goot1283
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 11, 2024
Meds??????? You are confusing me for a xitterfag, i am obviously not him.Its not cartoon porn its lolicon also the guy goot has admitted to downloading actual Child pornography
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meds??????? You are confusing me for a xitterfag, i am obviously not him.Its not cartoon porn its lolicon also the guy goot has admitted to downloading actual Child pornography
So it's about physiology? Well, how can you exactly quantify physiology so that you can then be draw a line between acceptable and not?Even if they are 17 years old they are still depicted as 14 year old girls they don't look grown
1. Stop doublepostingIts not cartoon porn its lolicon also the guy goot has admitted to downloading actual Child pornography
https://soyjakwiki.net/Zelligate
Funniest part is that massa said that they all look at least 21 and he never said that they are underaged so any argument saying that "zelligers are pedos" falls flat on its faceSo it's about physiology? Well, how can you exactly quantify physiology so that you can then be draw a line between acceptable and not?
1.ok1. Stop doubleposting
2. Okay, and so all of your responses to that is to spend your time here arguing whether cartoon porn is actually real child pornography or not? If you think it’s a crime, report it to the feds. I am looking over this discussion, and it seems entirely focused on whether cartoon porn is real child porn which seems rather off topic
One of your friends posted this wich clearly looks uderageFunniest part is that massa said that they all look at least 21 and he never said that they are underaged so any argument saying that "zelligers are pedos" falls flat on its face
Bro, you IMMEDIATELY after doubleposted. Stop. Put your replies in one comment.
>>stop double posting1.ok
When?2.We are discussing this because goot was revealed to be a pedophile
You saved the picture. If it is indeed loli, as you say, you saved loli. If it is illegal where you live, then you just committed possession.in a /soy/ thread, and after we exposed him he tried to derail the /soy/ thread, and now the kiwifarms thread.
But you are right THOUGH we should stop falling for his bait
One of your friends posted this wich clearly looks uderage
1. I or affy have nothing to do with that faggotOne of your friends posted this wich clearly looks uderage
Fair enough if that's what you meant.They do not look like they are 16 you are using the "muh 500 year old dragon" argument
I would spoiler that if I were you.1.ok
2.We are discussing this because goot was revealed to be a pedophile in a /soy/ thread, and after we exposed him he tried to derail the /soy/ thread, and now the kiwifarms thread.
But you are right THOUGH we should stop falling for his bait
One of your friends posted this wich clearly looks uderage
Apparently that's not him, it's from some smalltime e-celeb: Logo Daedalusfacedox
1.I'm double posting because i'm Phone posting due to my PC not working, wich makes it very hard to make long posts.>>stop double posting
>ok
>immediately doubleposts
When?
You saved the picture. If it is indeed loli, as you say, you saved loli. If it is illegal where you live, then you just committed possession.
Hmm... i'm smelling another pisscord falseflag.In current news, the farty found another afterparty retard outted for actual 'p.
View attachment 5980125
View attachment 5980128
View attachment 5980131
I know the person in question is fucking with 'eens by posting false info, but
>erm.... sweetie, I was only downloading and posting 'p ironica-ACK!!!!!!!!!!!
You saved the picture. If it is indeed loli, as you say, you saved loli. If it is illegal where you live, then you just committed possession.
>without a hint of irony saying that a picture of a teenager in an undergarment is CSAM1.I'm double posting because i'm Phone posting due to my PC not working, wich makes it very hard to make long posts
2.You are right that pic isn't sexual.I forgot to add that your friend captioned it
>Imagine getting your way with this brat
>Not liking people that say they want to fuck children is on the same moral level as the crusades>without a hint of irony saying that a picture of a teenager in an undergarment is CSAM
You people are legit lolcows.
We're approaching levels of moralfaggotry and pedojacketing that far surpass the Crusades or the Alcohol Prohibition movement. You people should go die in a Jihad or something
It's a pointless discussion. Not one person in this discussion has made a comprehensive argument for the immorality of 'loli' (if it even is loli). If your issue is that it's illegal, then report to the feds and that's that. Why are we focusing on these things rather than focusing on taking down actual pedophiles, people who actually harm children.>Not liking people that say they want to fuck children is on the same moral level as the crusades
Says the fucking shemmy user.Why the fuck are cordtroons in this thread?