Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[Harm]

wait, so you can't just insult people? And if you do, you can get sued for insulting people? If I call you a faggot or goat fucker, does that mean I'm saying you have sex with men or am I just insulting you? Zoophilia is illegal so am I accusing you of breaking the law?

You're not going to rhetorical question your way into a correct point on this issue. Calling someone a pedophile is defamation per se, as in it is codified into law that in and of itself it constitutes defamation.

 

[Drama Trauma]

So Destiny is so mad at Donut Operator and Brandon Herrera, because they called him or implied he is a cuck (which is true btw)
and now he falsely accuse them to be PDFiles without any proof?

He is acting like a teenager, this is not how a normal adult would act, even when they lied about their meeting with him.

I hope the guntubers sue him for defamation.

 

[Latrell Sprewell]

Tried watching a random Destiny video but I cant take it. Just had to drop this one here because Destiny has been reading court cases (with zero knowledge of the law) for two months so he knows everything there is to know about the law, clearly the smartest man alive that needs to act like a gay little faggot because he's so above everyone for reading court cases for 2 months. If you've ever studied anything legitimately in depth you would know that just randomly doing shit with zero guidance from anyone is legitimately nothing, 2 months even in the best of times for being fresh into a complicated field is nothing. This man is truly a sped.

View attachment 6232929

You'd just need to remind him that he played League of Legends for years and never progressed beyond Diamond league. His two months of reading cases means shit in comparison.

He's not showing off any firm knowledge of the legal system, he's just posturing and bullshitting while sprinkling in tidbits of information. (How does him reading Supreme Court cases prepare him to tell the relationship between an indictment and a conviction?) It's far easier to do that in an intellectual field than in a multiplayer game, because in the game you'd have to argue against what your win-loss record or your ladder rank says, and people are pretty well primed to look at a complaint like that and assume the guy is upset that their skill doesn't match their ego.

 

[kusario]

You're not going to rhetorical question your way into a correct point on this issue. Calling someone a pedophile is defamation per se, as in it is codified into law that in and of itself it constitutes defamation.

just like calling someone a goat fucker

I'm not "rhetorical questioning" my way into a correct point - that was my point from the start

 

[Hillary Clinton's Ass]

just like calling someone a goat fucker

I'm not "rhetorical questioning" my way into a correct point - that was my point from the start

Hey bro, since you're a Destiny Foot Soldier and all, quick question.

Why do you defend him every time? Did he offered you to gurgle your cum? Or is it the other way around? Or are you just doing for free, cumjanny?

 

[kusario]

Hey bro, since you're a Destiny Foot Soldier and all, quick question.

Why do you defend him every time? Did he offered you to gurgle your cum? Or is it the other way around? Or are you just doing for free, cumjanny?

Hey, thanks for asking! He offered me to swim in his cum-pool, chill in his cum-jacuzzi and later go on a drive in his cum-fueled sports car but unfortunately all of you faggots that keep posting and thinking about cum and his cock 24/7 were already there so I had to dip because it was too crowded

 

[Code Cave]

Just had to drop this one here because Destiny has been reading court cases (with zero knowledge of the law) for two months so he knows everything there is to know about the law, clearly the smartest man alive that needs to act like a gay little faggot because he's so above everyone for reading court cases for 2 months.

I've noticed him doing this a lot recently. He done it in the Finkelstein debate too, where he read the ICJ case literally the night before, then acts incredulous that other people haven't read it.

You'd just need to remind him that he played League of Legends for years and never progressed beyond Diamond league. His two months of reading cases means shit in comparison.

Saying he reached Diamond is stolen valor - he had to get boosted by duoing with better players. When he tried playing solo he was hardstuck in gold.

 

[Harm]

Saying he reached Diamond is stolen valor - he had to get boosted by duoing with better players.

So what you're saying is Steve is a carried diamond?

 

[Lats of Peace]

Why would say this? Where anyone said he was? What do you think was the point of the sentence you responding to?


yes, have you?


wait, so you can't just insult people? And if you do, you can get sued for insulting people? If I call you a faggot or goat fucker, does that mean I'm saying you have sex with men or am I just insulting you? Zoophilia is illegal so am I accusing you of breaking the law?

Calling someone a faggot wouldn't be defamatory because a) it has a common use meaning a weak bitch like Destiny b) being a homo isn't considered bad anymore even though it should. Goat fucker is probably too absurd to be considered seriously so it would get a pass.

Pedophile on the other hand is considered one of the worst things imaginable. I don't think it's going to come to anything because there are no damages (yet) and Tiny hides videos so the argument could be that the reach is minimal. It's really fucking stupid to go around calling people pedophiles when it could fuck with their reputation and money source, though. Really fucking stupid.

 

[Kars den Karb]

Yes, Destiny is not telling the truth but he isn't lying, trying to deceive people into thinking all of those guys are actually pedos, he isn't accusing them of any criminal sexual misconduct nor he isn't trying to damage their reputation. He just insults them to make them feels bad.

I feel it's unlikely that lawsuits actually happen, but do you think that "insults them to make them feels bad" is a legal distinction when you are claiming someone is a pedo?

 

[Rimanah]

He's not showing off any firm knowledge of the legal system, he's just posturing and bullshitting while sprinkling in tidbits of information. (How does him reading Supreme Court cases prepare him to tell the relationship between an indictment and a conviction?)

I will note that reading cases is a huge part of how law is taught in law school. I’ll also note that’s under the auspices of a professor, and the employment of the Socratic method.
I’ll also note that most other lawyers I’ve met agree that law school does a terrible job preparing you for practice.
Make of these what you will.

I feel it's unlikely that lawsuits actually happen, but do you think that "insults them to make them feels bad" is a legal distinction when you are claiming someone is a pedo?

“It’s just an insult bro” is not a defense to a defamation, and that foot soldier is retarded to suggest as such.
Any amount of critical thinking (tough, very tough, for tiny and co. I know) would show why.

 

[Latrell Sprewell]

Saying he reached Diamond is stolen valor - he had to get boosted by duoing with better players. When he tried playing solo he was hardstuck in gold.

And now he's getting his legitimacy boosted by duo-debating alongside credentialed historians like Benny Morris.

It's like poetry, it rhymes.

 

[Rimanah]

Again, just like calling someone a goat fucker - you usually don't mean that the person is actually a zoophile but rather that he has moral value of a goat fucker. Person being called a goat fucker isn't actually offended by the other person thinking they're actually fucking goats but rather that the insulting person has no respect for them.

You completely misunderstand the point of defamation law. It’s not to protect the feelings of the targeted party. It’s to protect their reputation. Thus, the question of “offense” plays no role in the analysis, outside of possible damages questions.
This misunderstanding undercuts the entire argument.

it's comical for people like don't understand that the statement of fact behind calling someone a pedo is also important - Destiny did nothing to produce a solid statement of fact that those guys really are pedos. He even went further - he hyperbolized and said unrealistic fucking scenarios about them, further establishing the point wasn't to actually spread serious allegation with intent to damage their reputations but rather shit talk in the worst possible way.

Again, you’re just highlighting how little you understand about the law. The lack of evidence for the assertion only makes it more likely to be defamatory, not less. If a defendant produces evidence supporting the assertion that they believe they’re making a factual statement, then they can assert truth as a defense.
Absent that evidence, the defendant finds themselves in a worse position. Because they made harmful statements that they don’t even have evidence for. That’s textbook defamation.

The hyperbole isn’t a question of law, but wades into fact finder territory. Meaning that you’d present it to the fact finder and argue that it wouldn’t harm the plaintiff’s reputation because it’s so outlandish no reasonable person could believe it.

 

[Elderly Homosexual Negro]

Destiny is debating Andrew Wilson later tonight if things haven't gone awry.

 

[GlibJeefy]

You completely misunderstand the point of defamation law. It’s not to protect the feelings of the targeted party. It’s to protect their reputation. Thus, the question of “offense” plays no role in the analysis, outside of possible damages questions.
This misunderstanding undercuts the entire argument.

Again, you’re just highlighting how little you understand about the law. The lack of evidence for the assertion only makes it more likely to be defamatory, not less. If a defendant produces evidence supporting the assertion that they believe they’re making a factual statement, then they can assert truth as a defense.
Absent that evidence, the defendant finds themselves in a worse position. Because they made harmful statements that they don’t even have evidence for. That’s textbook defamation.

The hyperbole isn’t a question of law, but wades into fact finder territory. Meaning that you’d present it to the fact finder and argue that it wouldn’t harm the plaintiff’s reputation because it’s so outlandish no reasonable person could believe it.

Also, destiny didn't just say the donut operator was a pedophile. That statement could be defensible given the fact that slander typically requires some evidence of tangible damage, reputational or otherwise. However, destiny also said at least a couple of times that donut operator jerked off to "kiddie porn" right in front of him, an obvious crime (owning cp) which means it would have a lower bar than typical slander as damages can be presumed. He probably has a defense in saying that he was just joking but the stated malicious intent (meaning donut operator's status as a public figure doesn't really matter) combined with a slanderous claim that so obviously meets the requirement of slander per se (no need to prove damages in this case) might push the needle in donut operator's favor in a court of law. I doubt donut operator will sue, whatever the reason, but he'd probably have a better case than tiny and his footsoldiers think.

 

[Nate Higgers]

You're not going to rhetorical question your way into a correct point on this issue.

He’s clearly a Destiny FootSoldier because he’s trying to mimic Tiny’s “argumentation style”, only without the fistfuls of amphetamines.

 

[Saint Eustace's Stag]

So Destiny is arguing with xQc that what Chris Tyson did wasn't bad because back in the day r/jailbait was a popular subreddit and everyone made edgy sexual statements to their friends. Now I don't know what kind of friends Destiny has, but I do not flirt and make constant sexual jokes with my friends the way Chris did (Come to think of it, basically all of Destiny's "friends" are women so of course he flirts with them all). And what is this weird self-report about r/jailbait? Just because a lot of men liked young looking girls means that there isn't an issue with talking sexually to teenagers? He also can't see how Chris being openly bisexual at the time changes the interaction. A sexual joke made between two straight friends vs. a sexual joke made between a bi man and a young male are two very different things.

 

[Brap God]

Hooly shit, xqc of all people is cooking the shit out of tiny rn. You can't even make up how bad tiny's arguments are.
Chris is apparently only targeted for being a tranny, and "everyone back then on the internet was that level of degen". And he keeps talking about some fappening subreddit and a jailbait one from around the time. Like, who cares lil bro? You're just outing your personal interests at the time. And you know it's bad when the defense is that other degens exist. No shit, Sherlock. On the tranny point, are people cheering that a tranny got exposed? Sure. Was he targeted for it? Not anymore than any other known online figure, retard. Commentary jewtubers are equal opportunity faggots, they just need to sniff out blood in the water and it's fair game. Replace Tyson with someone tiny deems persona non-grata and he'd be jumping down their throat over this shit.

 

[Harm]

you know it's bad when the defense is that other degens exist

Horrible argument by Destiny. Incriminating others doesn't exonerate anyone.

Replace Tyson with someone tiny deems persona non-grata and he'd be jumping down their throat over this shit.

Yep. If Donut Operator was the one outed for grooming minors and buying Shadman art then we all know how his tune would change.

 

[kiwiburgerplanet]

Pretty much, he seems to be really ashamed of it. I really don't even understand what he's doing if it's a "memeing" his way out of it situation or just genuine projection.
Don't know if his reasoning is "I'm going to show them how little I care about it by insulting everyone about eating cum", Tiny if that's your reasoning you just look insecure, fyi.

He could have just ignored it, but I find this whole situation weird. Like no one asked him to pay for breakfast. He clearly wanted to build a relationship with these people. However that wasn't reciprocated by them, and they rightfully called him out. Even his response of "well if they reworded their tweet to me like this..." was bizarre. We know anyone that treats destiny kindly is not rewarded in kindness especially if their opposed to his views or make him feel inferior.

These gentlemen shared their weapons, and ammo with him. They also gave him their time and through tom access to their platforms . He rewards them by slandering them.

This is why destiny appeals to turkey tom and other low level sub humans. He is like their daddy. It's why he is jealous of Hasan Piker. He is not likeable, or charismatic. He is a toddler empowered by his army of low value sub humans and his orbiters like turkey tom and willy mac. May this be the end of him and his community.