a tech demo, it was an enjoyable game.

You're the first person I've seen say nice things about The Order after it was new and the shills moved on.

My opinions are honest. I'm picky with games, but some just feel right. The Order was visually-impressive, not just in graphics but in design and in-universe aesthetics and the story was bad arse.
Dude, I had the opportunity to buy that game on a disc for like $3 at one point and passed it up because I heard about it being a five hour movie-game. And I could be wrong, but doesn't it also end on a cliffhanger that was never resolved? Or at least it had some kind of annoying sequel hook? I never played it. I just heard awful things about it.
Ignore what the niggerfaggots say. Some people tell you COD is the best eva, that fortnite is the greatest multiplayer game of all time or that thinking Battlefield 1 was a bad game makes you literally Hitler.

I try games for myself and form my own opinion. The Order is a nice break from the usual fetch-quest, mtx ridden, wokist dross that the majority of games are.

It ends with a gunshot fade to black, yeah.

In the words of Rich Evans, "What kind of 9th grade bullshit is this!? Gunshot fade To black!? They're not even going to resolve the other plot points!?"
It doesn't end with a fade to black. The 'final' gameplay section sees you execute a warewolf with a sawn-off double-barrel at close range. I saw the fade to black as the MC closing his eyes as he pulls the trigger because the Wolf was once a human.

and the final scenes of the game see the MC don a Van Helsing style suit while walking on the rooftops of victorian buildings in London, waiting to pounce on the warewolf menace.

The game had a serious potential and Sony killed it in favour of nothing, for no reason. Sony's old-school creativity and risk taking died when The Order died.
 
Ignore what the niggerfaggots say. Some people tell you COD is the best eva, that fortnite is the greatest multiplayer game of all time or that thinking Battlefield 1 was a bad game makes you literally Hitler.

I try games for myself and form my own opinion. The Order is a nice break from the usual fetch-quest, mtx ridden, wokist dross that the majority of games are.
I already don't like interactive movie-style games, and I don't care much for cover shooters, either. Cover shooting is basically Time Crisis with a controller. Just a chore to play when there's no lightgun involved. And now I don't have a working PS4, so the moment for me to ever try The Order has long passed. Passing up a game even when it's just $3 means I'm more concerned about using my free time to play that rather than anything else. The game didn't sound humorous or compelling in the least. The theme of fighting werewolves and vampires in a steampunk London doesn't compel me at all, either. The Order sounds pretty close to being diametrically opposed to my tastes. I don't like dingy games that take themselves seriously. Sorry dogg, The Order just isn't my cup of tea at all.
 
Ignore what the niggerfaggots say. Some people tell you COD is the best eva, that fortnite is the greatest multiplayer game of all time or that thinking Battlefield 1 was a bad game makes you literally Hitler.
Because early-CoD is better. :smug:
Overpriced? lol, poor. Just buy it on sale if you're that bothered about price. It wasn't a tech demo, it was an enjoyable game.
Is this you right now?
 
come one, you know that's a copout. if you sell your game for the same price as any other game, it gets judged like any other game.
It was a tongue-in-cheek reply. Did The Order get judged like any other game? Because I saw it get hated by people who never played it, who had no interest in playing it. The push was from shills and astroturfers who, at the time, had a vested interest in both Sony doing poorly and single-player games being received negatively.

I already don't like interactive movie-style games, and I don't care much for cover shooters, either. Cover shooting is basically Time Crisis with a controller. Just a chore to play when there's no lightgun involved. And now I don't have a working PS4, so the moment for me to ever try The Order has long passed. Passing up a game even when it's just $3 means I'm more concerned about using my free time to play that rather than anything else. The game didn't sound humorous or compelling in the least. The theme of fighting werewolves and vampires in a steampunk London doesn't compel me at all, either. The Order sounds pretty close to being diametrically opposed to my tastes. I don't like dingy games that take themselves seriously. Sorry dogg, The Order just isn't my cup of tea at all.
Each to their own, but it's really not a bad a game, not by a long shot. If the setting isn't for you then it isn't for you. It was more Sherlock than steampunk.


Because early-CoD is better. :smug:
Obvious statement is obvious.

Nahh. There's a difference between supporting/not unjustly hating a game and being a corporate cock-sucking ball-washer.

The Order received unnecessary, over the top hate, more than Too Human did. While both games have their fair criticisms, the hate-boner by 'gamers' against both games was beyond a natural level of disconcertment.
 
I can understand The Order being a good basis for a series, but as a stand alone title its just way over-priced and deserved the reaction it got. The epitome of graphics over gameplay (like the PS4 equivalent of Ryse) and entirely deserving of the backlash it got.
 
I can understand The Order being a good basis for a series, but as a stand alone title its just way over-priced and deserved the reaction it got. The epitome of graphics over gameplay (like the PS4 equivalent of Ryse) and entirely deserving of the backlash it got.
Tell me you didn't play the game without telling me you didn't play the game.

It wasn't meant to be a standalone title, and wouldn't have been if it had been supported by Sony and not allowed to be pulled apart by shills.

TLoU 2 is objectively a worse game than The Order, but because the misery and crapness lasts longer, it's worth it?

If you're complaining about price, wait for a sale. Anyone who buys modern games day one is a certified fucking retard and needs capturing in a butterfly net and shipped off to a looney bin.
 
It wasn't meant to be a standalone title, and wouldn't have been if it had been supported by Sony and not allowed to be pulled apart by shills.
Oh, and were the next games in the series going to be free to play? It was a stand alone title and failed as such. Never played TLOU2 but if the criticism of it that people have is that its "too long" then they can just stop playing when they've had their fill. Thats a bullshit criticism for game journalists who were forced to keep playing as part of their job. Even if it is a valid criticism (its not, put in another disc, retard) its still much less of one than the game being too short where you cannot get more no matter how much you put the same disc in again.
 
The Order 1886: Wet Ass Pussy Edition where the final boss is Ben Shapiro, a retarded neocon Jewish manlet whose sexually frustrated wife has turned the populace of London into werewolves again in order to fulfill her carnal needs.
Was it Ben under a pen name that wrote the article about his wife and the skyrim werewolf rape mod?
 
There's an Order 1886 thread:


The Order 1886: Wet Ass Pussy Edition where the final boss is Ben Shapiro, a retarded neocon Jewish manlet whose sexually frustrated wife has turned the populace of London into werewolves again in order to fulfill her carnal needs.
I'd argue that The Order: 1886 was Sony's last "non-woke" game. All White people, historically accurate setting, no pandering, full frontal female nudity. Fight me.
 
Sony actually has far more dead IP's that they're not using anymore than they do with actual IP's:
Twisted Metal
Twisted Metal just got a television show despite not having a game in over a decade. So they must be thinking about bringing it back or are already working on something. I doubt it will be as dark as Twisted Metal Black though.
 
There's an Order 1886 thread:



I'd argue that The Order: 1886 was Sony's last "non-woke" game. All White people, historically accurate setting, no pandering, full frontal female nudity. Fight me.
Wasn't there some pajeet princess in that game?

Anyway the game was wasted potential. The non standard weapons were great and it had a good setting. But it's barely longer than a movie. And never dares to make fights bigger than five or so guys coming at you at once. Could be because narrative trumped gameplay, or perhaps it was because the engine couldn't handle more NPCs simultaneously.
 
It was a tongue-in-cheek reply. Did The Order get judged like any other game? Because I saw it get hated by people who never played it, who had no interest in playing it. The push was from shills and astroturfers who, at the time, had a vested interest in both Sony doing poorly and single-player games being received negatively.
that's the default since videogames are mainstream, if not earlier

A: GAME IS SHIT
B: dunno, looks fun, did you play it?
A: DON'T HAVE TO, IT'S SHIT

gee, thanks for the informed opinion. I got a mate who has the retarded habit to regurgitate basically verbatim what's /v/ approved or not, which can be infuriating.

however, as someone who has over 200 hours in anthem and battleborn (each), you won't convince people anyway. at best you can recommend it to check out (if it's still available that is) with a good reasoning why, anything else is charging at windmills.

It wasn't meant to be a standalone title, and wouldn't have been if it had been supported by Sony and not allowed to be pulled apart by shills.
red flag right there. you make a single game first with options to build upon IF it is successful, not a cliffhanger. that's like trying to build an e-sport game from the ground up...
 
hat's the default since videogames are mainstream, if not earlier

A: GAME IS SHIT
B: dunno, looks fun, did you play it?
A: DON'T HAVE TO, IT'S SHIT

gee, thanks for the informed opinion.
Some games you can just look at it and know immediately it's shit

The sonic franchise alone has a bunch of them that at this point are considered "low-hanging fruit" regarding ripping them apart because so many people have done it.
 
Back
Top Bottom