Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Genetic fallacy. @StrangerMe is a bad person (harassment towards Mr.Girl), however that doesn't change the fact that most of the shit he says about destiny is true. A moral failing doesn't change the accuracy of the claims you make.
Bruh those fallacys are such terminally online arguments. Of course it does matter who makes the argument.

If its an argument about something factual it matters bc ppl dont have the time and factual knowledge to check every factual claim, so naturally, it is only reasonable to value claims from ppl who are well known/scholars in that field more.

If its an argument about about something abstract like morality, it matters bc the person making the argument claims that the moral system invoked by them is a/the most/somewhat reasonable and that under that system, you have to behave in a certain way. If the person who invokes said system is a very amoral person, as long as you dont have inifite time/a perfect understanding of morality (which you cant), it is reasonable to assume that said system is less "good" than other systems or that the person advocating for the "good" system doesnt really believe in it, which in turn means that one should look to other people invoking moral systems if one wants to act in a moral way.
 
he can accurately summarize what an opposing side thinks
That's not what he's doing. What he actually does is mischaracterize the opposing side's arguments, creates a strawman, and then argues against that. He's a good debater, I'll give him that, but he's not a genuine thinker. It's mostly sophistry and being pedantic. Dean Withers is the one-trick pony version of Destiny. Destiny has a few more debate tricks. There's no substance. All he has to do is be slightly more clever than his audience and make them think they are more intelligent than they are.

I may as well be talking to a wall; Trump should put tariffs on your internet.
 
What he actually does is mischaracterize the opposing side's arguments, creates a strawman, and then argues against that.
destiny engages in bad faith a lot, but its pretty rare for him to just straight up straw man unless the debate is regarding a personal matter (he strawmans people who speak on his personal life way more than people he politically disagrees with). If he's ever backed in to a corner he'll

1)pivot to a subject he knows more about
2)demand a greater standard of evidence for the opposing side than himself
3)attack a small claim that his interlocutor makes rather than a big claim (red herring)
4)autistically focus on words that someone used incorrectly or an exact statistic or order of events that someone got wrong
5)bait someone into making a claim they haven't thought through

It's pretty difficult to strawman someone when they can correct you in the middle of a debate. Destiny is comfortable strawmanning JSTLK because Destiny will never debate him and his embed is banned in DGG chat. Strawmanning only works if you have total narrative control, and in a debate with another person destiny doesn't have enough control over the narrative for people to buy into it without question (especially when the audience is outside of DGG)
 
but I still need to make progress on finding the car
a Kia Soul seems to have a lot in common with things in the pic but idk it's coming from a very untrained eye -- i'm also retarded when it comes to basic photography and can't tell if the picture might be mirrored somehow, or what side of her face(from her perspective) the mole near her lips is actually on. Things like that would be helpful to know because some cars only have the coathanger attachment for the rear grab handles on the driver's side.

There's all sorts of trims and options which make it hard to find an exact match but i think this car has a lot of macro-level similarities going for it
i believe these are all from a 2015 Kia Soul
compare to: https://kiwifarms.st/attachments/1732671925449-png.6691067/ (maybe mirror it, which i assume is normal if we think it's a selfie? again photography retard)
2015_Kia_Soul_79.png
2015_Kia_Soul_77.png
2015_Kia_Soul_67.png

Notes:
-this car seems to have a similar window shape in the rear and also the little triangular one in the back
-the rear seats have that high U-shaped seam like the one in the rose photo
-the back of the front seats have that distinguished back plate
-the dimples of the inner door seem to have the same pattern as the one behind rose if you look at both the silver handle peeking out from between her arm and leg and the upper right curved dimple popping out from behind her shoulder
-Kia is a subsidiary of Hyundai... if this isn't the car maybe the similarities span across that particular brand
-that blanket thing with the arrows on it could be tucked into the pouch
-car has the option to come without a sunroof

the car comes with all sorts of diff options on interior, rose's appears to be a type of black or grey cloth one...
Exposure is another element i'm too retarded to comment on but maybe that could come into play, and explain why the windows look like there are flashbangs going on outside

the bottom seams on the seat itself (the part you sit on) also line up with other pictures of 2015 Kia Souls such as
Used-2015-Kia-Soul-Base-1630346064.jpg

that's my best shot, i hope it's at least helpful in some way
sorry i didnt do the whole color coordinating and highlighting the similarities thing, i've just been staring at different photos/videos of this damn car for too many hours and want to stop but also get this info out there




Im very anti destiny and anti women who enable him so genuine question: what is this woman’s intentions in sending these DMs around? Justice for Destiny’s victims?
It seems like a lot of these sluts are getting their 10 mins of fame by leaking DMs at the first opportunity.
These hoes are very much a part of the ecosystem that enables men like destiny.
being a recipient of the pxie vids could have pissed her off once she found out they were shared without consent

and it looks like she dealt with destiny's "fuckboy behavior" first hand, you can see from the logs they sexted a lot and he was very reciprocal with messaging until right after they met up and had what she described to be an awkward experience... she was also the one who had to reach out to Destiny after because he didn't check-in or anything for like 5 days

from that point on the convo takes a different turn where she's sending messages that span the full page and destiny responding with 1-2 lines at most

He can't both be coldly calculating and acting rationally and doing dumb things that will cause the court to be prejudiced against him.
he's used to getting away with it, and from the start was unconcerned with the legal case-- he only cared about the reputational damage and PR stuff, which he feels pxie already did maximum damage with her substack post. A few curveballs he didn't seem to expect were the very large initial settlement demands, pxie's focus on a punitive approach, it actually ever making it this far. He also has something akin to confidence that made him reject pxie's lawyer's follow-up offer of "anything over $150k" so there's all sorts of spite, ego, retardation, confidence at play here.

Denims being called as someone worth doing discovery on is a good example; Destiny brazenly admitted to his illegal recording of her, still defends it, and even played snippets of it on stream back when it happened, he also used it to attack her character in a way so. And now she's potentially being used in this case against him; He is cold and calculating in some ways but he also does things like that sometimes
 
Genetic fallacy. @StrangerMe is a bad person (harassment towards Mr.Girl), however that doesn't change the fact that most of the shit he says about destiny is true. A moral failing doesn't change the accuracy of the claims you make.
Many of the people who message me stuff think I'm a bad person, but support my "fight", because Destiny is simply worse.

You have to fight fire with a more autistic fire.

a Kia Soul seems to have a lot in common with things in the pic but idk it's coming from a very untrained eye -- i'm also retarded when it comes to basic photography and can't tell if the picture might be mirrored somehow, or what side of her face(from her perspective) the mole near her lips is actually on. Things like that would be helpful to know because some cars only have the coathanger attachment for the rear grab handles on the driver's side.
1743812578787.png
It is indeed. I was going to keep it secret for a couple days, but it's not that important tbh.

All credit to @loldggL and @Sodom And Gomorrah .

The strategy I was going to take, to identify it, is I was going to make a sketchup model, or alternatively a drawing, and post it in as many car forums/communities, with a bullshit story about why I needed it identified.

The car is incredibly helpful, so the hunt is on.
 
If this is true it is not congruent with how he acts. You really shouldn't delete evidence. If he asked his lawyers they would very much tell him not to do that. He can't both be coldly calculating and acting rationally and doing dumb things that will cause the court to be prejudiced against him.
The idea of a cool calculating sociopath is mostly a fictional invention of movies and TV.

In reality most sociopaths are spergy tards with low impulse control. They think their ability to manipulate others makes them intelligent, but even a dog can manipulate people. Its really not that impressive from an intellectual perspective.
 
Miraculously, no. Apparently he sent it to at least 8 people and (iirc) someone has offered to send JSTLK it, but he said no.
I find this really strange. @StrangerMe @Code Cave do you know anyone that has the melina manifesto? i feel like this is quite an important document to my journalistic interests. Certainly jstlk and crew have gotten a hold of it since they started the eepy meme. I somehow doubt that's the most damaging thing in there.
 
Unfortunately this is true, i've only come to this realization recently. I'm in support of destiny trolling the guy who got shot at the rally, but when he was on a piers morgan panel he was unwilling to condemn the shooter. Technically you can be autistic and say "just because he didn't explicitly denounce it doesn't mean he supports it", but I liked destiny because of the fact that used to make his beliefs extremely clear, its why I sided with him in debates where his interlocutor would dodge questions, obsess over semantics, obfuscate ect.

He was even more spineless in that situation than you might think. Just 2 weeks after it went down, he tried to gaslight his audience into believing that he was being taken out of context, and of course his cult accepted all of it:

 
I find this really strange. @StrangerMe @Code Cave do you know anyone that has the melina manifesto? i feel like this is quite an important document to my journalistic interests. Certainly jstlk and crew have gotten a hold of it since they started the eepy meme. I somehow doubt that's the most damaging thing in there.
I've asked around, but no one who I've messaged with has it saved.
I've been told there's someone in SpicyChat who allegedly has it, or has said they do, but I always forget to reach out when I login into my Discord account I use to message people.

I'll look into it later. But yeah, it's something me and Code Cave have talked about wanting to read.
 
Short summary of the "Individuals Likely to Have Discoverable Information" and their relation to Destiny.

3) Hannah Brookes: c/o SMGQ Law. Hannah is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence.
- Former heroin addict that has chatted with Destiny for a couple of month. To my knowledge they neither traded explicit material nor ever talked specificially about Pxies leaked video. But she says in the affidavit that he offered to share Pxie's video. Which is interesting. Either there are more messages between them that weren't made public (I haven't seen) or she is lying. But Destiny deleted his messages with her, which might fuck him over in this case.

4) Melina Goransson: Melina is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence.
- Destiny's ex-wife. Most likely will not comply or cooperate. She has some hatred for Destiny but her will to not be involved in anything legal is probably bigger. She is Swedish living in Sweden. They probably won't be able to subpeona her in Sweden. She originally retweeted Pxies substack post but deleted it a couple of days later. Stacia complained about her not supporting their legal efforts.

5) Stasia (Screen name): Stasia is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence.
- Long time hook up partner of Destiny and Melina. Stacia is part of the leaks herself. She is supposedly pursuing legal action against Destiny herself. I don't think she has any information about Pxie's video.

6) Chaeiry (Screen name): Chaeiry is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence. Case 1:25-cv-20757-JB Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2025 Page 1 of 5
- Multiple times hook up partner. Chaeiry has BPD and Destiny is probably her "favorite person". I never heard that Destiny traded explicit content with her. Destiny supposedly shared a secret audio recording of a sexual interaction with her. She said she filed a police report about it. But as far as I am aware audio and sexts aren't considered under any revenge porn law.

7) Rose (Screen name): Rose is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images, including the Video of Jane Doe, and the publication of the videos on November 29, 2024.
- The account the leaks were exported from. She will stay as far away from this as possible. If her identity is known to anyone it's probably only Destiny. And I am almost certain he will deny any knowledge of her Identity or having information that might lead to finding out. After all there is a chance she was underage when they started sexting.

8) Solotinyleaks (Screen name): Solotinyleaks is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images, including the Video of Jane Doe, and the publication of the videos on November 29, 2024.
- @SoloTinyLeaks account that actually leaked "the Video". Best guess is that it is Rose's ex or current bf. Didn't leak anything compromising of Rose from his export. I don't think he had any idea that there might have been no consent from the people involved to share the videos with Rose. It looked like he had no idea who the people were in the videos besides Melina and Destiny.

9) Ashoka Bun-O (Screen name): Ashoka Bun-O is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence.
- Never heard of her before but apparantly they were exchanging explicit material. The only Person she identified was Melina.
1743815086523.png

Interesting that they're claiming Destiny deleted messages in February from Psykodynamic. I am almost certain they were complaining 20th-22nd of January in JSTLK Discord that he deleted all messages with everybody who was active in that Discord.

10) Aurorastarr: (Screen name): Aurorastarr is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence.
- Was hooking up with Destiny in November 2023 in Miami. She was for a long time in Destiny's Discord server. But she seems to have left. Not sure if it is related to the leaks though. She has an Onlyfans but I did not investigate what kind of content she releases on there. She most likely was sent explicit material but not the Pxie Video. There is a chance she might have recorded something with him that was shared without her consent as well. She is Canadian living in Toronto I think. subpoenering her might be difficult if that's needed.

11) Abbymc (Screen name): Abbymc is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence.
- I have no idea who this is. Is this the stripper Abby that was living with DariusIRL and Ahrelevant? If she is, than it's another hook up partner of Destiny he most likely has exchanged explicit material with. Maybe she was recording videos with Destiny that were sent without her consent.

12) Dan Saltman: Dan is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images, including the Video of Jane Doe, and his destruction of evidence.
- Co-host of AnythingElse podcast and probably the only long time friend Destiny has in the streamer world. If he knows anything that's not publicly known already they will probably have to subpoena him to get anything from him.

13) Kyla Turner: Kyla is likely to have information regarding the allegations of the Complaint including Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images, including the Video of Jane Doe, and his interactions with the victims of the November 29, 2024 publications.
- Co-host of Bridges Podcast and personal assisstant/booker. Destiny might have told her a lot. She publicly stated that she asked Destiny if he had consent to share Pxie's video and he supposedly answered "probably not". She's probably more loyal to Destiny than Pxie but I think she will give truthful statements even without being subpoenaed.

14) Denims (Screen name): Denims is likely to have information regarding Defendant’s nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images and his destruction of evidence.
- Fucked a fan of Destiny in Destiny's apartment/bed. Destiny did make a non sexual secret audio recording confronting her and published parts of it later. I think part of the recording is in here: https://youtu.be/QFlJHPzeeIA?si=Upv2JapxHpzHge7g . I doubt they had any sexual interaction afterwards. And considering this was all before Destiny met Pxie in person I doubt she will have anything to contribute.
 
Last edited:
@Code Cave
Providing additional screenshots. In the scroll, I ham-fisted the removal of sexual media. I'm now going in and around those videos to provide more cropped screen shots.
Screenshot 2025-04-04 205601.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205550.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205541.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205528.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205511.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205451.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205407.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205334.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205239.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205235.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205210.pngScreenshot 2025-04-04 205042.png
Again, apologies to mods or otherwise if I should adhere to adding spoilers, or other forum norms. I will gladly adjust if informed.
I also tried to upload in chronological order but couldnt verify without manually uploading one-by-one.
edit: if one or more screenshots is illegible due to video compression, I can re-screenshot at an alternate frame and likely clear up any obscurities.

1743819835587.png

destiny claims the TRO is denied
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
1743822883260.png
Code Cave gave me permission to post.

Now, I don't know anything about Cash App, but does it require you to put a real legal name?
Anyways.

"Magentia" = Magenta, which is Rose's hair colour. I would probably ignore the Magentia if Cashapp doesn't require you to use your real name and just focus on the Rose Reilly. In the case that "Rose" isn't actually related to her real name, then I believe Reilly at the very least probably is.

So, KIA very likely to be her car / her parent's, although it could be a boyfriend's too.

(Magentia) Rose Reilly the name to search for.
 
Last edited:
Back