- Joined
- Jul 30, 2024
differentially_smelly
Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers
- Thread starter cuddle striker
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
My take is that it's actually going septic and the medical industry knows that these freaks are an lost cause the minute they get that surgery
ProximityThrill
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2025
Dolly Brooks
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
Especially since he shouted out Josh and KF and the SRS thread at the end of the Andrew Gold interview. Obviously he made a terrible decision but I find it admirable that he’s willing to tell his story to millions of people to prevent them from making the same mistake. I’d die of embarrassment during the first interview, let alone the hundredth. And then you’re reliving all of it constantly, which has to be a complete mindfuck.
What do you do when you’ve passed that point of no return? He has pain where his genitals used to be, so he wasn’t even blessed to have them be completely numb. You need hormones to keep your bones from disintegrating, but taking T would bring his sex drive back and cause more pain. Probably can’t find a good job because he wouldn’t survive the Google search. I hope he can find enough reasons to keep going.
#58fb58
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2024
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
Idk what you can even tell him. Practice letting go, go to church and seek comfort from god, go to trauma therapy...
Once the fantasy of SRS wears off, you are confronted with the grim reality that your genitals have been mutilated and you were the one who signed up for it. It wasn't an unfortunate accident, it was your own choice.
This must be really hard to live with. He is probably still feeling guilt and is angry with himself.
Dolly Brooks
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
I think I’m gonna need someone to wipe my phone if I die unexpectedly,
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2024
I always enjoy waiting until I have a bountiful harvest to post, and it seems it's finally time for me to bring in the basket. It's a grab bag today, so there should be a little something for everyone!
Splitting at the seams: a TiF shows off her grotesque top surgery scar that makes her resemble a lamp off of the Ed Gein Home Improvement line; to make matters worse, she's even kind enough to show us her gooey pink insides as her sutures tear apart. What leapt out to me, however, is that in another post she states that she is only 18 years old.
Ill_Ad6098 (Dr. Amie Hop; double incision bilateral cosmetic mastectomy)
Link | Archive
Big Trouble in Nipple China: after a little over a month since her teet yeet, a TiF's nipples have turned in their letters of resignation and are off to greener pastures. Despite anyone with working eyes being able to identify this as a complete failure of a nipple graft, as always, the perennial question of r/topsurgery is asked: Will My Nipple Be Okay?
Born-Annual6806 (bilateral cosmetic mastectomy)
Link | Archive
This tranny's stinkditch is like a Pokémon with two forms: at rest, it resembles a really long asscrack, and when he spreads it apart with his gorilla hands, it takes the form of a second asshole!
Objective-Corgi-7923 (Dr. Praful Ramineni; vaginoplasty)
Link | Archive
An update from Annual-Ad8425 gives us another glimpse into the God forsaken ditch he had carved into his pelvis, and if you thought the last photos you saw were off-putting, just wait until you see these! And from what I understand, this is after his revision! I gladly await his next attempt at finding joy underneath the blade of a surgeon, because surely the more you slice into such a delicate bundle of nerves, the better it'll be, right?
Last Post
Link | Archive
For some reason, the only time men seem invested in learning about the ins and outs of vulva anatomy is when they are in pursuit of an extremely accurate fascimile they can never have. For example, this troon has created an entire fucking diagram hoping for a surgeon to craft what comes easily during gestation in a mother's womb.
Downtothewitchesroad (Dr. Theerapong; sigmoid colon vaginoplasty)
Link | Archive
The thickness of this pooner's top surgery scars is so ropey, it could be used to hoist anchors into the ocean. Of course, because she has the same aggressively feminine socialization that all FTMs seem to have in spades, she sheepishly asks r/topsurgery if her results look normal. Hopefully the hugbox will descend accordingly to reassure her that no, she definitely didn't make a giant mistake, and her results look totally natural and cis, dood!
ThroatBackground7542 (double incision bilateral cosmetic mastectomy)
Link | Archive
The Shakespearean drama of Veinscrawler continues as he posts desperately for someone to give him hope about revision surgeries. The darkness in his mind seems to be dragging him deeper into madness every day as he writes: "I'm in chronic pain, have barely any erogenous sensation, have very little remaining genital tissue at all, and have developed worsening PTSD and suicidal ideation from how bad my dysphoria has become. I spend most of the day dissociating from my body and cry myself to sleep in pain most nights." He then arrogantly states: "I believe I'm genuinely more knowledgeable about many aspects of these surgeries than most people, including some surgeons." I've included some of his schizo ramblings under a cut for those curious, but it's VERY long - just a warning.
Last Post
Link 1 | Archive 1
Link 2 | Archive 2
Speaking of updates, here's one from a tranny we haven't seen since October of last year: ispilledmybean, who sported a psuedoclit that looked more like Athena bulging forth from Zeus' forehead than an actual body part, seems to be very unhappy over the fact that the surgeon who screwed him over the first time was more than happy to screw him over a second. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice...
Last Post
Link | Archive
Last Post
Link | Archive
Last Post
Link | Archive
Splitting at the seams: a TiF shows off her grotesque top surgery scar that makes her resemble a lamp off of the Ed Gein Home Improvement line; to make matters worse, she's even kind enough to show us her gooey pink insides as her sutures tear apart. What leapt out to me, however, is that in another post she states that she is only 18 years old.
Ill_Ad6098 (Dr. Amie Hop; double incision bilateral cosmetic mastectomy)
Link | Archive
Born-Annual6806 (bilateral cosmetic mastectomy)
Link | Archive
Objective-Corgi-7923 (Dr. Praful Ramineni; vaginoplasty)
Link | Archive
Last Post
Link | Archive
Lastest srs results
I don't know how should I feel and how long should I wait but this is not what I want.
Downtothewitchesroad (Dr. Theerapong; sigmoid colon vaginoplasty)
Link | Archive
ThroatBackground7542 (double incision bilateral cosmetic mastectomy)
Link | Archive
Last Post
Link 1 | Archive 1
Link 2 | Archive 2
[–]Veinscrawler[S] 1 point 54 minutes ago*
All tissues of "male" genetalia are direct homologues to tissues of "female" genetalia. Penile prepuce (foreskin) to clitoral hood, penile glans to clitoral glans, penile corpora cavernosa erectile tissue to clitoral cavernosa, penile urethral mucosa to vulvar vestibular mucosa, ventral penile skin to labia minora, scrotal skin to labia majora. This is because all these structures develop from the same parts of genital tubercle we all share in common as fetuses up until sexual differentation starts at 9 weeks of gestation. Usually by 12 weeks the external genetalia have developed, as either a vulva or penis and scrotum, and differentation continues from there. Our genitals differentiate even moreso during puberty. However, because these structures developed from the same basic tissues, they continue to have relatively similar aesthetics and functioning. It is mostly the positioning and size of various structures that differs.
What this means is that, at least in terms of external genetalia, those parts of "male" anatomy should be used to create the corresponding parts of "female" anatomy during feminizing surgery, and it should be roughly possible to mimic those homologous structures almost perfectly with minimal disruption of nerves and functioning.
However, that is not what most surgeons are doing. Feminizing genitals traditionally prioritize the amputation of the penis and scrotum over using those tissues in fully homologous ways that prioritize nerve preservation. This is partly because penile inversion vaginoplasty has been the standard for a long time, which means some of the penile skin and scrotal skin is being sacrified purely to make the vaginal canal for want of a better substitute for natal vaginal lining. But it goes deeper that that, because even surgeons who are performing forms of vaginoplasty that use only internal tissue for lining (colon, peritoneal, jejunum) are not utilizing the all of those fully available genital tissues in homologous structuring with preservation of nerves and functioning. They give various reasons for doing so.
For instance, it is customary among most surgeons to cut the scrotal skin both medially along the raphe and laterally along the "sides" of the scrotum, creating two flaps of scrotal skin which must be pulled posteriorly, removing so-called "dog ears" of scrotal skin and usually involving excision of a significant amount of groin skin as well.
However, doing this severs many more of the blood vessels and nerves in the scrotum, causing loss of erogenous sensation and sexual function. This also removes a pre-existing naturally smooth transition from groin skin to scrotal/labial skin, and creates the tell-tale lateral scars of on many trans femmes post-op labia majora. If the scrotal skin were instead only cut medially and folded inward, with any true excess cut off only medially instead of laterally, this disruption of blood vessels, nerves, and natural aesthetics can be largely avoided, preserving both function and natal labial aesthetics. And even for vaginoplasties that utilize a scrotal graft, the graft can come from the medial scrotal skin.
There are several surgeons who do ot this way, or at least a variation of it - Dr. Min Jun at Jun Surgical and Dr. Rachel Bluebond-Langner at NYU Langone, to name a couple - and some surgeons have even published papers on this - Dr. Worapon Ratanalert at Yanhee Hospital, for instance, who specifically hides the medial scars of the labia majora in the interlabial sulcus https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11984771/. Some surgeons still do some additional excision of perineal skin at the posterior part of the vulva in order to pull the scrotal skin more posteriorly, which is more disruptive, but the scars there can at least be hidden in the perineal groin crease. Overall, these methods produce much more natural-looking and functional labia majora than the more traditional method of cutting the scrotal skin and groin skin laterally.
However, both Dr. Min Jun and Dr. Bluebond-Langner use a different surgical shortcut for clitoroplasty, making horseshoe-shaped glans clitorises using only the coronal part of the glans penis (though I believe Min Jun may be moving away from this practice - not sure about BBL). This is done to ensure the the preservation of the coronal blood vessels and nerves, but it causes the visible clitoris to have an unnatural shape and flatness. This is just one of three different clitoroplasty methods that American surgeons and many others use - there really is no standard, and surgeon who says otherwise is lying.
However, it is not necessary to simply discard the other glans tissue, which can be kept at least partially attached and shaped along with the coronal part into a more natural-looking clitoral glans. Supposedly, one reason this is not done is because there is a higher chance of the clitoris partially necrotizing if more glans tissue is kept. Yet, strangely, that has not kept many other surgeons from doing it, often very successfully.
Dr Bank at Suporn Clinic does it exceptionally well, creating clitorises that in many cases look almost identical to natal ones. Dr. Bank also incorporates the remaining glans tissue that he does not use for the clitoris into the additional "Chonburi organ" for increased preservation of erogenous sensation (as the glans tissue contains highly sensate nerves). The Chonburi organ isn't really anatomically accurate to natal vulvas, but it shows again that it is possible to prioritize preservation of erogenous sensation without sacrificing aesthetics. And if he were simply to do without the Chonburi part, the clitoris would still be very accurate and functional. Howver, Dr. Bank does cuts off scrotal skin laterally and uses most of the scrotal skin as a vaginoplasty graft, though he does a better job with the scars than some do.
Another issue many surgeons seem to have is not making a clitoral hood that properly covers the glans clitoris anteriorly, often involving a clitoris that is placed relatively high on the pubic mound. Why they do this, I do not know. If anything there seems to be a focus among some surgeons on keeping the clitoris more exposed, which is just very strange and risks either hypersensitivity or desensitization from constant exposure. Many surgeons do not do it it this way, and I believe it has something to do with a difference in how the surgeons are placing the dorsal nerve bundle of the penis, which must stay attached to the glans, subsequently affecting the placement of the glans as well.
Most surgeons do at least follow the homologous route of using external penile skin for the external parts of the clitoral hood and labia minora and inner penile prepuce skin (foreskin) for the inner parts of the clitoral hood and labia minora. This is why circumcisions is in fact a serious detriment to vulvoplasty - you had your clitoral hood and a good chunk of your labia minora cut off. Some surgeons for that reason instead use scrotal skin for this part. Another reason maybbe because they are cutting off the penile skin entirely to use it as a vaginal graft. But this severs all the nerves in the penile skin, and costs the patient much of their natural aesthetic and functional difference between labia minora and labia majora (since said surgeons are still using other scrotalskin for the labia majora).
In fact, using any part of the penile skin for vaginoplasty (the canal) causes aesthetic shortcomings of the labia minora, such as the absence of a posterior fourchette or the labia minora not even reaching to enclosing the vaginal introitus, instead ending posterior to the urethral meatus and in some cases visibly diving into the vaginal introitus for the penile skin tube. It is one of the primary complaints many prospective patients have had about Dr. Min Jun's work, though he seems to have moved away from that practice. Dr. Bank is also known for making very accurate- looking and functional labia minora by using as much of the penile skin as possible for it, and he openly states that circumcision necessitates a subpar result.
Another issue that a lot of these surgeons have is that they do preserve a significant part pf the penile corpora cavernose to aerve as the clitoral corpora cavernosa. This robs the patient of clitoral erections (which are just as normal and healthy as penile erections) and has been shown to cause decreased sexual sensitivity and enjoyment in many patients. Dr. Bluebond-Langner, for instance, is known for achieving good function and sensation overall, but her apparent customary excision of the corpora cavernosa has caused sexual dysfunction and dissatisfaction in at least one patient who has posted on here.
Other surgeons, like Dr. Marci Bowers and I believe Dr. Bella Avanessian at Mount Sinai Hospital have recently been emphasizing the importance of preserving at least some of the corpora cavernosa for better sexual function, and many surgeons who do feminzing surgeries on intersex patients with clitoromegaly or pseudopenises are doing the same. Even a small bit of corpora cavernosa helps cushion the dorsal nerve bundle - the absence of this is one of the reasons I have chronic pain. I thought I was told that some would be kept or maybe that corpus spongiosum would somehow be used as a substitute, but that was apparently false.
Many surgeons refuse to preserve any corpora cavernosa because if misplaced it can cause painful swelling during erections, and because many trans women in the past requested it removed because I guess they didn't understand that clitoral erections are normal and it made them dysphoric (which is fair thing to request, but should not be the norm). But other surgeons' work proves it can be done without causing functional issues.
Really, what every surgeon should be doing is separating the two chambers of the corpora cavernosa to create the customary Y shape of clitoral corpora cavernosa and then largely burying them beneath the labia majora on either side of the vulva. Then they would function roughly identically to natal clitoral corpora cavernosa, contributing to vulvar swelling during arousal. But this is technically complex, and so nobody really does, as far as I know. But it's not because it's impossible - surgeons just haven't bothered to learn how to do it. In any case, not preserving any corpora cavernosa is an extremely common surgical practice that robs the patient of normal sexual function.
I could continue to go on about all of this, but I hope I've made my point. Effectively, there is no surgeon who is performing all of these aspects in the ideal way for preserving natal aesthetics and sexual function. And it's extremely frustrating, because when looking at the state of feminizing genital surgeries as a whole, it's clear that these different surgeons' best practices could very easily be combined to create a better standard for vulvoplasty (and I believe vaginoplasty would likewise have more of a focus on using internal tissues for canal lining, which we are seeing a significant rise of). But for whatever reason - money, ego, whatever - they aren't coordinating on that. And I think it's a real loss for all patients.
I would suggest that the biggest takeaway from this should be to avoid any surgeon who does not prioritize preserving as much of your natal genital tissue as reasonable possible. Because, regardless of what dysphoria says, your genitals are your genitals. You can change how they look, but you can not truly replace any part of them once lost. So make sure that you will not be losing parts of yourself future vulva in the process of getting one.
And personally, I would really recommend not doing penile inversion vaginoplasty, as it inherently compromises vulvar aesthetics. At worst, only use some scrotal skin for a canal graft, and only if you truly have a baggy excess.
I had very little scrotal skin, but the surgeon who operated on me insisted it was better to remove some of it anyway because apparently he doesn't understand how to make aesthetically and functionally accurate labia majora. I refused, but in the end he cut off nearly all of my scrotal skin, and now I have basically no labia majora at all as well as chronic pain in that area.
All tissues of "male" genetalia are direct homologues to tissues of "female" genetalia. Penile prepuce (foreskin) to clitoral hood, penile glans to clitoral glans, penile corpora cavernosa erectile tissue to clitoral cavernosa, penile urethral mucosa to vulvar vestibular mucosa, ventral penile skin to labia minora, scrotal skin to labia majora. This is because all these structures develop from the same parts of genital tubercle we all share in common as fetuses up until sexual differentation starts at 9 weeks of gestation. Usually by 12 weeks the external genetalia have developed, as either a vulva or penis and scrotum, and differentation continues from there. Our genitals differentiate even moreso during puberty. However, because these structures developed from the same basic tissues, they continue to have relatively similar aesthetics and functioning. It is mostly the positioning and size of various structures that differs.
What this means is that, at least in terms of external genetalia, those parts of "male" anatomy should be used to create the corresponding parts of "female" anatomy during feminizing surgery, and it should be roughly possible to mimic those homologous structures almost perfectly with minimal disruption of nerves and functioning.
However, that is not what most surgeons are doing. Feminizing genitals traditionally prioritize the amputation of the penis and scrotum over using those tissues in fully homologous ways that prioritize nerve preservation. This is partly because penile inversion vaginoplasty has been the standard for a long time, which means some of the penile skin and scrotal skin is being sacrified purely to make the vaginal canal for want of a better substitute for natal vaginal lining. But it goes deeper that that, because even surgeons who are performing forms of vaginoplasty that use only internal tissue for lining (colon, peritoneal, jejunum) are not utilizing the all of those fully available genital tissues in homologous structuring with preservation of nerves and functioning. They give various reasons for doing so.
For instance, it is customary among most surgeons to cut the scrotal skin both medially along the raphe and laterally along the "sides" of the scrotum, creating two flaps of scrotal skin which must be pulled posteriorly, removing so-called "dog ears" of scrotal skin and usually involving excision of a significant amount of groin skin as well.
However, doing this severs many more of the blood vessels and nerves in the scrotum, causing loss of erogenous sensation and sexual function. This also removes a pre-existing naturally smooth transition from groin skin to scrotal/labial skin, and creates the tell-tale lateral scars of on many trans femmes post-op labia majora. If the scrotal skin were instead only cut medially and folded inward, with any true excess cut off only medially instead of laterally, this disruption of blood vessels, nerves, and natural aesthetics can be largely avoided, preserving both function and natal labial aesthetics. And even for vaginoplasties that utilize a scrotal graft, the graft can come from the medial scrotal skin.
There are several surgeons who do ot this way, or at least a variation of it - Dr. Min Jun at Jun Surgical and Dr. Rachel Bluebond-Langner at NYU Langone, to name a couple - and some surgeons have even published papers on this - Dr. Worapon Ratanalert at Yanhee Hospital, for instance, who specifically hides the medial scars of the labia majora in the interlabial sulcus https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11984771/. Some surgeons still do some additional excision of perineal skin at the posterior part of the vulva in order to pull the scrotal skin more posteriorly, which is more disruptive, but the scars there can at least be hidden in the perineal groin crease. Overall, these methods produce much more natural-looking and functional labia majora than the more traditional method of cutting the scrotal skin and groin skin laterally.
However, both Dr. Min Jun and Dr. Bluebond-Langner use a different surgical shortcut for clitoroplasty, making horseshoe-shaped glans clitorises using only the coronal part of the glans penis (though I believe Min Jun may be moving away from this practice - not sure about BBL). This is done to ensure the the preservation of the coronal blood vessels and nerves, but it causes the visible clitoris to have an unnatural shape and flatness. This is just one of three different clitoroplasty methods that American surgeons and many others use - there really is no standard, and surgeon who says otherwise is lying.
However, it is not necessary to simply discard the other glans tissue, which can be kept at least partially attached and shaped along with the coronal part into a more natural-looking clitoral glans. Supposedly, one reason this is not done is because there is a higher chance of the clitoris partially necrotizing if more glans tissue is kept. Yet, strangely, that has not kept many other surgeons from doing it, often very successfully.
Dr Bank at Suporn Clinic does it exceptionally well, creating clitorises that in many cases look almost identical to natal ones. Dr. Bank also incorporates the remaining glans tissue that he does not use for the clitoris into the additional "Chonburi organ" for increased preservation of erogenous sensation (as the glans tissue contains highly sensate nerves). The Chonburi organ isn't really anatomically accurate to natal vulvas, but it shows again that it is possible to prioritize preservation of erogenous sensation without sacrificing aesthetics. And if he were simply to do without the Chonburi part, the clitoris would still be very accurate and functional. Howver, Dr. Bank does cuts off scrotal skin laterally and uses most of the scrotal skin as a vaginoplasty graft, though he does a better job with the scars than some do.
Another issue many surgeons seem to have is not making a clitoral hood that properly covers the glans clitoris anteriorly, often involving a clitoris that is placed relatively high on the pubic mound. Why they do this, I do not know. If anything there seems to be a focus among some surgeons on keeping the clitoris more exposed, which is just very strange and risks either hypersensitivity or desensitization from constant exposure. Many surgeons do not do it it this way, and I believe it has something to do with a difference in how the surgeons are placing the dorsal nerve bundle of the penis, which must stay attached to the glans, subsequently affecting the placement of the glans as well.
Most surgeons do at least follow the homologous route of using external penile skin for the external parts of the clitoral hood and labia minora and inner penile prepuce skin (foreskin) for the inner parts of the clitoral hood and labia minora. This is why circumcisions is in fact a serious detriment to vulvoplasty - you had your clitoral hood and a good chunk of your labia minora cut off. Some surgeons for that reason instead use scrotal skin for this part. Another reason maybbe because they are cutting off the penile skin entirely to use it as a vaginal graft. But this severs all the nerves in the penile skin, and costs the patient much of their natural aesthetic and functional difference between labia minora and labia majora (since said surgeons are still using other scrotalskin for the labia majora).
In fact, using any part of the penile skin for vaginoplasty (the canal) causes aesthetic shortcomings of the labia minora, such as the absence of a posterior fourchette or the labia minora not even reaching to enclosing the vaginal introitus, instead ending posterior to the urethral meatus and in some cases visibly diving into the vaginal introitus for the penile skin tube. It is one of the primary complaints many prospective patients have had about Dr. Min Jun's work, though he seems to have moved away from that practice. Dr. Bank is also known for making very accurate- looking and functional labia minora by using as much of the penile skin as possible for it, and he openly states that circumcision necessitates a subpar result.
Another issue that a lot of these surgeons have is that they do preserve a significant part pf the penile corpora cavernose to aerve as the clitoral corpora cavernosa. This robs the patient of clitoral erections (which are just as normal and healthy as penile erections) and has been shown to cause decreased sexual sensitivity and enjoyment in many patients. Dr. Bluebond-Langner, for instance, is known for achieving good function and sensation overall, but her apparent customary excision of the corpora cavernosa has caused sexual dysfunction and dissatisfaction in at least one patient who has posted on here.
Other surgeons, like Dr. Marci Bowers and I believe Dr. Bella Avanessian at Mount Sinai Hospital have recently been emphasizing the importance of preserving at least some of the corpora cavernosa for better sexual function, and many surgeons who do feminzing surgeries on intersex patients with clitoromegaly or pseudopenises are doing the same. Even a small bit of corpora cavernosa helps cushion the dorsal nerve bundle - the absence of this is one of the reasons I have chronic pain. I thought I was told that some would be kept or maybe that corpus spongiosum would somehow be used as a substitute, but that was apparently false.
Many surgeons refuse to preserve any corpora cavernosa because if misplaced it can cause painful swelling during erections, and because many trans women in the past requested it removed because I guess they didn't understand that clitoral erections are normal and it made them dysphoric (which is fair thing to request, but should not be the norm). But other surgeons' work proves it can be done without causing functional issues.
Really, what every surgeon should be doing is separating the two chambers of the corpora cavernosa to create the customary Y shape of clitoral corpora cavernosa and then largely burying them beneath the labia majora on either side of the vulva. Then they would function roughly identically to natal clitoral corpora cavernosa, contributing to vulvar swelling during arousal. But this is technically complex, and so nobody really does, as far as I know. But it's not because it's impossible - surgeons just haven't bothered to learn how to do it. In any case, not preserving any corpora cavernosa is an extremely common surgical practice that robs the patient of normal sexual function.
I could continue to go on about all of this, but I hope I've made my point. Effectively, there is no surgeon who is performing all of these aspects in the ideal way for preserving natal aesthetics and sexual function. And it's extremely frustrating, because when looking at the state of feminizing genital surgeries as a whole, it's clear that these different surgeons' best practices could very easily be combined to create a better standard for vulvoplasty (and I believe vaginoplasty would likewise have more of a focus on using internal tissues for canal lining, which we are seeing a significant rise of). But for whatever reason - money, ego, whatever - they aren't coordinating on that. And I think it's a real loss for all patients.
I would suggest that the biggest takeaway from this should be to avoid any surgeon who does not prioritize preserving as much of your natal genital tissue as reasonable possible. Because, regardless of what dysphoria says, your genitals are your genitals. You can change how they look, but you can not truly replace any part of them once lost. So make sure that you will not be losing parts of yourself future vulva in the process of getting one.
And personally, I would really recommend not doing penile inversion vaginoplasty, as it inherently compromises vulvar aesthetics. At worst, only use some scrotal skin for a canal graft, and only if you truly have a baggy excess.
I had very little scrotal skin, but the surgeon who operated on me insisted it was better to remove some of it anyway because apparently he doesn't understand how to make aesthetically and functionally accurate labia majora. I refused, but in the end he cut off nearly all of my scrotal skin, and now I have basically no labia majora at all as well as chronic pain in that area.
Last Post
Link | Archive
It seems that the other TiFs aren't being so nice to "futa IRL" pooner OspreyFTM, whose results I posted a little while back, because she looks like a fucking Greek tragedy reanimated. If you don't want to be treated like a freak, then why did you purposefully keep a rotdog + no boobjob set up? The stupidity of trannies is so appalling, it makes me wonder if they only recently gained sentience - not even sapience, but sentience.
Last Post
Link | Archive
As it would seem, a youthful transition does not a happy troon make: this update from 46XX_, who we last checked in on back in May, indicates that the circling of the drain has only continued for the poor lad. But don't feel too sorry for him, because even though he's borderline suicidal over his cock chop, he doesn't regret getting it at all!
Last Post
Link | Archive
Necrosan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 15, 2024
Meanwhile, in the next fucking sentence:
Sometimes I wonder if the brain, as a survival mecanism, just turns off one's capacity for self awareness and critical thinking. As if it somehow recognizes that, if the meatbag it's attached to connects the dots, they will inevitably jump off a bridge.
idk123456789
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2025
I remember going through his account months ago and he was both flexing the fact that he got srs at 18 and complaining about his unusable ditch, now I've revisited his account and he's trying to get other trannies to get srs because "Are you even a real tranny if you don't want srs?" and "If you don't get srs men won't think of you as a woman".
Anyways here's some facts about him:
-He came out at age 12, did DIY shortly but then stopped, started HRT at 16.
-Claims to be intersex.
-Claims to have had 10 surgeries.
-Claims to pass (He said he is 5'7 in the netherlands but he also said his head is bigger than 99% of men and women).
-Claims to have never busted a nut in his life and doesn't know what masturbating feels like, says his genitalia was different from a typical male because intersex.
-Rubbing his "clitoris" feels like touching his skin.
-Claims to have been a straight A student then after the surgeries he became retarded (?).
I'd feel bad for him if he wasnt constantly trying to drag others down with him and I'd feel bad for his parents if they didn't allow it to happen.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2023
Unfortunately she found that her parents had signed an arbitration agreement when they got health insurance upon her birth, so she was essentially told: "Sorry. Sucks to be you I guess"
sheepworldvizor
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2022
Elderly beef taco
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2024
But i thought hormones were magic and reshaped your bones?
Imagine someone dealing with permanent issues from having their hips ground down.
Imagine someone dealing with permanent issues from having their hips ground down.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
If you feel bad about yourself and your life always remember that you are in a better position than the many idiots in this thread.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
Ofc it does, the brain has a bunch of coping mechanisms to deal with shit it can’t handle. If there wasn’t that buffer of optimism tranny suicide rates would be even higher. How do you think people survived Auschwitz or WWI or the Trail of Tears or two months chained cheek to jowl with a dead guy on a slave ship? Or famines and war and pestilence and other things. Your brain hides things from you that would kill your will to live and highlights the bits that help you survive. If we couldn’t do this Jedi Mind Trick on ourselves our ancestors would have joined the 41% well before reproducing.
Only some of these things can be true. I’m going to go with “not intersex, always retarded, with an independent streak that his parents have trouble controlling.”
Hear hear that’s why I love Kiwi Farms
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2023
In the latest Olympic Games scandal, North Korean gymnasts have been discovered to have had 'body splitting' surgery.
Their bodies have been literally split from the genitalia to make their gymnastics routines, especially involving doing extreme splits, more impactful.
An example of the poor gymnasts who had this surgery is beneath.
Please to NOT click on the spoiler if you are squeamish or have body issues.
Their bodies have been literally split from the genitalia to make their gymnastics routines, especially involving doing extreme splits, more impactful.
An example of the poor gymnasts who had this surgery is beneath.
Please to NOT click on the spoiler if you are squeamish or have body issues.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2019
That's the Homer Simpson posted a couple of pages back.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2023
Rotdog feels so cold and numb that the body maps it as being a strap on.
Psychosomatically grows a harness for the strap on for realism..
all jokes aside though, why? Why does the skin look like this? Is it just damage from something?
Editing instead of Double Posting like a retard...
This one is already dead, she just hasn't realised it yet.
And as for this lot,
Even Gynecologist's can't tell!
Psychosomatically grows a harness for the strap on for realism..
Editing instead of Double Posting like a retard...
This one is already dead, she just hasn't realised it yet.
And as for this lot,
Even Gynecologist's can't tell!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2023
Imagine spotting one of those at the glory hole.
Many women are self-conscious about the shape of their pubis symphysis arch, it's a totally valid concern
FloydsFeedandSeed
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2024