Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[SchizoNerd420]

If she can't show an instance of him sharing one of her videos after October 2022, he will most likely file a motion to dismiss with prejudice after or maybe even during the discovery phase.

Perhaps this is needlessly pedantic, but its too late for him to file a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. If he wanted to do that, he should have done it before filing an answer. At this stage, he can file a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or a summary judgment motion. And he can make that same argument (that the federal statute doesn't apply because he sent the videos before it was enacted) in a summary judgment motion.

 

[A. G. Peak]

More docket updates.

---

Order Setting Trial, Calendar Call, Reference to Magistrate Judge, Pretrial Deadlines, and Pretrial Procedures

Spoiler: Document 23

---

Notice of Proposed Order

Spoiler: Document 28

[Proposed] Order Granting Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction

Spoiler: Document 28-1

 

[Dylon Stevens]

Perhaps this is needlessly pedantic, but its too late for him to file a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. If he wanted to do that, he should have done it before filing an answer. At this stage, he can file a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or a summary judgment motion. And he can make that same argument (that the federal statute doesn't apply because he sent the videos before it was

So there's not even a motion to dismiss available? That sounds a bit crazy, how hard is it to toss out a federal suit? So Destiny by replying to the suit lost his first motion to dismiss and by denying or making cross-claims he lost his second one?

How can a judge do a summary judgment if he denies every single thing pleaded? The pleadings feature him confessing to having done the deed which would fit the clause, but the date of when he did it is unclear, the judge doesn't have the facts to decide, on top of that the facts are contested and denied. So is that it? Did he lose any chance of tossing this out at preliminary hearings?

 

[SchizoNerd420]

So there's not even a motion to dismiss available? That sounds a bit crazy, how hard is it to toss out a federal suit? So Destiny by replying to the suit lost his first motion to dismiss and by denying or making cross-claims he lost his second one?

How can a judge do a summary judgment if he denies every single thing pleaded? The pleadings feature him confessing to having done the deed which would fit the clause, but the date of when he did it is unclear, the judge doesn't have the facts to decide, on top of that the facts are contested and denied. So is that it? Did he lose any chance of tossing this out at preliminary hearings?

Destiny hasn't "lost" anything yet. Under the federal rules of civil procedure, a defendant just can't generally file a motion to dismiss once the pleading stage is over (typically, the pleading stage involves the plaintiff filing a complaint and the defendant filing an answer to the complaint). A motion for judgment on the pleadings is essentially the same thing as a motion to dismiss, just after the pleadings are filed.

For purposes of summary judgment, it doesn't really matter what Destiny denied in the answer. It wasn't a verified answer, meaning he wasn't swearing to to the truthfulness of those denials under the penalty of perjury, so those denials aren't evidence. Summary judgment has to be based on admissible evidence, and the court will decide to grant or deny summary judgment (assuming that a summary judgment motion(s) is filed, which I expect will happen) based on the evidence presented by the parties. It appears from the joint scheduling report that the parties anticipate doing discovery, during which they will presumably get access to such evidence. And, per the scheduling order, they each have until next year to file a summary judgment motion.

 

[SocDem_Incel]

a scroll of destiny's dm's with a woman in late 2024, being spread around. Im surprised they havent made it here. Ive cut out some sexual elements.
edit: sorry mods. I didn't mean to post a dupe.
View attachment 7175689

Where was this originally posted? *I'm a degenerate coomer just like my streamer and I want to see the sexual elements you cut out

 

[Dylon Stevens]

It appears from the joint scheduling report that the parties anticipate doing discovery

That's exactly what I was referring to. He's already out of preliminary options and has to go into discovery. This isn't good for him considering the logs and testimonies we have already seen.

 

[do ut des]

So there's not even a motion to dismiss available? That sounds a bit crazy, how hard is it to toss out a federal suit? So Destiny by replying to the suit lost his first motion to dismiss and by denying or making cross-claims he lost his second one?

How can a judge do a summary judgment if he denies every single thing pleaded? The pleadings feature him confessing to having done the deed which would fit the clause, but the date of when he did it is unclear, the judge doesn't have the facts to decide, on top of that the facts are contested and denied. So is that it? Did he lose any chance of tossing this out at preliminary hearings?

Its pretty normal for civil court, that you have to make such arguments as early as possible. F.E. idk about the US, but in my country if the specific court doesnt have jurisdiction (as long as the jurisdiction still falls to a civil court [of a different kind] and the court that the suit has been filed in is a civil court) the court gains jurisdiction by the defendant not arguing that the court lacks jurisdiction in his initial reponse to the suit. This even applys to international jurisdiction within the EU thanks to the Brüssel-1a VO. So i guess it would be similiar with a motion to dismiss, tho IF (and thats a very big IF) Stephen hasnt send the nudes after the stated date (or the court at least doesnt see the chats in which he did) i cant see how he will be found guilty.

 

[Intueta]

He has 13k live viewers right now, is he view-botting?

 

[SchizoNerd420]

Its pretty normal for civil court, that you have to make such arguments as early as possible. F.E. idk about the US, but in my country if the specific court doesnt have jurisdiction (as long as the jurisdiction still falls to a civil court [of a different kind] and the court that the suit has been filed in is a civil court) the court gains jurisdiction by the defendant not arguing that the court lacks jurisdiction in his initial reponse to the suit. This even applys to international jurisdiction within the EU thanks to the Brüssel-1a VO. So i guess it would be similiar with a motion to dismiss, tho IF (and thats a very big IF) Stephen hasnt send the nudes after the stated date (or the court at least doesnt see the chats in which he did) i cant see how he will be found guilty.

So, there's actually some nuance here depending on what you mean by "jurisdiction." Destiny likely waived any challenge he had to the court's personal jurisdiction over the case by answering the complaint and subsequently participating in filing a joint scheduling report (I'm not even sure why he denied that the court had personal jurisdiction in his answer; obviously a federal district court in Florida has personal jurisdiction because both of the parties live there). As to the court's subject-matter jurisdiction, technically parties can raise that at any point in the proceedings, and the court can even dismiss the case on its own motion if it finds that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. Theoretically, Destiny could even raise that on appeal without even arguing it before the district court, but I suspect subject-matter jurisdiction is gonna be the primary issue the parties argue about because, without that federal statute, there's no basis for federal jurisdiction.

 

[Jershua Coomer Troon]

Geez, I already know all this stuff but its crazy when you see it all written down in one document and in legalese. The penny lawyer is going to make some nice sandwich money covering this.

 

[do ut des]

So, there's actually some nuance here depending on what you mean by "jurisdiction." Destiny likely waived any challenge he had to the court's personal jurisdiction over the case by answering the complaint and subsequently participating in filing a joint scheduling report (I'm not even sure why he denied that the court had personal jurisdiction in his answer; obviously a federal district court in Florida has personal jurisdiction because both of the parties live there). As to the court's subject-matter jurisdiction, technically parties can raise that at any point in the proceedings, and the court can even dismiss the case on its own motion if it finds that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. Theoretically, Destiny could even raise that on appeal without even arguing it before the district court, but I suspect subject-matter jurisdiction is gonna be the primary issue the parties argue about because, without that federal statute, there's no basis for federal jurisdiction.

Thanks for the response, since i sadly cant really articulate myself well in/ understand legal english its difficult for me to respond, but tbh it doesnt really matter since the legal system I practice within isnt a common law one and as such is quiet different to the states one. Nevertheless, thks for the legal evaluations of the court documents/the current state of the lawsuit, thats really interesting!

 

[Dylon Stevens]

without that federal statute, there's no basis for federal jurisdiction.

Discovery will reveal that Destiny had a google drive with the sex tape available to others just last year, which puts him in the jurisdiction of the federal clause. In the occasion that just having the google drive available to others doesn't count, he probably shared it with others because he's clearly obsessed with sex tapes and sharing them. That's why discovery is so bad for destiny and not having a way to deter it could be devastating to his case. I was thinking he had a shot at using the fact that he shared it to Rose so long ago to rush the judge to make a ruling on this clause, but apparently he might not have that option.

It could get even worst, It could even end up digging up a criminalizing message where he admits he recorded people without their consent, which is what gossips have been claiming.

 

[SchizoNerd420]

Yeah, I wouldn't want to go through discovery if I was Destiny. I can't imagine the full extent of his logs make him look good, even if he didn't technically do anything illegal. Also, you know, not a great idea for him to go and delete a bunch of his logs with women he was sharing sexual material with after he had notice that Pxie was going to sue him. If I was him and the logs really didn't have anything inculpatory in them, I'd be hoping they are reproducible somehow because the court would be well within its rights to just assume that whatever logs he deleted were unfavorable to his case.

 

[A. G. Peak]

Two new documents on the docket.

Pxie listed these names as likely to have discoverable information:

1. Plaintiff Jane Doe
2. Defendant Steven Bonnell II
3. Hannah Brookes
4. Melina Goransson
5. Stasia
6. Chaeiry
7. Rose
8. Solotinyleaks
9. Ashoka Bun-O
10. Aurorastarr
11. Abbymc
12. Dan Saltman
13. Kyla Turner
14. Denims

---

Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures

Spoiler: Document 29

Plaintiff’s, Jane Doe, Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement

Spoiler: Document 30

 

[Dylon Stevens]

the court would be well within its rights to just assume that whatever logs he deleted were unfavorable to his case.

There's no such thing as deleted messages in 2025. If Discord is subpoena'd they'll provided everything. Something to consider.

Something else to consider is that a DA can use evidence found in civil discovery cases to build a criminal one.

 

[SchizoNerd420]

Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures

This is a bit bizarre. There's no reason to file these absent a court order; they are typically just served on the opposing party. Whelp, good for us observers, I guess.

 

[Handsome and Cool]

There's no such thing as deleted messages in 2025. If Discord is subpoena'd they'll provided everything. Something to consider.

I'm interested to see if this is actually true. If I remember correctly there were deleted messages that were unrecoverable during the Jack Teixeira case.

How long Discord keeps your information

Information you can delete directly from the services​

You may edit or erase content that you post within Discord. For example:

• You can edit or delete any message you have sent or content you have posted if you still have access to the space where you posted it.
• You can edit or delete a Discord server if you have the permissions needed to do so.
• You can edit or delete a channel from a Discord server if you have the permissions needed to do so.

Once you delete content, it will no longer be available to other users (though it may take some time to clear cached uploads). Deleted content will also be deleted from Discord’s systems, but we may retain content longer if we have a legal obligation to preserve it as described below. Public posts may also be retained for 180 days to two years for use by Discord as described in our Privacy Policy (for example, to help us train models that proactively detect content that violates our policies).

Retention periods for specific purposes​

Business and legal requirements may mean that we need to retain certain information for set periods of time, some of which may extend beyond the deletion of your account. For each type of information, we set these data retention periods based on the reason for its collection:

• Age verification. If you submit an ID for an age verification appeal, we will delete it within sixty days after the age appeal ticket is closed.
• Backups. Our database backups are stored for 30-45 days upon which they are deleted.
• Compliance with our legal obligations. We may need to retain certain information for longer periods to comply with legal requirements. For example, when you purchase something through Discord, we need to retain information related to that transaction for specific periods for tax and accounting purposes.
• To meet our safety and security commitments. We retain certain information (including email addresses and phone numbers) for 180 days after deletion for trust and safety purposes. If a user has been reported or flagged for violations of our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines, we may retain this information for up to two years. This information helps us keep Discord secure, prevent fraud, or prevent bad actors from creating new accounts or otherwise engaging in behavior that violates our policies.
• To exercise or defend legal claims. When you contact Discord directly (such as for customer support inquiries and requests to access your information), we retain related information for five years from the closure of your request in case of a dispute or to exercise or defend our legal rights.
• Continuity of our service: If you delete your account, we continue to retain and display the content you shared with other users, but that content is no longer tied to your account. We do this in order to ensure that other users continue to have access to the content shared with them. If you want to delete specific content, please do so before you delete your account. You can delete specific content as described in the “Information you can delete directly from the services” section above, or if you need help deleting content, you can write in to privacy@discord.com.

 

[StrangerMe]

He has 13k live viewers right now, is he view-botting?

No. His audience, specifically his live one, are genuinely like a cult.
Destiny can genuinely get caught murdering kids, and they would still watch him and defend him. They are genuinely ill.

I looked it up and it’s registered to Destiny.gg LLC in Omaha, NE. I’m mobilefagging atm, so I won’t post a screenshot but here’s the link for proof (A) the address listed on the site (10933 Spring St Omaha, Nebraska, 68144) is also not mentioned anywhere else in the thread.

I also checked who it belonged to using TextNow and it was valid as well, registered to his actual name. I’m willing to bet this is his actual number and not a burner

Spoiler: TextNow screenshot

View attachment 7170935

Yeah, came from a person I trust, so I knew it was real.
Good that we have confirmation tho ( I hadn't even bothered google searching the number, I just trusted the info).

Ashoka Bun-O

Only person I don't recognize. I'm guessing something that never made it to the thread.

 

[poopyman]

Pxie listed these names as likely to have discoverable information:

1. Plaintiff Jane Doe
2. Defendant Steven Bonnell II
3. Hannah Brookes
4. Melina Goransson
5. Stasia
6. Chaeiry
7. Rose
8. Solotinyleaks
9. Ashoka Bun-O
10. Aurorastarr
11. Abbymc
12. Dan Saltman
13. Kyla Turner
14. Denims

Can a loremaster give a rundown on who each of these people are? I'm unaware of Hannah Brookes, Ashoka Bun-O, Aurorastarr, and Abbymc.

 

[A. G. Peak]

Only person I don't recognize. I'm guessing something that never made it to the thread.

Ahsoka Bun-o was mentioned in the motion for a temporary restraining order.