Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
I don't think "up the thottery and abuse more substances" is a clinically recognized long term treatment for depression.

I've seen people here suggest Destiny is the cuckhold, now apparently Melina is the one in the cuck shed...I think perhaps, friends, the only person they've really cucked is themselves.

MrGirl asked him about this a while back. Destiny said he’s the one who wants to keep the relationship open and that he’d break up with Melina if she wasn’t cool with it. https://youtu.be/x4A92CuEfns

I can’t find the exact time stamp, but it’s towards the end of the conversation, like within the last half hour.
 
Last edited:
MrGirl asked him about this a while back. Destiny said he’s the one who wants to keep the relationship open and that he’d break up with Melina if she wasn’t cool with it. https://youtu.be/x4A92CuEfns
Every "open" relationship has two partners: the abuser and the victim.
 
Promises kept at his canvasing event in Georgia, he finally dyed his hair blue. (image isn't embedding for some reason)

The funniest thing if Destiny showed up to the keffal's lawsuit like this he wouldn't be the whackiest person in the courtroom.

hahawhacky.png
I may be ignorant, but has anyone else find it shameful nobody on "the right" has put together something like this for our side?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger
I may be ignorant, but has anyone else find it shameful nobody on "the right" has put together something like this for our side?
I already find it shameful that Destiny is doing this. Trying to exert personal influence on a state election in which you have absolutely zero interest as a constituent is disgusting to me. I have zero interest in trying to change the result of elections outside where I can vote, because I'm not being represented by their elected representatives. Doing so takes a kind of smugness on the level of "we did it reddit!" that I find revolting. Maybe that's just me, though.

But what else can you expect with rootless globalists who would just as easily sell out their neighbors for a cheaper price on the newest product. They'd break all principles of federalist governance if it means they get their preferred short term benefits, which is what makes them dangerous. It's the same type of thinking that's behind attempts to allow voting by convicts and illegal immigrants. And for what? The right to kill babies and entrench a one-party state? Disgusting.
 
I already find it shameful that Destiny is doing this. Trying to exert personal influence on a state election in which you have absolutely zero interest as a constituent is disgusting to me. I have zero interest in trying to change the result of elections outside where I can vote, because I'm not being represented by their elected representatives. Doing so takes a kind of smugness on the level of "we did it reddit!" that I find revolting. Maybe that's just me, though.

But what else can you expect with rootless globalists who would just as easily sell out their neighbors for a cheaper price on the newest product. They'd break all principles of federalist governance if it means they get their preferred short term benefits, which is what makes them dangerous. It's the same type of thinking that's behind attempts to allow voting by convicts and illegal immigrants. And for what? The right to kill babies and entrench a one-party state? Disgusting.
It’s overkill too, because we all know child enthusiast Warnock is going to win (real or not). This is the faggot behavior that’s always present with Destiny, even when he’s calling out crustier members of his clan.

Where the fuck is that asteroid we were promised?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Alexhypethrow19992
Melina has to be autistic, what response or assumptions did she think this tweet was going to get?
Nah she's swedish. It may look like autism, but it's more like autism adjecant. It's the assumption that others will be as open as you are. It's like a naive country kid coming to a city and being taken advantage off.
 
Does anyone remember The Last Psychiatrist? He wrote a book I cannot remember the name of sadly. Every time Melina or Destiny talk about their open relationship I'm reminded of one of his main points.

One of the author's main assertions is that cuckholds think/claim they get off from powerlessness and deprivation but it's really the opposite. The Cuckhold is at an even deeper level, getting off on depriving their partner of physical/emotional/spiritual intimacy.

Destiny's open relationship is that dynamic but instead of being hidden under layers of self debasement like a "traditional" cuckhold it follow's Destiny's MO of "mask off liberalism."
What's the excuse? Something along the lines of "how can I deny my SO sex with other people? I don't own her." That's really an excuse to go fuck random hoes off e-clout and she can't complain about it because the parameters are set.
When you choose someone to marry you're giving them a metaphorical piece of yourself. Call it ownership, call it safekeeping, but if you love someone you have relinquished some part of yourself to them.
Imagine everything you give to the person you love as a rubber band ball of emotions and dreams and loyalties, the "ethical nonmonogamy" people attempt to sepparate physical sensuality from emotions, possesion, ect. Like pulling a strip off the rubber band ball.
At best, it's one or both people massaging their own ego by trying to force the belief that relationships shouldn't have that element of "ownership" because "we're enlightened and past that."
At worst it's one partner sadistically getting off on not allowing the other person in or spitting back part of what the other person has given them.
 
Does anyone remember The Last Psychiatrist? He wrote a book I cannot remember the name of sadly. Every time Melina or Destiny talk about their open relationship I'm reminded of one of his main points.

One of the author's main assertions is that cuckholds think/claim they get off from powerlessness and deprivation but it's really the opposite. The Cuckhold is at an even deeper level, getting off on depriving their partner of physical/emotional/spiritual intimacy.

Destiny's open relationship is that dynamic but instead of being hidden under layers of self debasement like a "traditional" cuckhold it follow's Destiny's MO of "mask off liberalism."
What's the excuse? Something along the lines of "how can I deny my SO sex with other people? I don't own her." That's really an excuse to go fuck random hoes off e-clout and she can't complain about it because the parameters are set.
When you choose someone to marry you're giving them a metaphorical piece of yourself. Call it ownership, call it safekeeping, but if you love someone you have relinquished some part of yourself to them.
Imagine everything you give to the person you love as a rubber band ball of emotions and dreams and loyalties, the "ethical nonmonogamy" people attempt to sepparate physical sensuality from emotions, possesion, ect. Like pulling a strip off the rubber band ball.
At best, it's one or both people massaging their own ego by trying to force the belief that relationships shouldn't have that element of "ownership" because "we're enlightened and past that."
At worst it's one partner sadistically getting off on not allowing the other person in or spitting back part of what the other person has given them.
Interesting, but I think Destiny has been vocal that the whole reasons he's in an open relationship is because he wants to fuck random women whenever he can (and that he'd do it anyways, just cheat if the relationship was closed) and that's it's fair to have it open on both ends.
 
Christ.

Ladies (and Gentlemen) if your significant other ever tells you that if you don't let them have an "open relationship" they'll leave you, let em go. They are telling you that they are constantly looking for an upgrade and all they need to find is someone they can replace you with and are more than happy to toss you aside if you don't like it. Also, the moment someone brings the subject up you know two things, if you have a brain larger than a pea the relationship is over and they already have someone in mind to fuck around with. As the religious might say, they've already sinned against you in their heart all they are waiting for now is for you to OK it.

Move on.
 
Christ.

Ladies (and Gentlemen) if your significant other ever tells you that if you don't let them have an "open relationship" they'll leave you, let em go. They are telling you that they are constantly looking for an upgrade and all they need to find is someone they can replace you with and are more than happy to toss you aside if you don't like it. Also, the moment someone brings the subject up you know two things, if you have a brain larger than a pea the relationship is over and they already have someone in mind to fuck around with. As the religious might say, they've already sinned against you in their heart all they are waiting for now is for you to OK it.

Move on.
Not that I think it would happen to me, but I already know I'd tell them if you speak of this again, it's over.
No ifs, ands, or buts, the relationship is through.

Why do people want open relationships? I seriously don't get it.
 
I already find it shameful that Destiny is doing this. Trying to exert personal influence on a state election in which you have absolutely zero interest as a constituent is disgusting to me. I have zero interest in trying to change the result of elections outside where I can vote, because I'm not being represented by their elected representatives. Doing so takes a kind of smugness on the level of "we did it reddit!" that I find revolting. Maybe that's just me, though.

But what else can you expect with rootless globalists who would just as easily sell out their neighbors for a cheaper price on the newest product. They'd break all principles of federalist governance if it means they get their preferred short term benefits, which is what makes them dangerous. It's the same type of thinking that's behind attempts to allow voting by convicts and illegal immigrants. And for what? The right to kill babies and entrench a one-party state? Disgusting.
That's a brainless take. You need to win majorities to gain power, not just local and regional power. Trade deals and federals powers can always fuck you over, and where the federal powers are controlled by a share of people from across the country, you'll need to have those people to side with you instead of against you. What destiny is doing, is extremely useful and based if you are a democratic supporter, and its hilarious that bread tubers and commies hate him so much they counter signal useful engagement.
 
Back