Plagued Soyjak.Party / The Sharty - The altchan born from the ashes of /qa/; also a containment thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Brap above.
Снимок экрана (1903).png
 
i need to find the original /v/tan comic panel this image was based off.
good job Agent (((Goldstein))).png
neutralplier (gradient).png
 
Soyfaggots, explain why your entire culture isn't pedophilic in nature because of constant colored dick wars, cartoonslop obsessions, and the fact most of your faggot admins have been revealed to be degenerate and/or pedophilic retards running a site that is reportedly filled with teenage posters?
1736959607373.png
 
So if they're the same age it wasn't even grooming shit? Nah blud that's just called a breakup 😭🙏
Also am I understanding right that @Neutral Reaction admitted to gooning to 'p with him? The fuck? "He convinced me to do it" is a terrible excuse for something that vile
Isn't it more age appropriate to goon to 'p as opposed to regular stuff if you are a minor?

In any case I hope they both get "mental health treatment" but actually 100% for real and not as a joke.
 
So if they're the same age it wasn't even grooming shit? Nah blud that's just called a breakup 😭🙏
Yeah his story was constantly changing so I’m pretty sure he was lying a bit. Dr cobson stated his interactions with x immigrant only lasted for a single week, I highly doubt you can just groom someone into doing that shit in only a few days, so dr cobson was likely complicit in it.
In my opinion it was a faggot erp gooning steam chat. It just seems that dr cobson regretted having those degenerate conversations and turned it into a sob story of >I got groomed guys to attention whore like how he “leaves” the schlog every 2 weeks.
He also showed no proof of x immigrant doing the pedo shit he claimed he did so he was likely just trying to exaggerate the story.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it more age appropriate to goon to 'p as opposed to regular stuff if you are a minor?
pepe slight squinting.png[ANTI-NULL CLITTY LEAKAGE THUMBNAIL EMBED]

I'm just going to assume you're actually fucking retarded and not malicious. I will explain this to you in as terse terms as possible since I see this awful line of thinking a lot:

Child porn is of children, prepubescent people who should not be sexualized. Children who engage in sexual activities too early often end up with long term mental illnesses, damage, or unwanted pregnancies that they cannot handle and should not be forced to handle. Often times children are too stupid to fully comprehend the exact nature of what they're doing and the consequences of such, so we as a society put barriers between sexually mature individuals and those who are not sexually mature as a way of protecting the immature from being preyed upon for their ignorance, thus allowing them to make informed decisions once they reach an age of full sexual maturity, along side some wisdom, ideally.

Child pornography's production involves engaging children in sexual activities. Child pornography's consumption is more often than not a sign of wanting to do these things, which is behavior that must be corrected so people don't end up having sex with children and hurting them. Even if someone just consumes Child pornography alone, they're still engaging in an unacceptable social taboo that could involve into real abuse. Furthermore, child pornography, when monetized as it often is, proliferates a market demand for this kind of content when it is purchased and consumed, giving financial incentive to corrupt individuals to harm children. The consumption itself is a sign of defection and, through some mean, should be countered and cured.

Given the circumstances at hand, if its true he was blackmailed, he was an immature individual taken advantage of and, while under duress, did something heinous. He is a victim just like the children he masturbated to, and the extent of blame on him should only exist in relation to his ability to reasonably maneuver out of the situation with grace. In all likelihood though, this is probably a lonely, terminally online 15 year old who has poor exposure to the world, a poor or non-existent social support structure, a poor understanding of sexual and romantic relationships, and a lack of parental knowledge of his romantic and sexual life to aid in the process of a healthy boundaries and aiding him when he is being abused. However, this is a judgement call with no information and only a court could make a reasonable judgment on a topic like this. Given the lack of information, it's improper for anyone here to pass significant or sweeping judgement on the 15 year old for what he did given the information at hand.

However, on topic again, the idea that someone younger is okay to consume child pornography because of a similarity in age difference is a very corrupt form of morality that takes the exception provided by Romeo & Juliet laws to protect adolescence from severe statutory rape charges for normal, but frowned upon and discouraged, behavior and enshrines it as some kind of moral axiom and completely misses the point of said exception.

In simpler terms: The exception to the rule that we don't punish similarly aged young individuals for engaging sexually with each other should not be seen as a encouragement of similar behavior in regards to sexual norms as a whole. We merely have it so people's lives don't get ruined when they're younger.

Finally, the thought of a 15 year old consuming child pornography is particularly abhorrent for something you probably have not thought of: younger individuals have a greater ability to be influenced sexually during this time in their lives due to finishing out the process of sexual maturity. Consumption of child pornography could end up with the individual developing a pedophillic paraphillia, thus creating a new pedophile in the world that we all have to worry about. For the sake of everyone's children, the rest of society who has to prevent this, and the unfortunate new pedophile themselves stuck with this sickness, behaviors that create pedophillia and enable it must be stamped out.

Norms that permit this normalization and behavior cannot be allowed to fester and misinterpreting the purpose of the exception provided for those who are in an age bracket of dubious capability to engage with each other to further that normalization is behavior that can, and will, lead to malicious actors getting away with harming of others. It must not be permitted under any circumstance.
 
From what I can understand.
Dr. cobson (@Neutral Reaction) was in a homosexual relationship with X immigrant (Pedo Janny), they had a steam chat where they would engage in ERP and also goon to 'p. Dr. Cobson felt bad about gooning to 'p and other disgusting content with the pedo janny, so he created this exaggerated narrative about being groomed by the janny so he could play the victim card and say >Guys listen!!! The pedo janny forced me to goon to 'p with him, I am the victim, I did nothing wrong!!!
@Chudborean @LarpBait Is my interpretation of this drama correct or is it wrong?

Edit: I'm not trying to defend X immigrant (He should really ACK himself). I'm just trying to understand this whole mess.
 
Last edited:
Norms that permit this normalization and behavior cannot be allowed to fester and misinterpreting the purpose of the exception provided for those who are in an age bracket of dubious capability to engage with each other to further that normalization is behavior that can, and will, lead to malicious actors getting away with harming of others. It must not be permitted under any circumstance.
You could've spent the time writing this gooning with me in vc to 'lita instead.
neutralplier (headphones crying).png
 
From what I can understand.
Dr. cobson (@Neutral Reaction) was in a homosexual relationship with X immigrant (Pedo Janny), they had a steam chat where they would engage in ERP and also goon to 'p. Dr. Cobson felt bad about gooning to 'p and other disgusting content with the pedo janny, so he created this exaggerated narrative about being groomed by the janny so he could play the victim card and say >Guys listen!!! The pedo janny forced me to goon to 'p with him, I am the victim, I did nothing wrong!!!
@Chudborean @LarpBait Is my interpretation of this drama correct or is it wrong?
Am I the only non-pedophile brapzilian in this thread bruh
 
Dr. cobson (@Neutral Reaction) was in a homosexual relationship with X immigrant (Pedo Janny), they had a steam chat where they would engage in ERP
This is all objectively true.
also goon to 'p
No they didn’t masturbate to child porn, neither side has mentioned this before. Dr cobson claims that x immigrant admitted to masturbating to lolicon though he has shown no evidence of this.
Dr cobson also claimed that x immigrant asked dr cobson to send videos of him masturbating which would classify as child porn but he has also shown no evidence of this.
Dr. Cobson felt bad about gooning to 'p and other disgusting content with the pedo janny, so he created this exaggerated narrative about being groomed by the janny so he could play the victim card and say >Guys listen!!! The pedo janny forced me to goon to 'p with him, I am the victim, I did nothing wrong!!!
I agree that dr cobson purposefully made that story to make him seem like a angel that can do no wrong while x immigrant was the one who pushed him to do all of those heinous actions by grooming him (which makes no sense given the time frame).
If you ask me I believe this is just some attention whore mentally unwell (keep in mind dr cobson posts on the schlog nearly 300 times a day and constantly “leaves” the schlog every two weeks just to come back the next day, showing He is not very mentally well adjusted) faggot that made up a heavily exaggerated story because his steam boyfriend broke up with him. I don’t at all believe any child porn was in those messages and I doubt there was any lolicon posted there.

Most of the Jannies and a lot of the user base kinda agreed with this interpretation considering they noticed how much dr cobson was changing his story and contradicting it, and how a lot of things seemed too unrealistic. This just resulted in both of them getting permad on the schlog for being degenerates based on the objective info we know (the steam screenshots) and not the other likely bullshit claims.
I don’t know if they’ve been banned on the sharty tho.
 
Last edited:
Back